Mohammad Yaqoob Beigh vs Union Territory Through Police Station on 5 March, 2026

    0
    36
    ADVERTISEMENT

    CRM(M) 640/2025

    1.The investigation in case FIR No. 119/2022 under Sections 8/15 and 29

    SPONSORED

    of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

    (hereinafter referred to as the „NDPS Act‟ for short) and Section 207

    of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, of Police Station, Kulgam

    culminated into a final report/charge-sheet against three accused

    persons, including the present petitioner namely Mohammad Yaqoob

    Beigh S/o Mohammad Abdullah Beigh R/o Jan Mohalla, Shopian,

    under the aforesaid sections of law.

    2.The accused, except the petitioner, came to be arrested during

    investigation and, as such, they have been facing the trial right from

    the beginning. That the present petitioner, as an accused in the case,

    could not be arrested by the Police Station concerned during the

    investigation of the case on account of the alleged fact of his going

    1 Bail App 13/2026 c/w CRM(M) 640/2025
    missing without his whereabouts being immediately known. The

    Police Station concerned, accordingly, made a prayer in the final

    report/challan that proceedings in terms of the provisions of Section

    299 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (erstwhile Central Code,

    now repealed but applicable in the case and hereinafter referred to as

    the „Code‟ for short), corresponding to the provisions of Section 325

    of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surkasha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred

    to as the „BNSS‟ for short) may be initiated as against the petitioner-

    accused. At the presentation of the charge sheet, the statement of the

    IO of the case came to be recorded and the ld. Trial Court proceeded

    at the trial of the case.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here