Dulari Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 10 April, 2026

    0
    42
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court

    Dulari Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 10 April, 2026

    Author: Harish Kumar

    Bench: Harish Kumar

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20331 of 2025
         ======================================================
         Dulari Devi, Wife of Guddu Yadav, at present Chairman Zila Parishad Jamui,
         Resident of Village- Borar, Sikandra, P.S. Shikandra, District- Jamui.
    
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                            Versus
    
    1.   The State of Bihar through Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of
         Bihar, Patna.
    2.   The Additional Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar,
         Patna.
    3.   The Technical Advisor, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
    4.   The Engineer in Chief Head Quarter, Water Resources Department, Govt. of
         Bihar, Patna.
    5.   The Engineer in Chief (Irrigation Creation), Water Resources Department,
         Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
    6.   The Chief Engineer, Planning and Monetring, Water Resources Department,
         Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
    7.   The Chief Engineer, Master Planning Investigation and Project Preparation,
         Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar.
    8.   The Director, Water Resource and Irrigation Department, Govt. of Bihar,
         Patna.
    9.   The District Magistrate, Jamui, P.S. and District- Jamui.
    10. The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Department, Bhagalpur, P.S. and
        District- Bhagalpur.
    11. The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Jamui, P.S. and District- Jamui.
    12. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Nawabganj Minor Irrigation Officer, P.S.-
        Sikandra, District-Jamui.
    13. The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Sikandra, Jamui P.S.
        and District- Jamui.
    14. The Project Manager, Kundghat, P.S.- Sikandra, District- Jamui.
    
                                                   ... ... Respondent/s
         ======================================================
         Appearance :
         For the Petitioner/s   :      Dr. Anjani Pd. Singh, Advocate
         For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. P. K. Shahi, Advocate General
         ======================================================
         CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                 and
                 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
         ORAL JUDGMENT

    (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
    Patna High Court CWJC No.20331 of 2025 dt.10-04-2026
    2/11

    Date : 10-04-2026

    SPONSORED

    The present writ petition by way of a Public

    Interest Litigation has been filed by the petitioner Dulari Devi

    seeking for construction of sluice gate towards Bahuar Canal

    with regard to Kurdghat reservoir construction in order to save

    the irrigation at Northern Eastern side of the Shikandra Block

    (Jamui) towards Kodasi Jagdishpur to Raghunathpur village

    otherwise it would cause irreparable loss to the 40-50 thousands

    people of Sikandra Block, with a further prayer to direct the

    respondents to provide water in Bahuar river also otherwise it

    would be fatal to several panchayats under Shikandra Block and

    for further direction to the respondents to divert the water in

    proportion of the land to save several panchayats in the down

    water level and to prevent the land being barren land.

    2. The case of the petitioner is as follows:

    “(i). That Kurdghat Jalashya
    Yojna / Kurdghat Reservoir Project is a
    dream project of the Water Resource
    Department under Jamui District. It has
    to be constructed approximately 351
    meters long and 41 meter high dam across
    the Bahuar River in Shikandra Block
    under Jamui District to provide irrigation
    facilities to drought prone area in Jamui
    District for boost agricultural activities.

    Patna High Court CWJC No.20331 of 2025 dt.10-04-2026
    3/11

    (ii). That the petitioner is the
    supporter of the dam project but the
    petitioner only wants proportionate
    distribution of water for her jurisdiction.
    She learnt that the dam has given water to
    Mathurapur Main Canal on the Southern
    side while the aforesaid dam has
    neglected Bahuar river and towards Sable
    Bigha and Kodasi Village Panchayats,
    which will cause great loss to several
    panchayats.

    (iii). That the several
    Mukhiyas of the panchayats like Pole
    Sablebigha, Bhullo and Pramukh of the
    Shikandra Block namely Usha Devi wrote
    letter to petitioner, who is the Chair
    person, Zila Parisad Jamui to open the
    Slice gate towards Bahuar River and they
    became aggrieved as their land has
    become barren.

    (iv). That hundreds of local
    aggrieved persons have written letter to
    the Chairperson of the Zila Parisad of
    Jamui for redressal of their grievances in
    regard to irrigation of their lands and to
    save the land from being barren,
    otherwise people would be on the verge of
    starvation like Faguni Prasad Yadav,
    Santosh Paswan, Nand Kishore Keshri.

