2. Shri. Dipul Ryntathiang vs Ri-Bhoi District on 21 July, 2026

    0
    5
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Meghalaya High Court

    2. Shri. Dipul Ryntathiang vs Ri-Bhoi District on 21 July, 2026

                                                            2026:MLHC:744
    
    
    
    Serial No. 03
    Daily List               HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
                                   AT SHILLONG
    
           Crl.Petn. No. 22 of 2026
                                                     Date of order: 21.07.2026
           1.     Shri. Cleophas B. Syiem
    
           2.     Shri. Dipul Ryntathiang
                                                               ....Petitioners
    
                                        - versus -
    
           1.     The State of Meghalaya represented by Public Prosecutor.
    
           2.     Smti. Asha Wallang, resident of Mawsmai Village, 11th Mile,
                  Nongpoh, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya.
    
           3.   The Officer-In-Charge/P.I. Khanapara Police Station,
                Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya.
                                                         ....Respondents

    Coram:

    Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice
    Appearance:

    For the Petitioners : Mrs. B.S. Goyal, Adv.

    Mr. S. Thapa, Adv.

    For the Respondents : Mrs N.G. Shylla, PP with
    Ms S. Kh. Nongrum, GA

    By this petition, the petitioners are essentially seeking

    quashing of the show-cause notice issued to them in connection

    with the Khanapara P.S. Case No. 18(03)/2026 and,

    consequently, the investigation carried out by the said

    Khanapara Police Station.

    Page 1 of 2

    SPONSORED

    2026:MLHC:744

    2. Mrs. N.G. Shylla, learned PP, informs this Court that

    investigation is complete and charge-sheet has been filed. She

    submits that during the course of investigation, statements have

    been recorded and some articles have been seized.

    3. In view of the statement made by the learned PP, Mrs N.G.

    Shylla, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this

    petition since the reliefs sought in the petition do not survive.

    Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

    4. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the

    merits of the investigation carried out by the Police and as such,

    all contentions of all parties, on merits are kept open.

    5. Needless to state, that the petitioners are always at liberty

    to file appropriate proceeding, as is maintainable in law, before

    the appropriate forum.

    (Revati Mohite Dere)
    Chief Justice

    Signature Not Verified Page 2 of 2
    Digitally signed by SYLVANA
    LIZ KHARBHIH
    Date: 2026.07.21 18:40:29 IST



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here