Meghalaya High Court
Date Of Decision: 10.04.2026 vs Khasi Hills Autonomous District … on 10 April, 2026
Author: H.S.Thangkhiew
Bench: H.S.Thangkhiew
2026:MLHC:325
Serial No.14
Supp. List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
MC[WP(C)]. No. 118 of 2026 in
WP(C). No. 143 of 2026
Date of Decision: 10.04.2026
Shri. Bishal Tham,
Sone of T. Khongsni,
Resident of Urksew-Wahpathaw village,
East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
...Petitioner
-Versus-
1. Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong.
Represented by the Secretary to the
Executive Committee.
2. Deputy Chief Executive Member
I/c Elaka Administration, etc,
Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council Shillong.
3. Acting Sordar, Raid Shabong,
East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya,
represented by Shri Biggestson Lyngdoh.
4. Durbar Shnong, Urksew Wahpathaw Village,
represented by its Headman Shri Archalson Lyngdoh,
Headman of Village Urksew Wahpathaw,
S/o R. Pariat,
R/o Urksew Wahpathaw, East Khasi Hills District,
Meghalaya.
...Respondents
1
2026:MLHC:325
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge
Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. R.Kharsyad, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Ms. O.A.I.Bang, Adv. for R 1&2.
Ms. A.Kharshiing, Adv. for R 4.
i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. This is an application seeking modification, alteration of the order
dated 27-03-2026, passed in WP(C). No. 143 of 2026.
2. Mr. R.Kharsyad, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the
only limited prayer in the misc. application for modification is for directions
for convening a Dorbar meeting of Urksew-Wahpathaw village, East Khasi
Hills. Learned counsel submits that this stalemate has occurred due to the
order of the KHADC, whereby instead of issuing directions for convening a
Dorbar, have also added therein that the said Dorbar shall elect the
Headman. He submits that at this stage, what is necessary is only for a
Dorbar to be convened to discuss the village affairs.
2
2026:MLHC:325
3. Ms. A.Kharshiing, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4, who has
preferred the earlier petition against the said order of the KHADC, has no
objection to the prayer of the applicant being allowed but however, she
submits that as per the order dated 11-11-2025, the meeting will be convened
under the supervision of an observer to be deputed by the office of the Syiem
of Khyrim as also the District Council.
4. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties, as it is seen that there
is a consensus with regard to holding of a Dorbar and for elections to be set
at a later date, this misc. application is allowed. However, it is made clear
that the directions contained in the order dated 11-11-2025, shall also be
followed by the parties in convening the Dorbar.
5. As ordered above, the instant misc. application is allowed and stands
disposed of.
Judge
Signature Not Verified 3
Digitally signed by
SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA
RYNJAH
Date: 2026.04.10 17:26:01 IST
