Sanjeev Kumar Sharma @ Sanjeev Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 3 August, 2026

    0
    9
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court – Orders

    Sanjeev Kumar Sharma @ Sanjeev Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 3 August, 2026

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22715 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-433 Year-2025 Thana- GANDHIMAIDAN District- Patna
                     ======================================================
                     Sanjeev Kumar Sharma @ Sanjeev Kumar Son of Shri Gobardhan Sharma
                     R/o Village - Dhanauja, P.S. - Maheeshi, Dist. - Saharsa, Bihar.
    
                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                           Versus
               1.    The State of Bihar
               2.    Dr. Om Shankar S/o- Kumar Kishore Yadav R/o- Barateni PO-Lashkari PS-
                     Udakishunganj Madhepura
    
                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Abhijeet Gautam, Adv
                     For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
                                           ORAL ORDER
    
    4   03-08-2026

    Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the

    learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2

    SPONSORED

    and the learned APP for the State.

    2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

    with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 433 of 2025, for allegedly

    having committed offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471,

    406, 504, 506, 120(B) of the I.P.C.

    3. As per the prosecution case, which has been lodged

    on the basis of the written report submitted by the informant to

    the effect that cousin brother of the informant namely Minku

    Kumar entered into a contract with the petitioner for starting a

    Bio-gas/Petrol Pump project at Madhepura. It has further been
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22715 of 2026(4) dt.03-08-2026
    2/8

    alleged that the management of I.B.F.C. company took his

    signature along with documents for the dealership of the Bio-

    gas Plant at Madhepura. On different dates, he gave Rs.

    35,00,000/- lakhs in account and Rs. 5,00,000/- in cash. It has

    further been alleged that during course of entire transactions, the

    officials and employees of the Indian Biozola Corporation,

    Patna together hatched a criminal conspiracy and committed

    dishonest embezzlement. During entire contract period and even

    after the expiry of the contract period, no officer or employee of

    the I.B.F.C. provided any product or service to the company

    namely, M/s Saraswati Biofuels Center. It has further been

    alleged that the father of the informant has carried out

    standardized construction on the land selected for the petrol

    pump, which cost Rs. 10,00,000/-, and the land has remained

    unoccupied ever since. Neither the products, nor services were

    supplied as per the contract, nor was the Biofuels Centre got

    operational, causing significant economic and social loss.

    Despite completing all the formalities of the company, the

    employees have not provided any type of services for several

    years. Further allegation in the FIR is that he repeatedly

    contacted the company but no solution was provided and then

    the cousin of the informant and his father went to meet them at
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22715 of 2026(4) dt.03-08-2026
    3/8

    old address, however, the office was found to be locked. It has

    further been alleged that when they tried to meet the officials of

    the company, they threatened the informant to face dire

    consequences. The officials of the company conspired and

    forged a one-sided contract by getting signatures on the plain

    paper and stamp paper so that his father’s life saving could be

    defrauded and legal action could not be taken against the

    persons named in the FIR.

    4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

    the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case by

    the informant with ulterior motive. He submits that dispute, if

    any, is related to commercial transactions and to put pressure

    upon the petitioner and others the present FIR has been lodged.

    He submits that the company of the petitioner invited

    applications in a specified form for shortlisting the candidates

    for establishment of Petrol Pump of Bio fuel Company. After

    submissions of the application, the informant was shortlisted

    and thereafter a letter of intent was issued to all the shortlisted

    persons. It was directed to the shortlisted candidates, including

    the informant, to get the environmental clearance from the State

    authorities or the District Magistrate, so as to get the

    establishment of Petrol Pump, however the informant failed to
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22715 of 2026(4) dt.03-08-2026
    4/8

    get the required clearance as mandated by law and therefore his

    allotment got cancelled. He further submits that petitioner did

    not take any signature on any plain paper, but from perusal of

    the agreement dated 03.02.2020, it would appear that the said

    agreement was signed by both the parties and therefore the

    allegation made in the FIR are completely false. He submits that

    so far the allegation of the informant that the petitioner has

    taken Rs. 40,00,000/-, is completely false. He has received only

    an amount to the tune of Rs. 24,99,651/-, which would be

    evident from the ledger report brought on record by the

    petitioner by way of Annexure- 4. He further submits that no

    cash transaction was made in between the parties. He further

    submits that since the informant did not get any no objection

    from the authorities concerned, therefore Bio-fuel Pump could

    not be established. The learned counsel for the petitioner further

    submits that he is ready and willing to return the amount, which

    has been accepted by him in the present petition i.e. 24,99,651/-.

