Chandan Kumar Mahto @ Chandan Kumar @ … vs The State Of Jharkhand on 23 July, 2026

    0
    6
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jharkhand High Court

    Chandan Kumar Mahto @ Chandan Kumar @ … vs The State Of Jharkhand on 23 July, 2026

    Author: Rajesh Kumar

    Bench: Rajesh Kumar

                                                                 2026:JHHC:21801
    
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                   Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No. 310 of 2026
                                    ----
    

    Chandan Kumar Mahto @ Chandan Kumar @ Chando Mahto, aged about
    40 years, S/o Prabhu Dayal Mahto, R/o village Gondalpura, P.O. & P.S.
    Barkagaon, District-Hazaribagh …. …. Appellant
    Versus

    1. The State of Jharkhand

    SPONSORED

    2. Baldeo Ganjhu, S/o Late Jethu Ganjhu, R/o Village-Gali, P.O. & P.S.
    Barkagaon, District-Hazaribagh …. …. Respondents

    —-

    CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

    —-

    For the Appellant : Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv.
    For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr Mishra, Spl. P.P.
    For the Resp. No.2 : Mr. Manoj Kumar Ram, Adv.

    Mr. Vijay Shanker Jha, Adv.

    —-

    03/Dated: 23.07.2026

    1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 14-A (2) of the
    Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,
    1989.

    2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for the State
    and learned counsel for the victim.

    3. The present appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated
    13.03.2026 rejecting the prayer of regular bail of the appellant in M.C.A.
    Case No.430 of 2026 in (SC/ST Case No.31 of 2025) passed by the learned
    Additional Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Special Judge SC/ST Act Cases,
    Hazaribagh in connection with SC/ST P.S. Case No.02 of 2023, registered
    for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 323, 341, 448, 504, 506 of the
    Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(1)(s), 3(1)(zc) of the SC/ST (PoA)
    Act. The case is presently pending in the court of the learned A.D.J.-VI-
    cum-Spl. Judge SC/ST Act Cases, Hazaribagh.

    4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the
    case is nothing but neighbourhood dispute between the parties and the matter
    has already been settled outside the court. The appellant undertakes to
    2026:JHHC:21801

    participate in the trial. He is in custody since 13.03.2026. On the above
    basis, the prayer for bail has been made.

    5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel
    for the victim has not opposed the prayer for bail.

    6. Considering the above facts, the appellant named above, is directed to
    be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
    Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the
    learned A.D.J.-VI-cum-Spl. Judge SC/ST Act Cases, Hazaribagh in
    connection with SC/ST P.S. Case No.02 of 2023, subject to the condition
    that the appellant will submit self-attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card
    and also submit his mobile number before the learned court below which he
    will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case
    without prior permission of the court.

    7. In the result, the instant appeal stands allowed and disposed of.

    (Rajesh Kumar, J.)

    Dated: 23.07.2026
    Pawan/-

    Uploaded 27.07.2026

    Page | 2 Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.310 of 2026



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here