Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

HomeAjay Yadav @ Ajay Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on...

Ajay Yadav @ Ajay Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 9 March, 2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his

arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under

Section 30(a), 32, 33, 36 and 41(i) of the Excise Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner has antecedent of eight cases under the Excise Act

and allegation is of recovery of 6000 litres of spirit from four

different vehicles.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was

recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of

any of the seized vehicles and he came to be implicated based
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12676 of 2026(2) dt.09-03-2026

on secret information, which is the easiest way to implicate

someone. It is next submitted that police in majority of cases

implicating innocent persons either at the behest of Chaukidar,

local person, secret information and confessional statement in a

mechanical manner without holding a proper investigation. It is

next submitted that petitioner in similar also came to be

implicated earlier in different excise cases



Source link