Page No.# 1/2 vs The State Of Assam on 21 April, 2026

    0
    33
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Gauhati High Court

    Page No.# 1/2 vs The State Of Assam on 21 April, 2026

    Author: M. Zothankhuma

    Bench: Michael Zothankhuma

                                                                             Page No.# 1/2
    
    GAHC010072872022
    
    
    
    
                                                                      undefined
    
                                  THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
       (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
    
                                    Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1329/2025
                                          in Crl.A./60/2022
    
    
                  SUKUR ALI AND ANR
                  S/O MD. KASEM ALI
                  RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ANTHAIBARI
                  PS GOSSAIGAON DIST KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM
    
                  2: NAJIR HUSSAIN
                  S/O MD. ABU SK.
                  RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ANTHAIBARI
                   PS GOSSAIGAON DIST KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM
    
                   VERSUS
    
                  THE STATE OF ASSAM
                  REP BY THE PP ASSAM
                  ------------
                  Advocate for : MR H R A CHOUDHURY
                  Advocate for : PP
                  ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
    
    
                                            BEFORE
                          HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
                            HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
    
                                               ORDER
    

    Date : 21.04.2026
    (M. Zothankhuma, J)

    Heard Mr. I. U. Choudhury, learned counsel for the appellants/applicants
    and Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Add. PP, Assam.

    SPONSORED

    Page No.# 2/2

    No one appears for the respondent No. 2 even though notice had been
    served upon the respondent No. 2.

    The appellants/applicants have prayed for suspension of the sentence
    passed pursuant to the impugned judgment dated 11.03.2022 by the learned
    Special Judge (POCSO), Kokrajhar in Special Case No. 08/2018, convicting the
    appellants/applicants under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and under Section 376D
    of the IPC.

    We have noticed that the applicants had earlier approached this Court by
    availing the provisions of Section 389 Cr.PC, which is akin to Section 430 BNSS,
    vide I.A.(Crl.) 171/2022. The prayer of the applicants for suspension of the
    sentence and grant of bail had been rejected earlier, vide order dated
    18.08.2022.

    On considering the reasons for the rejection of the applicants’ earlier
    application for suspension of the sentence and grant of bail, we find that no
    new grounds are forthcoming in this application, except for the fact that the
    hearing of the case was not likely to conclude within a short time. However, as
    can be seen from the order dated 21.04.2026 passed in the main appeal, the
    final hearing of the main appeal has been fixed on 21.05.2026.

    In view of the reasons stated above, we do not find any ground to allow
    the present application and the application is accordingly dismissed.

                                    JUDGE                                     JUDGE
    Comparing Assistant
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here