Podala Mohan Sai vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 15 April, 2026

    0
    37
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

    Podala Mohan Sai vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 15 April, 2026

    APHC010179552026
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                        AT AMARAVATI                     [3396]
                                 (Special Original Jurisdiction)
    
                       WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
                          TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
    
                                      PRESENT
    
      THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
    
                           CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2613/2026
    
    Between:
    
       1. PODALA MOHAN SAI, S/O LATE P. SANKAR RAO, AGED 36
          YEARS,OCC TYPIST IN PDM COURT NELLORE,R/O D.NO. 4-8-148,
          SHADHI MANZIL STREET,NAZIR THOTA, NELLORE CITY,SPSR
          NELLORE DISTRICT.
    
                                                    ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
    
                                        AND
    
       1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
          PUBLIC   PROSECUTOR,     HIGH     COURT OF ANDHRA
          PRADESH,THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER,KAKUMANU
          POLICE STATION,GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
    
                                              ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
    
          Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
    praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of
    Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to release the Petitioner/Accused.
    No. 4 on bail in Crime No. 90 of 2025, on the file of the Kakumanu Police
    Station, Guntur and pass
    
    Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
    
       1. SHAIK AFZAL MOHAMMED
    
    Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
    
       1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
                                             2
    
    
         THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
    
                         CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2613/2026
    
    ORDER:

    The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the

    Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity „the BNSS‟), seeking to

    SPONSORED

    enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.4 on bail in Crime No.90 of 2025 of

    Kakumanu Police Station, Guntur, registered against the Petitioner/Accused

    No.4 herein for the offence punishable under Sections 111(4), 318(4) of

    Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66D of Information Technology

    Act.

    2. Heard Mr. Shaik Afzal Mohammed, the learned Counsel for the

    Petitioner and Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.

    3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 23.10.2025 at about 4.00

    p.m., the complainant received a phone call from an unknown woman

    accused, who introduced herself as an officer of the CID, Karnataka State.

    The caller informed the complainant that a case had been registered against

    her in Karnataka relating to human trafficking and instructed her to come to

    Delhi. During the course of the conversation, the caller obtained the

    complainant’s bank details and other family particulars, and the complainant

    disclosed the same to the accused. The said unknown woman thereafter

    made several WhatsApp calls to the complainant’s mobile number and

    informed her that she was allegedly involved in a money laundering case. The

    accused also threatened the complainant with “digital arrest” and demanded
    3

    money to avoid legal action. Believing the version of the unknown accused,

    the complainant transferred an amount of Rs.22,00,000/- and Rs.20,00,000/-

    on two occasions, totaling Rs.42,00,000/-, from her SBI savings account to the

    bank accounts specified by the accused through ICICI Bank transactions.

    Subsequently, upon realizing that she had been cheated by unknown persons,

    the complainant approached the police station on 07.11.2025 and lodged a

    complaint. Based on the said complaint, the police registered the present

    crime.

    4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that petitioner herein is

    arrayed as A.4 in the subject crime and that no specific allegations attributed

    against him attracting the offences alleged against him and that statutory

    period is completed and charge sheet is not filed by the respondent Police.

    Learned counsel would further submit that the petitioner has been in Jail since

    19.12.2025 and that the petitioner is entitled for statutory bail. He would

    further submit that this Court enlarged A.5 on regular bail vide order dated

    24.03.2026 in Crl.P.No.2175 of 2026. The petitioner herein is also on the

    same footing as of A.5. Learned counsel finally prays for grant of bail to the

    petitioner.

    5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the statutory

    period has been completed and no report has been filed before the learned

    Special Court by the concerned and no petition is filed by the concerned

    Public Prosecutor seeking extension of the period of judicial custody up to

    one year by indicating progress of the investigation. She would further submit
    4

    that the petitioner herein is on the same footing as of accused No.5 and the

    Court may pass appropriate orders.

    6. Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the material on

    record, without touching the merits of the case, taking into consideration the

    petitioner has been in jail since 19.122025 and the charge sheet is not filed

    within the statutory period, the petitioner is entitled to be released on default

    bail.

    7. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following

    conditions:

    i. The petitioner/Accused No. 4 shall be enlarged on bail

    on executing bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty

    Thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the

    satisfaction of the learned Additional Junior Civil Judge,

    Ponnur.

    ii. The petitioner/Accused No.4 shall not commit or

    indulge in commission of any offence in future.

    iii. The petitioner/Accused No.4 shall cooperate with the

    investigating officer in further investigation of the case and

    shall make himself available for interrogation by the

    Investigating Officer as and when required.
    5

    iv. The petitioner/Accused No.4 shall not, directly or

    indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any

    person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

    him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court.

    v. The petitioner/Accused No.4 shall surrender his

    passport, if any, to the concerned Court. If he claims that he

    does not have a passport, he shall submit an affidavit to that

    effect to the concerned Court.

    vi. The petitioner/Accused No.4, shall appear before the

    concerned Station House Officer, once in a week i.e., on every

    Saturday between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, until further

    orders.

    As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in

    this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

    __________________________________________
    DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
    Date: 15.04.2026.

    UPS
    6

    57
    THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

    CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2613/2026

    Dt.15.04.2026

    UPS



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here