― Advertisement ―

HomeDipen Chawda vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 10 March, 2026

Dipen Chawda vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 10 March, 2026

2. The genesis of the FIR lies in a disclosure made by the Enforcement

Directorate vide letter dated 11.07.2023 under Section 66 of the Prevention

of Money Laundering Act in ECIR No. 11/2022, upon which the State

agency initiated the present criminal proceedings. The applicant was

initially not an accused in the early stages of investigation. Subsequently,

the applicant came to be named only in the 6th supplementary charge-

sheet filed on 24.11.2025, wherein the prosecution has arrayed as many

as 117 accused persons and cited more than 1110 witnesses, relying upon

over 990documents.

3. The prosecution case against the present applicant rests primarily

on selectively extracted WhatsApp chats allegedly exchanged between

certain co-accused persons, namely Anwar Dewar, Anil Tuteja,

Soumya Chaurasiya and Vikash Agrawal. Significantly, there is no direct

communication alleged between the present applicant and the said co-

accused persons, and the only assertion made is that the applicant was

acquainted with co-accused Anwar Dewar. It is further alleged that

certain code words appearing in the chats, such as the letters “S.C.”

allegedly referring to Soumya Chaurasiya and the expression “files”

allegedly representing monetary transactions, have been interpreted by the

investigating agency as indicating illegal gratification. However, no

independent material has been placed on record to establish the

authenticity, meaning, or context of such alleged code words, and the

entire inference is based solely on the interpretation of the investigating

agency.



Source link