― Advertisement ―

HomePage No.# 1/2 vs The State Of Assam on 21 April, 2026

Page No.# 1/2 vs The State Of Assam on 21 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Gauhati High Court

Page No.# 1/2 vs The State Of Assam on 21 April, 2026

Author: M. Zothankhuma

Bench: Michael Zothankhuma

                                                                         Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010072872022




                                                                  undefined

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1329/2025
                                      in Crl.A./60/2022


              SUKUR ALI AND ANR
              S/O MD. KASEM ALI
              RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ANTHAIBARI
              PS GOSSAIGAON DIST KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM

              2: NAJIR HUSSAIN
              S/O MD. ABU SK.
              RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ANTHAIBARI
               PS GOSSAIGAON DIST KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM

               VERSUS

              THE STATE OF ASSAM
              REP BY THE PP ASSAM
              ------------
              Advocate for : MR H R A CHOUDHURY
              Advocate for : PP
              ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM


                                        BEFORE
                      HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
                        HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

                                           ORDER

Date : 21.04.2026
(M. Zothankhuma, J)

Heard Mr. I. U. Choudhury, learned counsel for the appellants/applicants
and Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Add. PP, Assam.

SPONSORED

Page No.# 2/2

No one appears for the respondent No. 2 even though notice had been
served upon the respondent No. 2.

The appellants/applicants have prayed for suspension of the sentence
passed pursuant to the impugned judgment dated 11.03.2022 by the learned
Special Judge (POCSO), Kokrajhar in Special Case No. 08/2018, convicting the
appellants/applicants under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and under Section 376D
of the IPC.

We have noticed that the applicants had earlier approached this Court by
availing the provisions of Section 389 Cr.PC, which is akin to Section 430 BNSS,
vide I.A.(Crl.) 171/2022. The prayer of the applicants for suspension of the
sentence and grant of bail had been rejected earlier, vide order dated
18.08.2022.

On considering the reasons for the rejection of the applicants’ earlier
application for suspension of the sentence and grant of bail, we find that no
new grounds are forthcoming in this application, except for the fact that the
hearing of the case was not likely to conclude within a short time. However, as
can be seen from the order dated 21.04.2026 passed in the main appeal, the
final hearing of the main appeal has been fixed on 21.05.2026.

In view of the reasons stated above, we do not find any ground to allow
the present application and the application is accordingly dismissed.

                                JUDGE                                     JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
 



Source link