ADVERTISEMENT
Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati
Wis. Nayagreeva Farms And Developers vs Vont As] Ae Eed Ned A Wo Ry Ie on 3 March, 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAYVAT! iSPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION} TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX (PRESENT: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B RRISHNA MOHAN WPYS80 7/2085, WP/6509/2025, WPS 256/2025, WPYSS0Q/2025, WPI8SS 2/205, WP/S396/2025, WP/8237/2025, WPSSS 8/2085, WP8S5 1/2028, WP/8385/2025, WPrad02/2028, WP/S406/2025, WP/OTOS/2028, WP/O 7104/2028, -WPY910S/2025, WPiSTO8/2028, WP/O11 0/2028, WPIOTi 120g. WPS1 (2/2028, WRIST TS/2028, WP/9774/2025, WP8394 2025: WIP 3627/2028, WPA ST S6/20285, WPM SOg6/2024, WPePM6982i2024, WPeITTOOa/2024, WRIA TOOSR2024, WPIVTOTU2046, WPATO2S2024, WPITT1Sac028, WRITS? 4areo2d, WPiia7eg/2024, WPiGSTde/202d, WPSTOU2024, WPRASTSS 2084, WPIo7SNa0es, WPOorsa/2026, WPINSTS62024, WPITSTar/20es, WPIiO7oa/2024, WPHOBOU2024, WPHS8?a2024, WPIMSdo7a/g024, WPiHS88T/2024, WPI8esa/2024, WPNSSS8/2024, WPR/T9o80/2024 WP NO: 6507 OF 2025: : Beiween: Wis. Nayagreeva Farms and Developers, A registered Parinership frm under ve the provisions of Indian Partnership Act, 1992, Having Hs Office at Door.No.8 20-201, Flat No So2, 4° Filner, Sukshetra - East Point, East Point Colony, Visakhapainam- §300(17 Rep. by Ns Managing Pariner, Gadde Brahmell, Aged 45 years, S/o, Sri Muneswara Rao. Petitioner AND 1. The Stefe of Andhra Praciesh, Rep. by Hs) Frincinal Sees Depariment of Revenus, Secretariat, Velagaoudi, Amaravall, Guntur Custrict, 2. the District Collector of Visakh anainam, Visakhapainam. , < seat ? Masnondaents > 3 " oe ¢ The Revenue Divisional Offic 3 oe \ 3 s Lh% " » Pa sea Pe . a f 5 Oe <5 © a ey Ba pm: i <n a a a a oe a rs es OG fe <3 . aoe . St Lf SS "4 'oat pod ne ea CG 'nal 24 ote thee £5 gee we ay saan eon Sy, tom oe vs vont as] Ae eed ned a wo ry ie bee pon A Ea ' len arene eo "we oA oS be beoe a ate. as +e senan Seed Soa tet naaen + 4 ES Sooe we ed kos me we weeny aed we aol rl we 283 pee ' = 8 £ & & & oe ey ie oe ee peat mre eeee seeds 3 ade ns aoe ee ao £5 "od Ls o a cee (6 % een oo 'pees oe es oor w pao oe ne opt 5 ¢ 5 4 en Be on $4 P; We "3 Zs ae ; wd Joe $93 nn eg es "a o3 '2 i ap a if "he Je Fae oh. £4 23 t foe "a bok wh 3 oh, Ae f% pane re $37 nr ar, on ane we 82 oy MG 6 Out 8 x tg "s, mpfane + " loaned Sn A coe oo . & ey Si ee a sa yh 4 £ betes eS A Lz "nae aioe es. Me yon i oe eh oa fry "ye tA a, 4 hee? x & - @ & BM BB ew OR s co ar anc are 60 fp oe BF an an: soe, ent were ee 4 we area ence me oo fs Be om oS OR UE UO UG OO TS woen oes £3 te EN An £3 wen rs - 'heat ©, eal e ead gee Ia eo 7 Zo Sb A cect nt Spon ei os a as Oe os ee oe tot aoe Jrroe anon 4tf , yee bees aiped ad yh% cand my pid ae66es 'agen rs i 'heag 53 Aa ge fenoe my £% Le ee wit , fe £% Sone we "es a twee Seeee £% see oe ran C3 wy 5 4 a coe, " Lf "et » tod oneen. Bh: G&G BE & Oe me Be Am & GS ds &s 3 8S heed DA 7% aA ey bh, ' gn tees. 4, Pale i bee rer 4 fe Oy. nr rc wm, ee om, th © ys eee wd fe hoon ye feed An og " : hen thy oy of oS rae) " FB my rn arn Lo] a oy ca Ske f ae wm cau, as Ep hen ra a iy > © a) A 5 a ; ee a3 foe wy ioe eg w Zz con ne " ee Be oe Ch. ts : See weags, 5 ed " Ch ca wen Ieee mes ennen, 2 % 4 ry rn Ty ve Fn @ eg 4 is Cp fee a Oi ar oo ae yee "ane ow ee ett aa * : ee he . A Sees an, ron tee eat Yee "C3 cn fofor. on w ec Goren a? one a Sedoe head 7 he £"% fone is . wet ¢ en ens en Gd Co = ooo £4 oo se 8 Sr = BN eo a. eS 2B gs mM eo GO eB EM SS A EE bee nd ; we EE ion a A rer cote ba, age "w ke fe ot A at a a Se a ced hes, "ye 1G 7 re - £t ore hove Seat pated rene mee "A .. wn, weet , 'cet " pas ae po ae we re a ar , TE nape ewe Ss on ren ae) a eee on raed we agree poocrmm Si 3 aed tone oy Neat! "B& 6 & (R Boy & BD wr = a coe ss ree Bytes 2 oa ea % 3 bbed oe o, Sidon, & ra or 'oe a bhed CS a "% tai a a hy 0 : oe rd oP. h 2 'i eed 5, i "0% fo oe « . mS m 4 wh © Ae fe, we MR ew, ed OE 3 He ow wt . i ie + we ne ifs pee - £S ae i te ws wee 55) fnew wd +b ay . is aod con uae pe en; ee r Sa GG 4s ce be , wo a ioe SS $ ee "hens mo, heed = 0 a @ & mo im om & & & ee & po Bs a a rr as Yon oy 5 MO C3 BS owe Uy tes ky mS a cd ec a a ee gs eh ce fee @ $t coe cs ? Oy ae ow ee nm jon a em OG > @& te Ge ee te Oe ry oo OB "eh My an. ie 'w ee pe en et a %B we gee Py ths Z > 1% foc ns oo EE 3 ae ms OF sep aS Seve % CA agen 5 Pe oes y e bore OY co] oF ee OS 55) one, wens we s, " hat Ps Sone ante, he gr Ks ca soot selon, £3 nines ry wee. ng re nS i'. 3 my Some a ss i, ee Sen eens % 6G yr Cae ome ce, Sd wenn im gree WHA 2) Dabo + g as . Ae FY 8 y a} THe z f _y " x3 bby APa t Pay TE 0 3 RE 4 PS mde & IA NO: 2 OF 2028 : ae occupation of the Petitioner ane ihe construction activily being underiaken by the Pellioner in schedule property admeasuting an extent of Ac. 12.51 cents in Sy.Ne.o2/3 of Endacea Vilage, Visakhapainam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Pending di isposal 0 of Wr No.bS07 of 2025, an the He of the High Court. The Pelton coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed In support thereof and the order of the Hi igh Gourt order dated 49.03.2025, 20.12.2025, 27.01.2028 & 17.02.2028 made herein and upon nearing the arguments of Sri Ajay Kumar Kanaparthi, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of GP for Revenue for the Respondents: WP No.6 508 of 2025 Ssctweer: Ainampudi Nageewara Rao, S/o, _Ayyanna, Aged about 6S years Réo PNG. 1409 Royavaripaianm, Enamadala, Guntur S22019 Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Reg. by Hs Pri Secy, Departrnent of Revenue, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. P.3 Fhe Districl Collector of Visakhapainam, Visakhapatnam. The Tahsidar, Visakhapainam Rural, Visakhapatnam fe G8 Mis. Hayagresva Farms ard Developers, DoorNo.6-20-20/ Fiat No.502, 4° Floor, Sukshetra - East Point, East Point Colony, Visakhapainan: S30017. Rem by its Managing Partner - Respondents Petition under Aricie 225 of the Consttution of Inca praying thal in ihe circumstances stated in ihe affidavit fied therewith, the High Court may be pleased fo issue an appropriate We it or order or direction more particularly In the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actlon of the Respondents more particularly the action of 2° Respondent herein in issuing proceedings vide Ro No GOS7/SOOGE2S DL Too. 2025 Gered upon the Peltioner on 11 OS. 2025) by which the Respondents are seeking fo resume the land 2 BY g admeasuring an axtant of Ac 19.84 Cents | In Sy. No.82/S of Yendada Village, Vishakhapainam Rural Mandal, Vishakhapainam District, more particularly a extent of 385 Sq.