19410) on 7 May, 2026

Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Urn: Crlmb / 12602U / 2026Vikram Lal S/O … vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jp:19410) on 7 May, 2026

[2026:RJ-JP:19410]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6970/2026

Vikram Lal S/o Rama Ji @ Ramlal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o
Bagri Mohalla, Guradiya Khurd, Police Station Pagariya District
Jhalawar (Raj.) (Presently Confined At Sub Jail Bhawani Mandi
District Jhalawar)
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                   ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kalu Singh Sisodiya
Mr. Ram Pratap Deora
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

SPONSORED

Order

07/05/2026

1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is

filed by the applicant-accused Vikram Lal S/o Rama Ji @

Ramlal, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered

as FIR No.253/2025 dated 29.05.2025 registered at P.S.

Bhawani Mandi, District – Jhalawar, for the offence under

Sections 8/15 of NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant

has been falsely implicated in the matter and the

investigation against him is complete and he is no more

required in investigation. He further submits that there are

no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the

jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the

(Uploaded on 07/05/2026 at 04:07:39 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/05/2026 at 11:52:11 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:19410] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-6970/2026]

applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate

with trial, which will take time.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no recovery

has been effected from the petitioner accused and at the

first instance, the investigation has been kept pending

against the petitioner accused under Section 193(9) of

BNSS. He further submits that the present petitioner is

arrayed as an accused on basis of intimation of Rahul Kumar

and Deepak Lal. He further submits that accused Deepak Lal,

Rahul Kumar and Govind are already enlarged on bail and a

charge-sheet has been filed.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail

application and submitted that the allegations are grave and

serious in nature. He has also filed a report received from

concerned Police Station.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned

Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record.

6. On basis of a recovery effected on 29.05.2025 by Dhanraj

Gochar, S.I., P.S. Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar from

Rahul Kumar and Govind of contraband poppy straw, an FIR

No.253/2025 was registered at Police Station Bhawani

Mandi, District Jhalawar. The police report indicate that 3 KG

720 Grams poppy straw was recovered from Govind and 5

KG and 715 Grams poppy straw were recovered from Rahul

Kumar. The police has kept investigation pending against

Vikram Lal and Deepak Lal under Section 193(9) of BNSS

while filing charge-sheet against Rahul Kumar and Govind. A

Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has granted bail to Rahul

(Uploaded on 07/05/2026 at 04:07:39 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/05/2026 at 11:52:11 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:19410] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-6970/2026]

Kumar and Govind on 31.07.2025. After arrest of Deepak for

charge under Section 8/29 of NDPS Act, he was further

granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on

13.03.2026. After investigation, a charge-sheet has already

been filed. There is no criminal antecedents against the

petitioner accused and no recovery has been effected from

petitioner.

7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we

have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in

the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time.

The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore,

looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case

and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case,

the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-

accused.

8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant-

accused Vikram Lal S/o Rama Ji @ Ramlal, is hereby

allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released

on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with

two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial

Court with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with

evidence or influence the witness in any manner.

(ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any

criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal

offence punishable under the Law.

(Uploaded on 07/05/2026 at 04:07:39 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/05/2026 at 11:52:11 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:19410] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-6970/2026]

(iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of

the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as

and when asked to appear before the Trial Court.

(iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail

granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be

canceled.

9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the

Trial Court through E-mail.

(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J

MR/67

(Uploaded on 07/05/2026 at 04:07:39 PM)
(Downloaded on 07/05/2026 at 11:52:11 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)