    (v). That thereafter the
    Patna High Court CWJC No.20331 of 2025 dt.10-04-2026
    4/11

    petitioner wrote letter vide letter no.
    51/2025 on 11.02.2025 to the Chief
    Engineer, Water Resources and Irrigation
    Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna and
    Principal Secretary, Govt. of Bihar vide
    letter no. 52/2025 dated 11.02.2025 and
    gave reasons that if the respondents
    disturb Bahuar river, forty to fifty
    thousand citizens would be aggrieved but
    till today, no action has been taken with
    regard to the locality concerned.

    (v). That the petitioner has
    also annexed a Nazri Nakasha of the
    locality and it appears that the Sluice
    Gate towards Mathurapur Main Nahar
    Blocks the Bahuar River and that the
    respondents are neglecting the
    farmers/lands, who were earlier
    beneficiaries from the water.”

    3. When the matter was taken up on 18.02.2026,

    learned counsel for the State took time to file counter affidavit

    and accordingly counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the

    respondent nos. 1 to 8 and 10 to 13 by one Ravi Shekhar

    Sharma, Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division Sikandra,

    Jamui, wherein it is stated as follows:

    “5. That the Kundghat
    Reservoir Project has been prepared on
    the basis of comprehensive technical
    Patna High Court CWJC No.20331 of 2025 dt.10-04-2026
    5/11

    survey and investigations on the basis of
    which DPR has been approved. Thereafter
    the design and drawings had been
    approved based on natural flow of water
    (i.e. gravity flow), topography of land
    Thereafter the construction work had been
    started and presently the construction
    work is at the final stage of completion.

    Hence it is not technically and
    economically feasible to provide water in
    North-Eastern villages through this
    Kundghat reservoir scheme. Also, in the
    Design, there is a provision of water flow
    into the Bahuaar River through:-

    a. Escape Channel of
    Kundghat Main Canal.

    b. Spillway Gates of Dam if
    there is excess water in the
    reservoir.

    6. That it is submitted that the
    concerned team had approved the said
    project after considering the natural water
    flow of connected river & gravity flow,
    topographical condition, scientific and
    geological basis as well as the technical
    feasibility and economical optimization
    hence without considering these facts the
    design & alignment of the project cannot
    be changed.

    xxx xxx xxx
    Patna High Court CWJC No.20331 of 2025 dt.10-04-2026
    6/11

    9. That it is stated and
    submitted that the demand of the
    Petitioner to divert the water flow towards
    certain villages is technically unfeasible
    because the ground slope in that direction
    does not favour the gravity flow and the
    project is designed to supply the water
    through natural gradients to ensure
    sustainability and efficiency.

    10. That it is further stated
    that the Bahuaar River is a seasonal hilly
    river which carries heavy flow only for a
    short duration during the monsoon and
    then recedes. To regulate such flow,
    conserve rainwater and ensure planned
    irrigation, the Kundghat Dam was
    constructed on the Bahuaar River. The
    dam is located near Lachuar Village,
    where the eastern side of the river is at a
    higher elevation and the western side is
    lower.

    11. That due to the natural
    topography, the gravity-based irrigation
    from the Bahuaar River is technically
    feasible only towards the western side.
    Accordingly, a canal system was
    constructed to provide irrigation to
    approximately 2035 hectares of land in
    Sikandra Block. The eastern area, being
    higher than the riverbed, cannot receive
    Patna High Court CWJC No.20331 of 2025 dt.10-04-2026
    7/11

    irrigation from the dam through natural
    flow. The same is evident from the Nazari
    Map.

    12. That prior to construction
    of the said dam, monsoon water of the
    Bahuaar River used to flow into the
    Harohar River, and there was no water
    storage or regulated irrigation system.
    After construction, water is stored,
    regulated and safely managed through
    canals, escape regulator and a spillway
    structure for ensuring irrigation in the
    southern command area and overall water
    security.

    13. That the eastern area as
    referred by the Petitioner already falls
    within the Cultural Command Area of
    existing irrigation projects, including the
    Upper Kiul Main Canal (UKMC) and
    connected reservoirs and distributaries.
    The renovation and lining work of the
    UKMC is presently under process and
    upon completion; irrigation water shall
    reach the tail end. The farmers of the
    eastern region will be also benefitted after
    renovation and lining work of the UMKC.
    It is further stated that earlier the UKMC
    was built with soil but now the work of
    concretization in place of soil is under
    process.