¥ds in Flot No. 14 as being fMlecal, arbitrary, unjust, without jurisdigtion, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, violative of the provisions 2 exo tt of the Transfer of Property Act, 1883, C Contra ary to the Order DN. 1S42 2077 o this Hon'ble Court in WP Nos. 30413 of 8014 & 26853 of 3018, and violative of Artcies 14, 21 and SOOA of the Canstit ution of india and Consequently, set aside the proceedings vide proceedings vide Re.No.SOS7/S00R/E2, DL tN 10.09.2025 issued by the Ressancdent No. IANO: 1 OF 2035 Fetition under Section 154 OFC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fled in support of the petition, the High Court may be nigased to suspend the omeratian of proceedings vide Ro No S0ars/enneyEs | Dt 10.03.2025 issued by 2° Respondent, more particularly fo an extent of 385 So.Yds in Plot No. 14, Pending disposal of WP No 6800 of 2f25 on the Se of fhe High Court, The Petition caming on for hearing, uson perusing the Pettion and the affidavit Hed in support thereof and fhe arder of the High Court order dated 19.08.2025, 20.72.2025, 2701 2068 & UP O2 20868 made herein and upon earing the arguments of Sr Jawai § Saraih Chandra, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of GR FOR REVENUE Advocate for the Respondents: WRIT PETITION NO: 8286 OF 2028 Sehween: gery Gadde Someswara Rao, So G. Ramachandra Rao, Aged about 62 years, Ric Door No 1247, Gadde Var Street, Butfayagqudem, Ganapavaram Mandal, West District 34447 . Petitioner . The State of Andhra Pradesh, Ren. by iis Pri.Secy, Department af my J aaa Revenue, Secretarial, Velagaoud!, Ameravall, Guntur District ¢ =. The District Collector of Visakhapatnam, Visakhapainam. . \he Tahsiidar, Visakhapainam Rural, Visakhapatnam bo. {. Mis. Hayagreeva Farms and Developers, Door. No.6-20-20/1, | Flat No. 502, 4" Finor, Sukshetra - East Point, East Point Galony, isakhapainain: SS00T7. Rep by its Managing Partner S. The Gresier Vishakhapainamn Municinal Corporation, Vishakhapainam, Rep by fis Cominissioner. . dlaspondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the clrournstances siated in the afidavi filed therewith, the High Court riey be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus 'declaring the action of the Respandenis more particularly the action of gn Respondent herein in issuing proceedings vide RoNoSOare006/E2 OF 10.03.2025 (Served upan the Petitioner an 11.03.2025 by which the Respondenis are seeking to resume the land admeesuring an extent of Ac. 12.81 Cents in Sy. No. 92/3 of Yendada Vilage, Vishakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Vishakhapainarn District, more particularly the fand in Pint No.4 admeasuring S85 So.yds as being egal, arbitrary, unjust, without jurisdiction, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, violative of the vone. of the Transfer of Property Act1881, Contrary fo the Order OW18.12. 2017 of this Honble Court nv WP Nos. 36413 of 2074 25053 of 2019, ard violative of Articles 14, 27 and 3004 of the Constitution of India and Consequently, set aside the 'proceedings vide preceedings vide Re. No. 3037/2006/E2, DL10.03.2025 issued by the Respondent No.2 IANO: 1 OF 2025: Petifion under Secfion 181 {PC is fled praying that in the croumstances stated in the affidavil fled in support of the writ pelitian, the High Court may be pleased fo suspend the operation of proceedings vide Re No SOR7/2006/E2, di10.08.2025 issued by 2 Respondent, more paniesteny io an extent of the lane | 1 Plot No.4 admeasuring S85 Sq yds pending disposal of WR. No 8256 ot 20: 25, on the fle of the High Court. $ : ALL RY C qu * bs DETUSINgG § ie Hon u & Re " \ ity oe tone io 7 12 Petiic wehtine a: dee: rs eed ef ocat o \ shwea su YS 7 3) NAL suumenis of Sri K x KS + t x aw WRIT PETITION NO: 8309 OF 2095 Between: z ursel far fhe Resnan oS. we x > : z oy 2 S x 3 aah, A iS Oo Set Ratt i : 2, 8 ~ ; Kallurt indirarrnr ~ Peti§ioner x 3 SRT SUT} " x " ne *. Andhra Pradesh. an Wuppala padu, Prakasam QOistrk "tN ed about g tw AND ~ aS SN Fh PVG 3 lat. No. S02, 4° Fk x ollectar 6 os obec 2 a Ns & Fond : Hy x Mis. Hayagreeva Farms and Os The Tahsidar, Visakhapat BS r x Revenue, Secretariat, Val ng Pariner =e t 2 ame S3004 ing Visakhan " LS . Respondents x i 2 an of india is fled praying th 3 4 3 Be x x me te ot uf on ¥ Set paeN . # of Mandarnus dea A m the nature of ¥ Fee HH be pleased fo isaue an appropriate Writ or order or + tHe circum : Hf = iy ine is $s : z x particular! ss POTS y the actio ring an extent of u Se ey A Man NS shakhapaeinam Rural fie be Vi z without jurisciction, violative of F Principtes of Natural "justice, violative of the provisions of the Transfer of Property Actia81, Contrary to the Order DATS. 2017 of this Honble Court in WLP Nos. 36473 of 2014 AND 26653 of 2018, and violative of Articies 14, 21 and SODA of the Constitution of India and Goisequenly, set aside the srocesdings vide proceedings vide Ro No S037 /200B/E2, DL 16.03.2025 issued by the Respondent No.2: iA NO: 1 OF 2028: Petition under Sectonm 351 CPC is fled praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavii fled in support of the wri petition, the High Gourl miey be pleased fo suspend the operation of proceedings wee Re.No. s0S7/e006/E2, OL 10.03.2025 issued by 2°° Respondent, more narticuiarly fo an extent of the land'in Fiot No.34 admeasuving 1607 Sq yds, pending disposal of WP .No.8309 of 2025, or the file of the High Court, The pettion corning on for hearing, upon perusing the Peftion and the affidavit fled in support thereof and the order of ihe High Court order dated 08.04.2028, 20.12.2025, 27.01.2028 & 17.02.2028 