Manoj Sao @ Manoj Kumar Gupta vs The State Of Bihar on 22 July, 2026

    0
    6
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court – Orders

    Manoj Sao @ Manoj Kumar Gupta vs The State Of Bihar on 22 July, 2026

    Author: Prabhat Kumar Singh

    Bench: Prabhat Kumar Singh

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44031 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2020 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya
                     ======================================================
                     Manoj Sao @ Manoj Kumar Gupta S/o- Sri Kishori Sao @ Kishori Lal Gupta
                     Residents of Village- Navtoli Budhgere P.S- Muffasil District- Gaya
                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                     The State of Bihar
                                                                           ... ... Opposite Party/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Arbind Kumar Singh
                     For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                           ORAL ORDER
    
    2   22-07-2026

    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

    A.P.P. for the State.

    SPONSORED

    2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

    registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323,

    324, 325, 307, 353, 332, 333, 427, 435, 504, 506, 337, 338 of

    the Indian Penal Code.

    3. Accusation is that due to death of one Bittu Saw, 44

    named, including petitioner, and 500 unknown persons staged a

    protest and when police personnel reached there, then mob

    attacked the police party, in which, some of the police party

    sustained injuries.

    4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

    though, petitioner is named in the F.I.R., but no specific overt

    act has been alleged against him. Similarly situated other co-

    accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court,

    vide Annexure P/3. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44031 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026
    2/2

    5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

    anticipatory bail.

    6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

    in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a

    period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner

    be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten

    thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

    satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Gaya

    Muffasil P.S. Case No. 100 of 2020, subject to condition as laid

    down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482(2) of the

    B.N.S.S.

    (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
    anay

    U T



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here