Rajesh Prasad @ Rajesh Kumar @ Ravi vs The State Of Bihar on 27 July, 2026

    0
    3
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Supreme Court – Daily Orders

    Rajesh Prasad @ Rajesh Kumar @ Ravi vs The State Of Bihar on 27 July, 2026

    Author: Aravind Kumar

    Bench: Aravind Kumar

                                          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
    
    
                                        CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.        OF 2026
                                            @ SLP (CRL.) NO.11942/2026
    
    
    
                             RAJESH PRASAD @ RAJESH KUMAR @ RAVI              APPELLANT
    
                                                         VERSUS
    
    
    
                             STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.                         RESPONDENTS
    
                                                        WITH
    
                                        CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.       OF 2026
                                           @ SLP (CRL.) NO.12708/2026
    
    
                                        CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.       OF 2026
                                           @ SLP (CRL.) NO.12515/2026
    
    
    
                                                        O R D E R
    

    1. Leave granted.

    2. Mr. Anshul Narayan, learned counsel

    SPONSORED

    appearing for the respondent – State on advance

    notice has vehemently opposed the grant of bail.

    3. Appellants who are arraigned as accused

    Signature Not Verified Nos.5, 10 and 12, respectively, in FIR No.8 of
    Digitally signed by
    NEHA GUPTA
    Date: 2026.07.28

    1
    18:49:23 IST
    Reason:
    2025, registered at P.S.: Women Police Station,

    District: West Champaran, for the offences

    punishable under Sections 64, 65(1), 143(1), 145,

    95, 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023,

    Sections 6, 8 and 12 of Protection of Children

    from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Sections 75

    and 79 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, Sections 3,

    4, 5 and 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention)

    Act,1956 and Sections 16, 17, and 18 of the

    Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976, are

    seeking regular bail.

    4. The record would disclose that investigation

    is concluded and charge-sheet has been filed and

    two witnesses have already been examined.

    5. It is the case of the prosecution that minor

    girls were found in various orchestra groups had

    been trafficked and they were sexually exploited.

    Even according to the FIR, the appellants were

    neither the owner nor Manager of the orchestra

    group and they were only the employees

    (Announcer) in Chhoti New Musical Orchestra

    2
    Dhamaka Group.

    6. It is also pertinent to note at this

    juncture, for the limited purpose of considering

    the prayer for bail, that the statements of the

    rescued girls which have been recorded under

    Section 183 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

    Sanhita, 2023, particularly of the two victims

    associated with the orchestra group where

    appellants were working are perused and same

    would disclose that there were no evidence of

    sexual assault. The three co-accused Gena Sah,

    Rajat Sardar @ Rajjat Kumar @ Rajat Kumar and

    Subhash Kumar have been granted regular bail by

    the jurisdictional High Court. Hence, appellants

    are also entitled for grant of bail on the ground

    of parity.

    7. As such, the impugned order dated 15.05.2026

    passed by the High Court is set aside and

    appellants are ordered to be released on bail on

    such terms and conditions as the jurisdictional

    court deems fit to impose, including the

    3
    condition of directing the appellants to appear

    before the trial court on all dates of hearing

    except when specifically exempted.

    8. The appeals are allowed in the above terms.

    9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand

    disposed of.

    ……………..J.
    (ARAVIND KUMAR)

    ……………..J.
    (VIPUL M. PANCHOLI)

    NEW DELHI;

    JULY 27, 2026.

    
    
    
    
                            4
    ITEM NO.6           COURT NO.11            SECTION II-A
    
              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
    
    Petition(s) for Special       Leave   to    Appeal   (Crl.)
    No(s).11942/2026
    
    

    [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order
    dated 15-05-2026 in CRM No.7621/2026 passed by the
    High Court of Judicature at Patna]

    RAJESH PRASAD @ RAJESH KUMAR @ RAVI Petitioner(s)

    VERSUS

    STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. Respondent(s)

    FOR ADMISSION
    IA No. 187324/2026 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

    WITH
    SLP(Crl) No. 12708/2026 (II-A)
    FOR ADMISSION
    IA No. 200982/2026 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

    SLP(Crl) No. 12515/2026 (II-A)
    FOR ADMISSION
    IA No. 197513/2026 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

    Date : 27-07-2026 These matters were called on for
    hearing today.

    CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
    HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI

    For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishal Ranjan, Adv.

    Mr. Amit Chowdhary, Adv.

    Ms. Yoothica Pallavi, AOR

    For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anshul Narayan, Adv.

    5
    Mr. Ashutosh Chaturvedi, Adv.

    Mr. Prem Prakash, AOR

    Mr. Azmat Hayat Amanullah, AOR
    Ms. Rebecca Mishra, Adv.

    Ms. Ekta Kundu, Adv.

    Ms. Vanshita Gupta, Adv.

    UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the
    following
    O R D E R

    Leave granted.

    Criminal Appeals are allowed in terms of the

    signed order placed on the file.

    Pending application(s), if any, shall stand

    disposed of.

      (NEHA GUPTA)                       (AVGV RAMU)
    COURT MASTER (SH)                COURT MASTER (NSH)
    
    
    
    
                             6
    



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here