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Kalepu Yashwanth, Advocate for ihe Pethioner and GP for Revenue for the Respondent Nos.] fo 3 and Sn ASC Bose, Standing Counsel for ihe Respandent Nod) WRIT PETITION NO: 8332 OF 2025 Sefween: Korada Rukmini Devi, Wo Late Korada Sankara Rao, Aged about 83 years, Rio H.No.6-64/1, Ralaveedhi, Vemulavalasa, Anandapuram Mandal, Yisakhanainan. . Petitioner AND 4. The Stete of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by iis Pri Secy, Departrnent of Revenue, Secretariat, Velagapud, Amaravali, Guntur District. : The District Collector, of Visakhapainam, Visakhapatnam. a. The Tahsilder, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapainam may st Bay aOR . Raspondents gh C FS orporation, Visi - Fast Faint, East co 2 Pe te §3 or BS oe. RN sy Near "* x > a " oe 8 = s Rw y 2 "3 "~ % Ne Rep by Hs Commi ircuristarice Patiian ur C ro 2 yy the oy 'i 4 4; ro " teers ew eee ' ety a) nr an) re OM; a oro ~ ey oe "pes "7% . eed bee ms on 433 f% oy . isd mn 2 Be 2 &¢ 8 eR BeBe SF yw % we bee nr ee) eae: p "ee ety me w B 3 &@ 8 B ¢ YB yy, Py ne oe 8 & @ rn a a nn ae oe re th WS He we. a a ae Se Oy Pepe 0 nr © nr On " z here & oe * + ores, ahead cs tpn a as re: an rs we {nt ty wen saree " 5 AORs a one bey So 6 2B 2 f 1 LF eG ce a a re = es SS) G6 © £28 FE 8 ee BR Se PB me if bs oe id » © 2 £ 8B Oo m= & oy te OTS oy Pee Bee MM 6 BS me ge me EE g i ay Z a tO ae " , : whe foe 65 5 5 rn tors AC: " " ? re Sane 4 $5: 4 ae] x beet bo . £0 os 5 5 are ay ia ia yet o3 ry OSE eon. res veg oy i oe we eye an, @8 "gt BS "pea , OS 13 Ke 4 rene « "ee oe es) eae 0G lt fs ted 4 we ae ab seca a a a eee Yh wed re 4 ve 3 Cp te yO a ke rm CE Co Ch ey wedee 7 <% Seen Pad oo eo ose we ae nn ed rar 5 @ a nn) bon. - veers % er . pet fegpoe OB 2 Sow 8 B= & ye we Be LS - Oo @€ ¢ 8 € B= GS eo &£ 8 # a m + 6 & _ ¢ C4 8 & D fecocQ SS we B A ee GS os nee ~ pow get Sy we 43 ro 2 . "S05 rene, bone wn et o Sa wyeee. ge , 2 BS Ee Oy Oe SB @ we ds Ew eR oe & ot i ~ 'wis Lh Bo@ % # cm aa =e eee. Bf 8 ee 8 ye E id " i a foods A " share oe © fe Si gp mm Bo Eom oe = £ OS m @ £ pp 2 Pe 2 BG f , 22 @ a ee fo fh, ee no 'gees 3 a ra. wer " us nee, fh sh fe heme LY ~~ = =6TD wef me em OE oe, es . "eh EA ' Pao ee ten i & & S ££ © > in o£ © £ &# BS toys mM Er. aN ' urt may be t iy OO! Gin support thereof! and | g z ® tye Ny x - aly fo an extent of the is ~ . Xf FOF 2028: Ny * st Pat y 2 a Seattion x ae iui : A N 3 FH ar : IANO 08.04.2028, 20 12.2025, 04.2026 & 17.02.2028 made herein and upon nearing the arguments of Sri Nalepu Yashwanth, Acdvonmate for the Petitioner and GP for Revenue for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Si ASO Boss, Standing Counsel for ihe Respondent No.8 WRIT PETITION NO: 8336 OF 2025 Sohween: rm Rdupugant) Naga Dhanamiaya Rao Go E.Gopalam, Aged about 60 years, Rig Flat No.202, Lalitha Manor, Near Tycoon Hotel, Balai Nagar, Visakhepainam . PStioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by iis Pri Secy, Gepartment of Reveriue, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravatl, Guntur District. é. The District Coflectar, of Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Tahsildar, Viss akhapainam Rural Visakh aoainam §. Mis. Mayagreeva Forms and Developers, Door. No.8-20-20/ 4, Flat. No.50s, 4" Floor, Sukshetra - East Point, East Point Colony, Visakhapatinan: S30077, Rep by is Managing Partner &. The Greater Vishakhapainam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapainam, Reo by fs Carmissioner, . Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is fled praying that n the circumstances stated in the afidavil filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased fo issue ar aporopriate Writ or order or direction more partioularly in the nature of Wri of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the action of 2° Respondent herein in issuing proceedings vide ReNo. 3037/2006/E2 Dt 10°63.2025 by which the Respondents are seeking to resurne the jand admeasuring an extent of Ac 12.81 Cents in Sy.Nege/S of Yendada Vilage, Vishakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Vishakhapainam District, mare particularly the land in Plot Nad admeasuring S30 Sea.yds as being Hlegal arb trary, uriust, without jurisdiction, violative of ey Froperty Aci, 1881, Contrary to ihe Order DX TQ AS 2017 of this Hon'ble Court in WOR Nos 36413 of 2074 AND 25685 of S015, and violative of Aniicies YG Si " 4 wroceedings vide proceedings vide Kea No SOS7/2O06/E9, Or 10.03 2095 & issued by ihe Respondent No. IA NG: < OF 2038: Patton under Sectios 197 CPC is fled praying that in the > crcumstances slated in the affidavit fled in suport of the writ netifion, the Nigh Court may be pleased to sus spend the operation of proceedings vide Se particularly fo an extent of the land in Plot No.1 admeasuring 530 Sayds pending disposal of WP No. 8326 af 2085, on the fe af the High Court. The petition coming on for hearing, upon serusing the Peltion and the affidavit fled in support thereof and the order of the High Courf order dated O8.04 2085, £0 72.8085, S701 2026 & 17.02.2026 made herein and uson ae hearing the arguments of Sri Kalepu Yashwanth, Advocate for the Petitioner and GP for Revenue for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri A.S.C Boss, standing Goursel for the Respondent Nod: WIRET PETITION NO: 8387 OF 2025 Between: mS € Vallabhaneni Satyanarayana, Sio Subba Raa, Aged about 7O years, Rfo ofan Ned. 733, Korumantudl, Nidadavolu, West Godavari District, Andhra retionar }. The State of Andhra Fradesh, Rer g Revenue, Secretarial, Velaganudi Amaravall, Guntur District % te The District Collector of Visakhapatnam, Visakhanatinerr:. = Tahsiidar, Visakhapainam Rural Visakhapatnam ope wo ma he ve 4 Mis. Hayagreeva Farms and Developers, Door Na.S-20-20/1, Flat. No.s02, 4° Floor, Sukshetra - East Point, East Point Colony, Visakhanainan SS00t?, 7. Rep by Hs Managing Fariner O34 . The Greater Vishakhapainam Municipal Corporation Vishakhapainam, Rep by its Commissioner. . . &aspondents Pedition under Artidia 226 af the Carstitution of Indie is fled sraying that im the circumstances slated in the affi davit fled therewith, the High Court may he pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of iit of Mandamus declaring ihe action of ihe Respondents more panicularly the action of Respondent herein in issuing proceedings vide Ro No gba7/e00GfES, OF10.08.2025 (Served upan the Petioner an 14.03.2025} by which the Reepodents are secking to resume the jend admeasuring an extent of Ac. 13.91 Cents in Sy. No.g2/3 of Yendada Vilage Vishakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Vishakhapainam District, more particulary the land in Plot No.ay admeasiuring QO Sq.yds as being legal, arbitrary, unjust, without jurisdiction, violative of Pr inciples of Natural Justice, violative of the provisians of the Transfer of Praperfy Aci,188), Contrary to the Order OL18.12. 