Rajendra Mandal @ Rejendra Mandar vs The State Of Bihar on 15 April, 2026

    0
    47
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court

    Rajendra Mandal @ Rejendra Mandar vs The State Of Bihar on 15 April, 2026

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                         Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11430 of 2022
         ======================================================
         Rajendra Mandal @ Rejendra Mandar S/o Late Nanulal Mandal @ Late Nanu
         Mandar, Resident of Village - Auranga Usuri, Police Station - Baheri, Dist. -
         Darbhanga.
    
    
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                            Versus
    1.   The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Revenue, Government of
         Bihar.
    2.   The District Magistrate cum Collector, Darbhanga.
    3.   The Additional Collector Ceiling, Darbhanga.
    4.   The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Darbhanga.
    5.   The Circle Officer, Biraul, Darbhanga.
    
    
                                                                       ... ... Respondent/s
         ======================================================
         Appearance :
         For the Petitioner/s    :      Mr. Baidya Nath Prasad, Adv.
         For the Respondent/s    :      Mr. Sajid Salim Khan (SC-25)
         ======================================================
         CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
         ORAL JUDGMENT

    Date : 15-04-2026

    Heard Mr. Baidya Nath Prasad, the learned

    SPONSORED

    counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, the

    learned SC-25 for the State.

    2. The present writ application has been filed for

    issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for a direction to

    the respondent authorities to release the petitioner’s land,
    Patna High Court CWJC No.11430 of 2022 dt.15-04-2026
    2/4

    which has been declared surplus land by Ceiling Case No. 69

    of 1973-1974 illegally without any notice upon him and

    without proper enquiry under Section 5(i) (ii) by avoiding

    Section 9(2) of the Ceiling Act.

    3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

    that his grievances shall be redressed if the present writ

    application be disposed of with a direction to the Additional

    Collector (Ceiling), Darbhanga (respondent No. 3) in terms of

    the order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 14493 of 2002

    & analogous cases, disposed of on 21.04.2005 (Annexure-2 to

    the writ application).

    4. It has been submitted on behalf of the

    petitioner that he is the purchaser of the land in question,

    which has been declared to be surplus by the authorities

    concerned. It has further been submitted that the case of the

    petitioner is exactly similar to the case of one Yamun Mandal

    & Ors., which was also the subject matter in the batch of writ

    petitions, i.e., C.W.J.C. Nos. 768 of 2003.

    5. Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, the learned SC-25,

    submits that the petitioner, being the purchaser, cannot be

    given the opportunity of being heard at such a belated stage

    and passage of time upon the disposal of the aforesaid writ
    Patna High Court CWJC No.11430 of 2022 dt.15-04-2026
    3/4

    application. It has further been submitted that the Additional

    Collector (Ceiling), Darbhanga (respondent No. 3) can look

    into the matter, if the original land-holder from whom the

    petitioner has purchased the said land is heard before passing

    any order.

    6. In view of the aforesaid submissions and

    taking into account the earlier order passed by this Court in

    aforesaid C.W.J.C. No. 14493 of 2002 & analogous cases, the

    petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the

    Additional Collector (Ceiling), Darbhanga (respondent No. 3),

    detailing his grievances, within a period of four weeks from

    today, who, on receipt of such representation, after taking into

    account the fact that the petitioner had purchased the property

    way-back in the year 1977 from the land-holder whose land

    has subsequently been declared to be surplus and after giving

    due opportunity of hearing to the original land-holder/legal

    heirs or legal representatives of the land in question apart from

    the other relevant parties including the petitioner, shall pass a

    reasoned order in accordance with law within a further period

    of four months of the receipt of such representation.

    7. If the claim of the petitioner is found to be tenable,

    necessary sequel order shall also be passed by the concerned
    Patna High Court CWJC No.11430 of 2022 dt.15-04-2026
    4/4

    respondent/authority within the aforesaid period.

    8. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ

    petition stands disposed of.

    9. Interlocutor application(s), if any, also stands

    disposed of accordingly.

    (Sourendra Pandey, J)
    Praveen-II/-

    AFR/NAFR                NAFR
    CAV DATE                N/A
    Uploading Date          15.04.2026
    Transmission Date       N/A
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here