Suresh Bhagwandas Dhoot vs Kanchan Gopal Rohira And Ors on 2 April, 2026

    0
    17
    ADVERTISEMENT

    [Per Sarang V. Kotwal, J.]

    1. Both these Appeals are decided by this common

    SPONSORED

    judgment because they arise out of the same judgment and decree

    1 of 58

    Deshmane(PS)

    :2: OS-APEALS-171-10+.odt

    dated 14.1.2010 passed in Suit No.1642/1984. For convenience,

    the parties are referred to by their original status in the Suit.

    Appeal No.171/2010 is preferred by the original Plaintiff Kanchan

    Rohira and Appeal No.490/2010 is preferred by the original

    Defendant No.4 Suresh Dhoot.

    2. The Suit was filed by the Plaintiff for specific

    performance of the agreement dated 9.1.1977 executed between

    the Plaintiff and the Defendant No.1 Nirmal Constructions Private

    Limited. Initially, the suit was filed only against the Defendant

    No.1. However, during pendency of the Suit, the Defendant No.1

    had informed the Plaintiff that the flat which was the subject

    matter of the agreement was already sold by the Defendant No.1 to

    the Defendant No.3 M/s. Ravi Overseas Corporation by an

    agreement for sale dated 18.11.1981. The Defendant No.2 Girish

    Jalani had informed that he was an employee of the Defendant

    No.3 and was in occupation of the said flat in that capacity. The

    Defendant No.3, in turn, sold the said flat to the Defendant No.4

    vide agreement for sale dated 12.5.1986.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here