2017 of this Nonble Court in W.P.Nos.96413 of 2074 and 25852 of 2078, and violative of Ariicies 74, 27 and 3004 of the Consiiution of india and Consequently, sei aside the prnceadings vide proceedings vide Re. No 303 7/2006/E2, TN. 10.05. 2029 | issued by the | sa Reepondent Now: IA NO: 1 OF 2028: Petition under Section 751 CPC is Med praying thal in the circumetances stated in the affidavit Hed in suppart of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased fo suspend fhe operation of procesdings vide Re No SOS7/200R/E2, DL 16.03.2025 issued by 2°° Respondent, more 4 narticuiarly to an extent of the land in Plot Nady adrneasuring 867 Sq yds, 33 pending disposal of WP No. 8327 af 202 5, on the fle of the High Court. The pelition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit fled In support thereof and the order of the High Court order dated t yer bene af See Heo "tan, itn £3 ¢ ray sees ben ai ap Z, ty " Be: & am ep #B 2 ed ae in bd ¢ 5 gen j 'is ay Sere toe mo fo bee ee fo Bek OE me ey oe ae -@ & BB & & ot "3 * the asl ii vs En ot ao 3 aie Ws tin ' i, ie ae a a nS ar on mB eg ee oA 33 Sa fe ES te : ms & ee Zn 4 SoS pg DO -@ & ow Both EF i AL "eet fe oe & © ¢h BB & wot 7 " ' ag we. - Bog 3 Be : % . & 2 eB Rm ee r ' ey wt a abe " ebece Soates gee - v £0 7% ; peo a, yee seat on @ £ ' Gabo zt oe g B& 6 ne 5 # ee we a wre % as fi fae ed i 2 GE BO, DOS ae ad tees, %, us we $ E * dpe. A Tine re 4% We oes od atl oe pion sdbon pene | Be ea Ge me Oo . 6&6 ¢ YF £ & *, mo 8 GB BR of oe © & Oe an ke aie > ee i Fae a - ole * cer re ne t% me vn Mok GC & & - jf ~ Ee Po 8 eB eb RB & & A i if 3 % i B® & @ SOM Bo "ne SO ey id oe ts we, as Sun . ae ry ed $5] © Hy ay Oke Se Om BG we hm ou a a a Pye Ze a so g #8 G&G g. £ SB Me Lh ; ea rect t aed us $e o4 nanen, wed a a} "ran Gee Cae a tn gm Oh a2 fove io ke OR a ed Be me gs pe Be Oo =m eB Gm & Bos 8 $&@ 8 EG © we eR ae ee "2 be Fu ne ee Gs . 6 Bos RS Co, = Be fb 2 #£ s oS Bes op» Be i Be 2 ff B@ 2 2 Pw ZB o5 Bee ee anon an" a we gt, igh we ED ke fy Bo 2 2 ee ee Si Be a ne Bo ~ € *% & ta 2 oh gn tog ges : . ms het Oe sn Od ae OO en - on tie Some ENE : on te Oe ee Fe QB eo BO" Bw Roe <n ores mo 7 re os. ae is on "ae. os. gs me 3 a wh ran wee UG iy feet oie oy LG roeod ~ 3 fer co) #5 pee Caen a a ot rs Sr ae Be gh bn a aes Se me at i ™ we ee wy A re oan an 'we Be OB g G @ £8 © a Loe S ; pia teow we ae ' i oe ; - i be ae Fas Arg mM bd me FB ey 2 & 1 « £ - hf & 8 GB BS | Go - 8 oO es "et eh OR we og TS BG : 4 yee : ; 6 , ; 58 vows Y "~ BS B te C® ge & & g BY & © eT my, Be . Ps w% ahh oe S A ret %4 ~ apne Fs eS Scat he % iss noe Fest oA] eee, ett Cy oo Oe Cy oe > 6G io 3D kp Dm, i GH a £2 6 & ed , Fy foe Say t te en fn time oS ae) Le Seow oa, z cE a my OS Aa A Lp 0% Li, " yon tA ae nm * res , "hoot. wood 4 wn peeed os re ce ned fem, oy ne Yow & Bb wm ws a a fa > GOR Oe im th Ba ke 8 go os om 8B #2 ff Boum & 2B og ao CC te & , Go fy Cg » B aw " "ee BS fom Be fo fe ; Bp me BG oy Da) py a mn a pens OnE CoP 'h3 ron ea a ons o ¢ 2 &§ & & B 2 B "-- @ ~ & % Sb 8 Ff Smo wy A ke 6s Ee WO YE oof Ac. THT} ¥ $ $ & 3 } FADS N : Vishak land ar 3 s ao s belng Heo: g : seeking io mesure the \ a FS s of Principles of Natural Justice, vidlative of the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 7887 Contrary to the Order DL 19.12.2017 of this Hartble Court in WLP Nos 38473 of 2014 AND 25655 of 2015, and violative of Articles 14, 24 and S004 of the Constitution of India and Consequently, set aside the proceedings vide proceedings vide Re.No.SdareOnsres, DLO 2085 issued by the Respondent No.2; IA NO: 1 OF 2025: Paition under Section 751 CPC is filed praying that in the cirsumstances stafed in the affidavit fled in support of the writ petifion, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the operalion of proceedings vide RaNo 30S 7/200G/E2, Dt. 10.09.2025 | issued by 2 Respondent, more partioarly fo an extent of the land in Plot No.38 admeasuring 847.14 Sq yes, pending disposal af WP No. 8338Of 2925, 09 the Tis of the High Court. The petition coming on for hearing, , BRON perusing the Petition and the affidavit Hed in support thereof and the order of the High Court order dated O68.04 2025, 20.72.2025, 27.01.2028 & 17.02.2086 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Kalepu Yashwanth, Advocate for the Petitioner and GP for Revenue for the Respondent Nos.i fo 3 and Sri A.S.C.Rose:. Sanding Gaunsel for the Respondent No.S WRIT PETITION NO: 83557 OF 2025" Behween: Fachava Lakshrmamma, Wo Late S Sri Narasimhulu, Aged about 81 years, Rig O.No.3-1-239, Nagendra Nagar, Seity Guinta Road, Nawabpet, Nellore- 524002 | »Pattioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its PriSecy, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Vel lagapudi, Amaraval, Guntur Dist trict, 2. The District Collector, of Vi sakhapainarn, Visakhapainam. The Tahsidar, Visakhapainars. Rural, Visakhapainam ' 44 " cio Ee 2 8 & eS a a a ; oe LE% bee a7 ra "eet eA y $y on ewes 4 re wees mided pean wn we ge By Lie , "sp yok £3 ood tie Sone 'news te, ko ed a ane ho ge mG me ee a OE OG GS @ & | be ee 5 " on a toe es x 'eee, 5 - 8 @ 8 & a6 & 2 ee & S & B® = 2 2 z fh 2, 7 , the te eae s os tg ger we hed Be yan C3 wm fh Ye SC we me Cy 3 oo cere he eed * ge CF & & ~ & "ty 2 ' 2 a Ay ee CE f " ee . Bh eh Ee moe wy we a ts oan . Ke we rg ££ Y ED me O & B wy me OE pe go & a } 4 an on ny, veh