    Patna High Court CWJC No.20331 of 2025 dt.10-04-2026
    8/11

    14. That in this regard it is
    further stated that the agreement bearing
    Agreement No. 02/SBD/2025-26 was also
    executed with successful bidder for
    Restoration and Lining Work of main
    Canal from 0.00 to 19.60 Km under Upper
    Kiul Reservoir Scheme for agreement
    amount of Rs.52,67,67,661. As per
    agreement the said work will be completed
    within 18 months.

    15. That it is stated that after
    completion of abovementioned project the
    complete irrigation facility will be
    available in the eastern side as referred by
    the Petitioner. It is pertinent to mention
    that earlier the irrigation facility was also
    available in the eastern side or area as
    referred or demanded by the Petitioner but
    due to some damage in the UKMC, the
    said irrigation facility was disturbed.

    xxx xxx xxx

    17. That earlier vide Letter
    No. 813 dated 11.07.2018 the Executive
    Engineer, Irrigation Division Sikandra
    submitted the Technical feasibility Report
    before the Superintending Engineer,
    Irrigation Circle, Jamui stating all the
    facts about the construction of Kundghat
    Reservoir Scheme. The same is evident
    from the Technical feasibility Report of the
    Patna High Court CWJC No.20331 of 2025 dt.10-04-2026
    9/11

    committee dated 18.12.2017 as well as the
    Estimates dated 08.09.2009.”

    4. After receipt of the counter affidavit, the

    petitioner has filed a rejoinder affidavit, wherein it is stated as

    follows:

    “4. That meaning thereby the
    “Kund Ghat Project” has been
    constructed on the origin point of Bahuar
    River but the design of construction is
    faulty as when rain water raises in the
    reservoir and reaches a height of 30
    metres then the water comes in Bahuar
    River, otherwise water flows to other side,
    i.e., towards Mathurapur and Korwadih it
    appears from the design itself that the
    authority concerned has adopted a step-
    mother treatment towards agriculturists,
    who are beneficiaries of Bahuar river and
    accordingly, it will cause great prejudice
    to the eastern northern area of Sikandra
    Block.

    5. That in the construction of
    Kundghat reservoir there is a provision for
    water flow into Bahuar River through step
    channel and spillway gates if there is
    excess water in the reservoir meaning
    thereby that in a normal situation, there
    will be no water flow towards Bahuar
    river and it will cause great prejudice to
    Patna High Court CWJC No.20331 of 2025 dt.10-04-2026
    10/11

    irrigation in the sub division of Sikandra
    Block. Some photograph is attached
    herewith for clarification of the scenario
    over the Bahuar river.

    xxx xxx xxx

    10. That from the statement
    made in paragraph 13 of the counter
    affidavit it appears now that the petitioner
    will get water after renovation of linking
    work of “Upper Kiul Main Canal”

    (U.K.M.C.) and the renovation of linking
    work of U.K.M.C. is presently under
    process and upon completion, irrigation
    water shall reach the farmers of the
    eastern region.”

    5. We have heard the learned counsel for the

    respective parties and gone through pleading in the writ petition,

    counter affidavit and the rejoinder affidavit. From the record, it

    appears that the construction work of the Kundghat Reservoir

    Project is at the final stage of completion and it is not

    technically and economically feasible to provide water in North-

    Eastern villages through the Kundghat reservoir scheme and that

    the demand of the petitioner to divert the water flow towards

    certain villages is technically not feasible as because the ground

    slope in that direction does not favour the gravity flow and the

    project has been designed to supply the water through natural
    Patna High Court CWJC No.20331 of 2025 dt.10-04-2026
    11/11

    gradients to ensure the sustainability and efficiency.

    Even though the learned counsel for the petitioner

    has disputed the stand taken by the Executive Engineer in the

    counter affidavit, however since these are all technical issues to

    be dealt with by the persons having technical expertise in the

    concerned field and above all in the counter affidavit filed by

    the Executive Engineer, it is clearly stated that the prayer of the

    petitioner regarding diversion of the water towards certain

    villages is technically not feasible, this Court does not find any

    merit in the present Public Interest Litigation.

    6. Accordingly, the Public Interest Litigation is

    disposed of.

    (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)

    (Harish Kumar, J)
    uday/-

    AFR/NAFR                NAFR
    CAV DATE                NA
    Uploading Date          15.04.2026
    Transmission Date       NA
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here