Umakanta Rout vs Authorized Officer on 6 April, 2026

    0
    36
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Orissa High Court

    Umakanta Rout vs Authorized Officer on 6 April, 2026

    Author: Chittaranjan Dash

    Bench: Chittaranjan Dash

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                      W.P.(C). No. 10332 of 2026
                     Umakanta Rout                           ....       Petitioner
                                                    Ms. Agnisikha Ray, Advocate
                                               -Versus-
                     Authorized Officer, HDFC Bank Ltd.,
                     Khordha                                   ....       Opp. Party
    
    
                               CORAM:
                               JUSTICE KRISHNA SHRIPAD DIXIT
                               JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
                                             ORDER
    

    Order No. 06.04.2026

    01. I.A. No.6271 of 2026
    Challenge in this writ petition is to the coercive recovery
    action initiated under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act,
    2002
    .

    SPONSORED

    2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, Ms. Ray, fervently
    submits that her client had availed a loan of ₹30,00,000/-
    (Rupees Thirty Lakhs only) on 13.08.2022 and another sum of
    ₹10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) on 20.03.2023 along
    with an additional amount of ₹78,900/- (Rupees Seventy-Eight
    Thousand Nine Hundred only) on the same day. She submits
    that only a sum of ₹2.25 lakhs remains outstanding and due to
    financial difficulties the Petitioner could not make the
    remittance in time.

    She draws our attention to the auction notice dated
    28.02.2026 (Annexure-4), whereby the secured asset is
    scheduled to be put to auction today. It is submitted that if such
    auction is allowed to proceed, the Petitioner would suffer
    irreparable prejudice, particularly when he is ready and willing
    Page 1 of 2
    to liquidate the outstanding dues, which according to him is a
    small amount.

    3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon
    perusal of the petition along with I.A. No.6271 of 2026
    supported by affidavit, we are of the considered view that the
    scheduled auction deserves to be deferred till the next date of
    hearing, subject to the Petitioner depositing a sum of ₹13.5
    (Rupees Thirteen lakhs and Fifty Thousand only) with the
    Opposite Party-Bank before 3:00 PM today.

    Failing such deposit, not only shall this interim protection
    stand vacated automatically, but the writ petition shall also run
    the risk of dismissal on that ground itself.

    (Krishna Shripad Dixit)
    Judge

    (Chittaranjan Dash)
    Judge

    AKPradhan/Priyanka

    Signature Not Verified
    Digitally Signed
    Signed by: ANANTA KUMAR PRADHAN
    Designation: Senior Stenographer
    Reason: Authentication
    Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
    Date: 06-Apr-2026 18:01:55

    Page 2 of 2



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here