a ee 7%, x Fae a yee" "4 nee thoed 3) ie - eo 8 » = = & Gm i, dbo ome ae re wm Abyed cae fod rood gene we mt Ke oH fon cod 13) ger eed yer a yn ow & & 3s @ BS Bom om @ © ns & BP 2 | io tii x0 5 pd woe yn 5 havee C4 eet et Co gee OEM 3 wn ; i = % be . en a a 8 "3 6 ieee bo . ~ hn + FR RG fe a i 3 fy 0 6 . re gy " Sram wee panes ey ran Li og aves ee oc eee bane? spor Kod ass 3 on i on A Spon % OS pe e "veg iH EG vee BB @ on Sh ed . oy oe oS % BM % 4s cy be 4 8 8 Fae a oe a rs fev pos . Reel pee pn van owen, 7 5 ie; wy 7% rad ger | of 3 eS a we Te ot ei a ied a te bh ges Sk eo eB : £09 on, a be oy, A we ad bon tnt » 8 a tr nero on 2 aH Sees ete " SA Fas Go @ @ a &@ gf & ee 3 $ on oo . © Be %S Gg po ey " B rf i 1 ma a oot A 4 " ed a # * ny wok ih} q wn te Oe; yet iit Oe | fo ere Seow: in S. Ww of re " 14 ees ay rs wae we ae he ot bold ee "a, ay ib oe uh Ee a0 E bere re) some tt ts $ od rast pe " ad oe ae ee fe a8) 3 eg "we oy St Fon toe 7% i 3 Avy me ae Meme R45 a Ee " rae, ees he cook % ge od ' . Ch @ wa Lo ee ge BS we me Ban! A ot wa on. re, / " td 4, its 'as on nay , , 'ty Ay 5 Re fo howe we UG eg a & ana 'oe a ee re oe Lip ae oees on St ao 55 dun Le $F) wy oes, 3 5 fy ne fee tthe rv roo aod tG we £4 lap OS we fy CS Ly ses Sao i he hE, oS , Lhe , "hs rs Se "Le rn oad oe ? £4 yn a GL te ee Be ral fe ey. om & & & C7 "en So oe Z 3 an ? neo ce nies Z i serine fe oe & go eS & oun 2 Ree tee he ie eed ire ° a, ', "fs a me, hen fed rs eee (tay $% go Casa ra) x ca cone [i a 43 Lk yet LO i love 'bene fs, rah sgeee wieed jn & sory on te oh atl 3 i he pees nee te Ch. 23 to . wad et ' gpee mens a # ae te ee fos tt SEF te tt "Gy 2 foe i in ' £3 we £907 on we teder "3 Es) wt vin we y* oy gn re "re G % i th wee ao gh OES Co a fe oon ie oak ae oe . ee oo on ~ o me , he em ce ms Sie a on wg a Se, ees % 2 ke G@ & fa & & os = & a ca eS a me GF & | © fe GB ae BW we Oe no, a ® lace . w+ oe pe ae ce a an oe os ms of ee 2 = ye coe o & 6 S a ae mB So & 0 6 8 © & nn ee e & = ce aud & ne a % @ e ed wnat cd BS ne fie we ba ae on 3 , 'eee % ~ 4 wae ee 3 3 boon ™ ; veda "ap an tere ced Be Moe "ee oy] Hes - eced ry fa me fon £8 x & 3 & ' yee . me a ees toes Od a 6 GQ w & St ra ) eo Sw ao % Be tay BU 2 2 Ee 2 es BES mm B&@ 6 2 & Ew & a= be 2 on ihe soe Sem a res C5 33 an an rey nc Se ee et wae eek wh Bs) oe fem OE ny ed ae he fact ies pe ee 4 tee fen 3 ras Ry ~ es . p sane " 3 Kee, ' "s * - ad Sah wf & & #2 Bw BO & 8 Bo me eS Es ; fn me - TMOG me 62 be seein te od ; i393 eave a Pa oats et fel i % ns re. ot "E> 5 3, Le Lond " r¥3) owe wa nei oo non wa. oy : wg 2 he 4 a a wy | ot ge be wi os & GB @ mr wh ws ee 2 oot @ OO 6 $ B ge ve BE age nin: o> TS ; ew 2 £ & 2B GR @ eteck teers an wie gree a % eo tS 1%) a 5) : anh bb ot ke ke , nn rn eo = et oe Se $3 £2 £S 8 Ze Ee & . x Ne PRO Respondent ¥ weet " ay sf maued by t of the is H x ~, nartcuarly io an exte He. 04 8025, SO128025, S70 4 P2026 & 1702. 2025 made herein and upor hearing the arguments of Sri Ralepu Yashwanth, Advecate for the Petitioner and GP for Revenue for the Resporcent Nos.) fo 3 and Sri ASC Bose, standing Counsel for the Resr sondent No.5: WRIT PETITION NO: 8385 OF 2025 Setween: Potluri Narasimha Rao, S/o Late Sr Krishnamurthy, Aged about 64 years, Rée O.No.28-14-10, Opp Melody Theatre Suryabagh, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-§30020. Feltionar AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Pri.Secy, Department of senna Revenue, Secrelariat, Velagapuci, Ameravall, Guntur District. Yhe District Collector of Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Tahsidar, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam 4. Mis. Hayagreeva Farms and Developers, Door.No.6-20-20/14, Fla No. 502, 4th Floor, Sukshetra - East Paint, East Point Cofony, Visakhapsinam- SS0017. Rep by ts Managing Partner. The Greater Vishakhapatnary Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapainam, a so Rep by ts Comrnissioner mespondents Petition under Anicle 226 of the Constitution of India is fled praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may Ne pleased in issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more panicularly in the nature of Writ of Mandarnus declaring Ihe actlon of the Ressoandents ore particularly the action of 2 Respondent herein in issuing proceedings vide Re No QO37/200G/E2 , BL 16.03.2025 (Served upon the Pellfiener an 44.08.2025) by which the Respontients are se eking to resume the land admegsuring an extent of Ac.12.51 Gents In Sy.No.92/3 of Yendada Village, Vishakhapsinarm Rural Mandal, Vishakhapainam District, more particularly the land in Plot No.9 admeasuring 487 Sq.yds as being Megal, arbiirary, unjust, 3 ; N : x x las of Na ny > a he ui jurisdiction, vinci of the SSIONS < x oy a Seve oe x = ion oF india Orsi Aue BY Consequently, NN x SES 103.2025 2, OETO > ~~ + 7 EN The oy ? Ro No 007/200 ° x TOF 2028 x e IA NO writ Yet : ows t ray we uimetances afated in th ae rer High Court may be pi aia ee Free Z2 as Ee anding disposal of WP.No i The petition com ~% 3 oN 3 = x 3 " 3 idavit A af N x § made herein and x "y a =e Co the Pettioner a N nate fo mh, Acvor r N a 8402 OF 2088 ° x WRIT PETITION NO; . s Rohvren WY Ned N Nive . Patitioner AND < R CR 4, Guniur Distr . ¥elagal $ x vefariat G Roavenus, Se rot Codiectar of Visakhapatin % x sakhanainam *s s 2 ural \ 3 te ¥ NS x dar, Visakha 8 ne y 4. Mis. Hayagreeva Farms and. PEWOOPErS, Door. No 6-S0-209 , Flat. No.0, 4° Floor, Sukshetra - East Visakhapainam-5300 17, Rep by its Managing Partner a ort, East Point Colony, om", The Greater Vishakhapatna am Muni idigal Corporation, Vishakhapainam, Loe) Rep by iis Corimissioner, | . Respondents Paton under Article 225 of the Constitution of India is fled praying {hal in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may be gleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Wirt of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly fhe action of 2°° Respondent herein in issuing proceedings vide Ro.No Sosv/e00G@/E2 , DL1O.02.2028 by which the Respondents are seeking to resume the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.12.51 Cents in ay. No.8e/Q of Yendadea Village. Vishakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Vishakhapainam District, more particularly the land in Blot Ne, 1&8 admeasuring 544.44 Sa.yde as being Hegal, arbitrary, unjust, without jurisdiction, violative of Princi inles of Natural Justies, violative of the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 1881, | Contrary to the Orcer DL 19 12207 7 of ihis Honble Court In WLP Nos. 36419 of 2044 and 28658 of 2015, and violative of Anicies 14. 