― Advertisement ―

HomeMd. Janhagir @ Janhagir vs The State Of Bihar on 9 March,...

Md. Janhagir @ Janhagir vs The State Of Bihar on 9 March, 2026

Patna High Court – Orders

Md. Janhagir @ Janhagir vs The State Of Bihar on 9 March, 2026

Author: Sandeep Kumar

Bench: Sandeep Kumar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53235 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-657 Year-2019 Thana- PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE District-
                                                         Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Janhagir @ Janhagir S/o Md. Kalam @ Kalam R/o Vill.- Kamlapur
                 Colony, PS- Raniganj, PO- Pachira, Distt.- Araria, Bihar

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Jubeda Khootan W/o Md. Janhagir, D/o Md. Usman R/o Vill.- Bharkona,
                 PS- Mirganj, Distt.- Purnia, Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam
                                                Mr. Kumar Jay
                                                Mr. Hazique Shams Ali
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   09-03-2026

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

with Complaint Case No. 657 of 2019 for the offence under

Sections 498A, 314, 307, 379, 120B, 494 of the Indian Penal

Code and Section ¾ of the DP Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and

others are accused of assaulting and torturing the victim for

demand of dowry.

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the

petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been

implicated in this case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53235 of 2025(5) dt.09-03-2026
2/3

5. Learned APP for the State and the learned counsel

for the O.P. No. 2. have opposed the application of the

petitioner.

6. Considering the submission of the parties and in

light of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the

case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8

SCC 273, this application for grant of anticipatory bail is

allowed.

7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his

arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four

weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing

bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Purnea/concerned Court below in

connection with Complaint Case No. 657 of 2019 subject to the

conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS and with further

condition that:

(I). The petitioner is directed to pay
a maintenance amount of Rs. 7000/- from the
month of March 2026 to the
complainant/informant. The maintenance for the
month of March 2026 shall be paid to the
complainant/informant within ten days from
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53235 of 2025(5) dt.09-03-2026
3/3

today, and thereafter, the maintenance amount
shall be paid to the complainant/informant
every month before the 10th day of each month.

8. It is made clear that the order of maintenance

passed by this Court shall be subject to the outcome of the

maintenance case in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court

concerned, if any.

9. Needless to state that, if the petitioner fails to abide

by the terms and conditions, as stated hereinabove, the State

shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application, before the

learned concerned Court below for cancellation of bail granted

to the petitioner.

10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the

Principal District & Sessions Judge, Purnea through FAX for its

compliance forthwith.

(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T
 



Source link