    He submits that the petitioner is an accused in three other cases

    and for which he has already filed anticipatory bail petitions

    bearing Cr. Misc. No. 25818 of 2026, Cr. Misc. No. 23158 of

    2026 and Cr. Misc. No. 71792 of 2023. He submits that three

    cases are of almost similar nature and in all the cases, this
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22715 of 2026(4) dt.03-08-2026
    5/8

    Hon’ble Court has directed for taking no coercive steps against

    the petitioner and directed for settlement of the cases through

    mediation and has referred the matter to the Patna High Court

    Mediation Centre, where the matters are still pending.

    5. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf

    of the Informant while opposing the prayer for anticipatory bail

    of the petitioner and submits that he is not ready to settle the

    case and he wants his entire Rs. 50,00,000/- and unless the same

    will not be given, he will not settle the dispute with the

    petitioner. He submits that true fact is that the petitioner had

    obtained Rs. 35,00,000/-, in account and Rs. 5,00,000/-, in cash

    from the informant. Further the father of the informant has

    already invested around Rs. 10,00,000/- in development of the

    land, on which the petitioner gave him assurance for opening

    Bio-fuel Center. He submits that the petitioner not only cheated

    the informant herein, but he is in the habit of cheating innocent

    persons, like the informant, which would be apparent from

    criminal cases pending against him of similar nature. The

    learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner

    with a dishonest intention induced the informant and his family

    member to give him money for opening a Bio-Fuel Centre and

    subsequently the said Centre was not opened and the petitioner
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22715 of 2026(4) dt.03-08-2026
    6/8

    did not return the amount to the informant.

    6. The learned APP for the State also opposes the

    prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that three criminal

    cases of similar nature are pending against the petitioner and

    therefore he does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail.

    7. Having considered the rival submissions and after

    going through the records, it appears that there is an allegation

    of giving Rs. 35,00,000/-, to the petitioner by the informant and

    his family members in the account of the petitioner and Rs.

    5,00,000/- in cash to him. Further it has been stated that the

    father of the informant has already invested Rs. 10,00,000/- for

    development of the said land on which Bio-fuel Center was to

    be opened. It appears that an agreement was entered into

    between the cousin brother of the informant as well as the father

    of the informant with the authorized signatories and the

    company namely, Indian Biozola Corporation on 03.02.2020. It

    has been alleged in the FIR that from different accounts Rs.

    35,00,000/- was transferred in the bank account of the petitioner

    and other office bearers of the company. Due to not obtaining

    the environmental clearance certificate, which was to be

    obtained by the informant and his family members, the petrol

    Pump could not be established. The petitioner in this petition
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22715 of 2026(4) dt.03-08-2026
    7/8

    has stated that he has received Rs. 24,99,651/- and which he is

    ready and willing to pay to the informant and his family

    members, however the learned counsel appearing on behalf of

    the informant, on instructions from the informant submits that

    the informant is not ready to accept the same. It further appears

    that the petitioner filed Cr. Misc. No. 25818 of 2026 before this

    Hon’ble Court and a learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court

    while directing for no coercive steps to be taken against the

    petitioner, referred the matter to the Patna High Court Mediation

    Center for settlement with the informant of the said case.

    Further he filed Cr. Misc Case No. 23158 of 2026, however the

    same is pending for consideration before this Hon’ble Court.

    The petitioner filed Cr. Misc. No. 71792 of 2023 and a learned

    Co-ordinate Bench of this Court filed vide order dated

    29.02.2024 granted the anticipatory bail to the petitioner. It

    further appears that although the petitioner is ready and willing

    to pay the amount of Rs. 24,99,651/-, to the informant, however,

    the informant is not ready to accept and an agreement is there in

    between the parties, therefore, the informant to put pressure

    upon the petitioner has filed the present case and is even not

    ready to accept the amount, which the petitioner has agreed to

    return. The petitioner has a civil remedy available to him for
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22715 of 2026(4) dt.03-08-2026
    8/8

    recovery of the said amount and to settle the dispute, but to put

    pressure upon the petitioner, the present case has been lodged.

    Considering the above, let the petitioner, above named in the

    event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from

    today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds

    of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

    like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional

    Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Gandhi Maidan

    P.S. Case No. 433 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid

    down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and subject to the

    following condition:-

    (I) That the learned court concerned shall verify the

    criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it

    is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal

    antecedent, the court concerned shall take step for cancellation

    of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail

    bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be

    delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

    shital/-                                             (Ritesh Kumar, J)
    
    U          T
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here