21 and SOGA of the Constit tution of India and Consequently, set aside ihe proceedings vide proceedings wide Re No SOQ;/2OUMV/E2, OY 10.06.2028 issued by fhe Respondent Now: 4 NO: TOF 2628: Fettion under Section 157 CPC is Med praying that in the a ns croumstances stated in the affidavil [Ned in support of The writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of proceedings vide Re No. 3037/200G/E2, Dt 10.03.2025 fssued by 2° Respondent more 18 narlicularly fo an extent of the jand in Plot No.J8 admeasunng 544.44 Sq. yes, pending dispasal af WP.No.6402 of 2025, 0 on the file of the High Court, The petifian coming an for hearing, upon perusing the Petifion and the affidayil Hed in support thereof and the order of the High Court order dated and ap far Revenue for the Resson ident Nos.t to 3 and Si ASC Base, Standing Counsel for the WRIT PETITION NO: 8406 Between: ~ soa Mohan Ras, S/o Golla Subbarayudy, Aged about 82 years, Rie O.No. t- & e "Py ny ie Pe ae 30, Plot No.4, Kallasoiri Road, Co. operative Layout, Visglakshi Nagar Vishakhapainam, Andhra Pradesh-Sa00 7 . Patitioner AND. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its " Sri Secy, Department of wore Revenue, Secretarial, Velagqaoucl Amearaveat, Guntur District. t wom CF oe The Distnot Collector, of Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam 3. The Tahaiidar, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam S. Ns. Hayagreeva Farms and Developers, Door, Nos SZO2 ON 4 | "et os bt Piat No S02, 4th F Visaknanainan 530017, Rep by is Managing Parine ' aha ye ye Ty we '. reed Ft : or, Sukshelre - mast Poi nt, East Pont Colony y "aa, 2. The Greater Vishakhanatnam i Rep by is Commissioner. . Respondents os Paition under Ariicie 228 of the Constitution of India is fled praying that Fas' in ihe circumstances stated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may ¥ bS Digased fo issue an appranriate WY th ey, 80g oe wa re oo a, Sh. 65, oy ne ot n, an g. ion more particularly in the nature of Wri of Mandamus declaring the action of ihe Respondents more particularly the action of °° Respondent herein in issuing proceedings vide Ro No SO37/200G/E2, DL 10.03. 2028 evwed upon the Pelifoner on - te admeasuring an extent of Ac. 12.51 Cents in Sy. No.92/5 of Yendada \ Village. Vishakhapainam Rural Mandal, Vishakhana atnam District, more particularly the land in Flot No. TY adrneasuring 447 Sqyds as being Hegal, arbitrary, unjust, without lurisdiction, vidlative of Princigies of Nafural Justice, violative of the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 1881, Contrary fo fhe Order OLS 2.077 of this Honble Court in WP Nos.o6473 of 2074 AND 28653 of 2018, and vielative of Articles 14, 3¢-and 300A of the Constitution of India and Gansequenily, set aside the proceedings vide sroceedings vide Ro Ne S037 /200R/E2 DLIG.3.2025 issued by the Respondent No.2: IA NO: 1 OF 2025: Rettion under Section 157 CPC is fled praying that in. the circumstances stated in the affidavit Sled in support of the wrk petition, the High Court may be pleased fo suspend the operation of promeeriings vide Re. No S037/2008/E2, DL 10.03.2025 issued by 2°° Respondent, more 7S particularly to an extent of the land In Plot No.1? admeasuring 447 Sq yds, pending disposal of WP No.§406 of 2028, an the fie of the High Court. The petition coming an for héaring, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit fled In support thereof and the order of the High Court order dated D&.Os 2OS8, 2O72 2085, 27.04 2086 & 17.02.2026 made herein and upon nearing the arqgumenis of Sri Kalepu Yashwanth, Advocate for the Petiioner and SP for Revenue for the Respondent Nos.? to 3 and on AS UC Bose, Standing Counsel for the Respondent Nod WRIT PETITION NO: 8403 OF 2025 Between: Veicha Murall, Sia Veerranu, Aged about 62 years R/a Door No.35-8-4 Mangalavaragyu Peta, Rajahmundry, East Godavari ~ $29 105 / Petitioner AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by fis Pr Secy, Department of weeds Revenue, Secrelariat, Velag yapudl, Amaraval, Guntur District, 2. The District Collestor of Visakhapainam, Visakhapainar tnd . The Tahsildar, Vi isakhapainam Rural, Visakhapainam iS 3 aw ae " os by iis Man % > pyee PD, eds Png, oy F- Oe ee: om fs tert a i. " fe ' we jn, EB a" Bi ae worm ES os % ; on j ; @ ; $3 ver ve Ay Seva " 4 37 "epee rs fer ie been 5, chew be Es bon gee rs hea we wy * 'bed $3 a soe a came ea ee 4 ay TB i An Snr a «gS SO acnaaed id % Bm 2 3 8 @ oe €& @ £ HR & wm » @ - ne ~ ED stot xf nf 3 we ge ? ge ee LE wi 4s) . en dove i % x See, % rg oe ; rer ae 'Govt Roe C4. id wee GE ab : , ics wag Ieee tog isa A % ¢% % Pe rye ae 4 ba eee iret Q th, TS £% wo OS 4 OF we ee Fo we a eo em he Be Be a a ao a er. eh e & 2 & ee Oo Go 8B . BR Eee gs & & D 6 mm te ™ oy Gow & go & & GB & & Ys ste @ i (2 Be Pe ee me oe ye BEM € 4 Bene. 2 see. done cae +4 see Ss Son eed - "nem 4 ieee ae & » SF ms @ 7 ie . & SE SS Ge we i : ae . 