Harilal Pichode vs Sheikh Jakir Hussain on 18 March, 2026

    0
    35
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Madhya Pradesh High Court

    Harilal Pichode vs Sheikh Jakir Hussain on 18 March, 2026

               NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:22524
    
    
    
    
                                                                     1                        MCRC-16583-2019
                                   IN   THE       HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                        AT JABALPUR
                                                               BEFORE
                                                  HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B. P. SHARMA
                                                         ON THE 18 th OF MARCH, 2026
                                                 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 16583 of 2019
                                                             HARILAL PICHODE
                                                                   Versus
                                                           SHEIKH JAKIR HUSSAIN
                              Appearance:
                                     Shri Sameer Qureshi - Advocate for petitioner.
    
                                                                      ORDER
    

    This application under Section 378(4) of the Cr.P.C, 1973 has been filed by
    the complainant/victim against the judgment dated 25.02.2019 passed by the
    Judicial Magistrate First Class, Balaghat (MP) in NIA No.17 of 2018, whereby the
    learned trial Court has acquitted the respondent (herein) of the charges under
    Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

    2. Aforesaid criminal case was instituted on the basis of private complaint filed
    by the victim/applicant.

    SPONSORED

    3. The question before this Court is whether instant petition is covered under
    proviso to Section 413 of BNSS (Section 372 of Cr.P.C.).

    4. The aforesaid issue is no longer res integra in light of the judgment of
    Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc.,
    2025 SCC Online SC 1320. The issue arose in said adjudication was whether an
    appeal would be maintainable under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of
    Criminal Procedure, 1973 against an order of acquittal passed in a case instituted
    upon a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,
    1881 by treating the complainant as a victim within the meaning prescribed under

    Signature Not Verified
    Signed by: TAJAMMUL
    HUSSAIN KHAN
    Signing time: 3/20/2026
    11:35:01 AM
    NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:22524

    2 MCRC-16583-2019
    Section 2(wa) of the Cr.P.C.

    5. It is observed by Hon’ble Apex Court in paragraphs 9 and 10 of Celestium
    Financial (supra) case as under:-

    “9 . In the circumstances, we find that Section 138 of the Act being in the nature of a
    penal provision by a deeming fiction against an accused who is said to have
    committed an offence under the said provision, if acquitted, can be proceeded against
    by a victim of the said offence, namely, the person who is entitled to the proceeds of
    a cheque which has been dishonoured, in terms of the proviso to Section 372 of the
    CrPC, as a victim. As already noted, a victim of an offence could also be a
    complainant. In such a case, an appeal can be preferred either under the proviso to
    Section 372 or under Section 378 by such a victim. In the absence of the proviso to
    Section 372, a victim of an offence could not have filed an appeal as such, unless he
    was also a complainant, in which event he could maintain an appeal if special leave to
    appeal had been granted by the High Court and if no such special leave was granted
    then his appeal would not be maintainable at all. On the other hand, if the victim of
    an offence, who may or may not be the complainant, proceeds under the proviso to
    Section 372 of the CrPC, then in our view, such a victim need not seek special leave
    to appeal from the High Court. In other words, the victim of an offence would have
    the right to prefer an appeal, inter alia, against an order of acquittal in terms of the
    proviso to Section 372 without seeking any special leave to appeal from the High
    Court only on the grounds mentioned therein. A person who is a complainant under
    Section 200 of the CrPC who complains about the offence committed by a person
    who is charged as an accused under Section 138 of the Act, thus has the right to
    prefer an appeal as a victim under the proviso to Section 372 of the CrPC.

    10. As already noted, the proviso to Section 372 of the CrPC was inserted in the
    statute book only with effect from 31.12.2009. The object and reason for such
    insertion must be realised and must be given its full effect to by a court. In view of
    the aforesaid discussion, we hold that the victim of an offence has the right to prefer
    an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the CrPC, irrespective of whether he is
    a complainant or not. Even if the victim of an offence is a complainant, he can still
    proceed under the proviso to Section 372 and need not advert to sub-section (4) of
    Section 378 of the CrPC.”

    6. Having regard to the law laid down in the aforesaid case as well as the
    factual matrix of the instant case, this Court is of the considered view that in the
    present appeal, appellant as a victim has a right to prefer an appeal under the
    proviso to Section 413 of the BNSS, 2023 (Section 372 of Cr.P.C., 1973) and he
    may proceed with accordingly and it is not at all needed to advert to sub section 4
    of Section 419 of the BNSS, 2023 [378(4) of Cr.P.C., 1973]. Hence, liberty is
    reserved to the victim/appellant herein to file an appeal before the competent
    Court, having regard to the proviso to Section 413 of BNSS, 2023 (372 of Cr.P.C.,

    Signature Not Verified
    Signed by: TAJAMMUL
    HUSSAIN KHAN
    Signing time: 3/20/2026
    11:35:01 AM
    NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:22524

    3 MCRC-16583-2019
    1973) within four months from today.

    7. However, it is made clear that if appeal was filed before this Court within
    limitation or if appeal was not filed within limitation before this Court but issue
    of limitation has already been decided by this Court and the delay in filing the
    appeal has been condoned and appeal before concerned Sessions Court is filed
    within the period of four months from today, then, issue of limitation shall not be
    raised by respondent(s) or by the Appellate Court, but if appeal was not filed
    before this Court within limitation as prescribed in the Limitation Act or any
    application for condonation of delay is pending today, then, the issue of
    limitation/the same shall be decided by the Appellate Court in accordance with
    provisions of law.

    8. Certified copy of documents, if any, filed by the victim/applicant in the
    instant petition, shall be returned back to victim/applicant after substituting
    photocopy of the same.

    9. Record of the trial Court, if available, shall be sent back immediately to the
    concerned Court.

    10. Petition filed by the applicant/victim is disposed of in term as above.

    (B. P. SHARMA)
    JUDGE

    THK

    Signature Not Verified
    Signed by: TAJAMMUL
    HUSSAIN KHAN
    Signing time: 3/20/2026
    11:35:01 AM



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here