3 "ot "A ty 4 sheet wo | pen, seed 6d oy bre ; we ne on oF Pai % f @ (2 £m a Bs - aa * Pn a nr <n a <n) fen gt © s) iy Oe th % te BB & ©, % fe & Be £2e . #& =~ €E Ao OB & " Bhs ; % en Jes ih, . é feng epee # 4 £ ery " ' % aad ee os 4 we Pa Sonne heen <9] ih wore "een be Ce resem i is ~ xed a5 oa ~ & & G&S - © & 8 8 £ Oo mF, 7 feee Lo &t ; 'Se ob er wewts £5 "2 caer ge , GQ , : ' ee Se hj Ee ee ye eb, 4 em C3 "eh, yr Moog bone Cy yaad Seite " aed et a on . a es % 2 hte sod % Sel Ieee ans oh wn tov, rob " «ey 'vee Sor, 4 aes Incl a gly re im nok ge h aah . a 2D re) ft ¢ a taae re] np nA SD se nr a) ood . wh co aS a ae ts od bade og ' - "yen, Braue 4 4 fe, 3 ne ves oy feos i 7 pi Ue a vf we Be He 88 os To wm BG UU er FH & & * ? Te dtere A wets y wee aeoon. et dono. Ks wy % vey Rng yee au 7 ed est rie) & 4 man oon ci "yy | OR Ea oo vos 507 < reboe Seodne faee ' cen Pee %, ond wy vag ve ', , : wet nee, on vf & © a an oa me OG fe ee tt ee wm Lee yr er as ; 3 ot i "ee - a veoe ra dab saan oH Ls vo A a nee gy 4 any w ES og ' "ts ane "OF i A $5 a ia ec ae 4 ated as er ce pe fd % geen. te " gg 3O Ge OS "ee Ld Pc rad oe fot ton "fi Ah ha bn ee " Loe oo 63 a GS x Ree a, odes a vere i es at an "a et a ne oh TB FS ge tae ~ fen oy oo a 0 TE ge ogy Rye Re a} vo (TS we, 2 y . wen. 2 bowed tee 4 od er oa a oe) "ep Eee rae wt i ea i ie BD om Hom tee ES Pee ES tee ay, hy ae , code " OO mw oar nr; rn a5 a a A © <> © a nn go @ a oe ~ Se op eo & Be 6 oe fe "a a a % iia re & x es 5 ome, adatriel NG, " we 4 Cm, wo we «oD a ee Pm ye oh co ; a eB BS ee eg BS 2 Bee Be een eB ge mn. me ane se. & $C Po. 2 gy fed pon soe Jarre 3 on "eek soar "Ot none on, £05 ' Npeeer a faee pea RS "heat ce % g 7 ee: le f CX Th of 2 B 9 & ho ge ge Ea See BOS 3 & @ ££ wo Bm & FR fe Be a eB 4 a oS tt a tam, GE pe a 3 "2 fave ico 0 Ces a a aan') % 0, CT ted Cd 4 nah £2 5 fe of fhe Hig! LRP, aa cS aE > 2) sui a & x ag fot Na. tS and i a ¢ 3 z 3 S 3 artcularly to an extent of the yy Vv The pedilion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit Hed In suomort thereof and the order of the High Court order daied O8.04 2025, 20.72.2025, 270 2026 & 17.02 2026 made herein and upon nearing the arqumenis of Sd Javvall Sarath Chandra, Advocate for the Pefifioner and GP for Revenue for ihe Respondent Nos. fo 3 and Sri ASC. Bose, Standing Counsel for the Raspondent No.4; WIRE PETITION NO: 9104 OF 2028 Setween: medala Narayana Rao, S/o Eedala Veerralu, Aged about 68 years R'o Door no. 2-1a/1, Munisibu Gari Veedhi, Katheru, East Godavari - 533 165. ..Patitioner AND t. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Fri Seoy, Deparirnent of Revenue, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur [isirict. Fag The CHstrict Collector of Visakhapainam, Visakhapatnam. id The Tahsilder, Visakhapainam Rural Visakhapatnam 4. Mis, Hayagreeva Farms and Developers, Rep by iis Managing Partner Door.No.6-20-20/1, Flat.No.502, 4" Floor, Sukehetra - East Point, East Point Colony, Visakhapainam S30017 The Greater Vishakhapainam Municipal Corporation, Rep by iis oF Commissioner, Vishakhay painam, _ mespondeants Petition under Article 228 of the Constitution of india is fled praying that in the circumstances sfated in the atl davit fled therewith, the High Cour nay be pleased fo issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandarnus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the action of 2°° Respandent herein in issuing praceadings vide Ro No Sday/2000/E2, DLTa. 03, 2028 by which the Respen ndenis are seeking fo resume ihe land admeasuring an extent of Ao.t2.57 Cents in sy. Noes of Yendade Village, Vishakhanpeinam Rural Mandal, Vishakhapatnam District, more particularly the land in Plot No.a8 admeasuring 290 Sq.yds as being Wegal, arbirary, uniust, without jurisdiction, violative of inciples of Netural Justice, violative of ihe pravisions of the Transfer of e x Property Act, 1881, Contrary to the Order OL 19.12 2017 of this Hon'ble Court in WLP Nos 36473 of 2074 ancl S888 of 2018, and violative of Arficies 14. 34 and SUOA of the Cansiitution of India and Consequently, set aside the proceedings wide proceedings vide Re No. Q037/200S/ES, DLIG. O38 2038 issued by the Respondent No 2: IANO: 1 OF 2028 Petition under Section S81 CRC is fled praying that in. the rcumstances stated in the affidavit fled In support of the wet pefiion, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of proceedings vide ReNo. s0S7/2006/E2, DL10.08.2025 issued by 2° Respondent, more particularly fo an extent of the land in Piet No 38 admeasuring 580 Sq yes, pending disposal af WP.No. 9104 af 2025. on the fie of the High Court. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petifion and the atidavil fled in support thereof and the order of the High Court order dated GUS.O¢ S085, 20122085, SF OT 2028 & 17.02 2028 made hersin and upon ce hearing the arguments of Sri Kaikala Rama Kireeti, Advocate for ihe Petiioner and GP for Revenue for ihe Respondert Nos.{ fo 3 and SA ASC Boss, Standing Counsel for fhe Respancdent Nog WRIT PETITION NO: S108 OF 2028 Rehween: Pall Narayana Rao, S/o Late Pall Gurumurthy, Aged about &¢ years Rio Door R; mg. 378-62, Satya Nagar, Murali Na dar East, Visakhapatnam ~ 530 OOF . Petitioner 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Pri oecy, Denariment of Revenue, Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravati, Guntur District, po Yhe Distict Collector of Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam. 5 Dee The Tahsidar, Visakhapainam Rural Visakhapainam 4 Mis. Hayagreeva Farms and Crevelopers, Rep by ts Managing Partner, Door. No.8-260-201, Flat No.502, 4° Floor, Sukshetra - East Point Rast Foi Colony, Visakhapatnam. 530017. Ch The Greater Vishakhapainany Municipal Corporation, Rep by its CGammiasioner, Vishakhapainam. | . mespandents Pofition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india is filed oraying thal in the clreurnsiances stated in the affidavit Hed therewith, the High Court may be pleased fo issue an appropriate We it or order or direction mare pariicuiarly in the nature of Wit of Mandamus' declaring the action of the Respondents more particuarly the action of 2°° Respondent herein In issuing proceedings vide Re No SOSF/200G/E2, DL10.08.2025 by which the Respondenis are seeking to resume the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.12.51 Canis in Sy.No8e/a of Yendada Vildge, Vishakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Vishakhapainam District, more particul arly the tand in Plot No 75 admeasuring a8e Sd yds as being egal, arbi rary, unjust, without jurisdiction, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, violative of the orovisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 1884, seen fo tye Order DLIG.T2.2017 of this Honourable Court in WLP Nos. 29415 of 2014 and 36683 of 2015, and violative of Articies J4. 2) and SO0A of the Constitut on of india and C Consequently, sel aside the oroceadings vide oroceedings vide Re. No. SO37/Z00G/E2, DLTO.OS 2025 issued "aby the Respondent Nog: IANO: 1 OF 2028: Patiion under Section 157 CPC is filed praying that in the circurnstances stated in the affidavit fled in support of the writ pelition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of proceacdings wde Ro.No.3037/2008/E2, DL 10.03.2025 issued py 2% Respondent, more ganicularly fo an extent of ihe land in Plot No. 18 admeasuring 395 Sa.yes, pending disposal of WP Noo 05 of 2025, on the fle of the High Court. The pefition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit fled in support thereof and the order of the High Court arder dated 2s a , tere ae eee en rs Hook feos ery, 6] sh ce gees peed' ay 4 ' Gf G ot } ™ ¢86e ¢26 2 2% 2S i cae Sea, ge Ab "yee ee bon " wr ae ; <5 3 Ts reed en wood ~, 5 & oe fe a pot be eo ae) fee 4 Ut 7 bee thea mz S oe ke aS Ap 2 & Bb » £€ & 2 B Ce te ~ ed ie LEE yo ey iy be BG i i ros G aes wo G £ Le my erst coe ae ie a os % Je os > a eed GS oo & a4 os © inn a Bony 1 om * ~ Gy &, (8 6% © %, eo ' 6 eM : a ts -s a em A mB, gt BB oe EG : eo fe OR 'om oe ew OB Bin em GS ye ty a ar fee CH ' BD 3 8 wy £4, tke ve ee hag we Ge ts im o GB EB ee A Bow @ a ie a A ca ws tr ea we gn 3 os. tongs OOF a a San a3 « te tt OS seat : . a be wm OS the % Nepon a ho ; i yt res, tg] "Es ie re Seat £05 Lik : ay heh wet ny 2 on a : e 4 | he ir rz) ve wr, a ab Lf Yew 2 S Q ee Cf me : = Pe BBE, 4 z 5 n 4 o 4 et we z veces " neon Ay. OT saeaeecd a ey Ze o ot a vy £% oe Ue wre ee a tien ke ood aor ge , nn beds pe 3 as oy a a © ee SO Os nn; a <n 7 Pa eB eed 2 os an 9a th a re a an oa wg OY a ar a, nc ans) tea ee ie nn rs) wm Ge my QE gw 8 fs fa rn 2 on en rn. oe ord npes ey faa Fest gone chard heen 3, A 3 Thane Saper i CS iy setae. store ae tS ge Bee fa gy te Z pO cm Be SB mS eA me, Gg @& 8 8 rm "ee a am Go nee 5 & & «" @ BF Be Sf em a3 ioe hy +1 4 i tf eo * Paves ee nr ce Ch ge t ae eng Feed " eo Teo Snug gets ate, gine wm td fy es SOB iy eB : td 5 mS» 2 wi OB a ma ce Bg » 2 ww nae a ne an oan ne: an ans ae woe a a a a a a & B nm G& & @ te Be ne: ne) eee a ar a ar a ns? 7 a a Bos ane tks By ro" my: oh seen pons, £F3 en eatin a2 oo cane ee po en See Le oa ar re eer Z wort Oo Vi, Ted £5 4 oe Snot <-- rs "et % i] if oe seett food 0% tS pear Lf Soto Soop. A Sree Ce Sa em, hE , GA MS Bh yee a 'ee ape gt ~ wih & fe ge C5 5 a oe © > ae Do omy WO Be RM ae ge Th © IS we 4g is ad coe a 5 4 ee ", a eet Aa nr aan ys hen Ee fen ar as " ge Be ee ee S % = Be a roo fen ee on «=~ ; ne i ann 4 oO e i LS " i ; P ; ar £ Be ir ie ge ES poe : " Yoge -- Seg ies pe ee Se oo po ; web Me S eS 'ney " noe ms of : a Z x wnaee s ' * ra, . nee fare io eer i . wre ge oe & a ae ke & Q & ge Bg = Eo» nag a G& mm ue GG a as he aad a me B ao & o % wegee No Fee een Ba can od ans "ey, mG gx # G & 38 a a = OG ge oy ; a a a a hn ss me Og res a © fe ge OG Soo. Par ween yer BA e apeee ? on, - 3 ; oP 597 oe Sc 0 e @ * x Qistnict more part menis o pres) © $ AS being Hes sioner, Vish Yr Pp farly the action G ¥ Hayagreeva Far Door No.8-20-2074 Flatt e, Standing nearing the argu uz WRIT PETITION NO x sen yen fe ae eZ eed Fn i. % a wn wed , , ' ae Noon. os io % Lf 8. ae ss 3 The District Caliector af Visakh: curs 'The Tahsidar, Visakhapair: The Greater Vishakhap Ro.Ne i fs Seethammadhara, Visakhan be Dleased fo issims an ap in the nature of ATH of Vishakhanaina & Pe, "ane : te ~ pd GA SB Sn "3 vn a "sh on aes Bs ae es ch. ae ie ry x et. ; work eee) «ig ae , os , a4 Le, oi a od % 02 2 aan 'yon MH 8 ay Te) me gy OR me ae we i tod 2 Go os a mf > oY mm mh - of Principles of Natural Justics, violative of the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act1887, Contrary to the Order DEQ i 2.2017 of this Honble Court mn WOP Nos.96413 of S014 and 25889 of 2015, and violative of Articles 14, 24 and 300A of the Constitution of mae and vonsequentiy set aside the issued by the Respondent No.2 IANO: TOF 2028: Petition under Section 167 CPC is Ned praying thet in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fied In support of the writ petition, the a Coun may be pleased to suspend the operation of sroceedings vide cNo S03 7/200B/E2. OL10.03.2025 lgsued by 27° Respondent, more sorte to an extent of the land in Plot No.3a admeasuring 1394.64 Sq.yds, pending disposal of WP. No. 8108 of 2025, on the fe of the High The peiiion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the aidavil Hed in suppart thereof and the order of the High Court order dated 06.0¢ 2085, 20.12.2025, 27.01.2026 & 17.02.2026 made harain and upor hearing the arguments of Sr Mandava Abhigna, Advocate for the Petitioner and GP for Revenue for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sr ASC. Base Slanding Gaunsel for fhe Respondent No.8: WRIT PETITION NO: 9110 OF 2025. Sehveen: Kairu Siltamaiakshmi, Wo Late Sn Brahmanandam, Aged about 75 years, Rio Flat No. 303, MK Royale, Nowrell Road, Grand Say Hote!, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam - 820002. 7 Patitioner AND . The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by iis Pri.Secy, Depariment of wee Revenue, Secretariat, Velagapudl Amaravaly, Guriur Destrict. 2. The Districl Collector of Visakhapatnam, Visakhapainam. 3. The Tahsidar, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam Pi. ite Vis. Hayagreava Farms and Qe sone ers, Rep by Hs Managing Partner na Ree Sa fe ae eye TR oer - & 4 . : ~ Door No.8-20-207), Flat No S02, 4" Floor, Sukshetra - East Point, East Faint Oadony, Visakhapatnam SS004?. os The Greater Vishakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Gammmissioner, Vishakhapairam. . Respondents Patton uncer Ariole 266 of the Constitution of india is fled praying that n the circumstances slated in the affidavit Hed therewith, the High Court may be pleased the peltioners pray thal the fi is prayed that this Hon'ive Court in the imerests of justice be pleased fo lasue @f appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly in fhe nature of Wel of Mandamus declaring fie action of the Respondenis more particularly the action of 2 Respondent herein in issuing proceedings vide Reo. No SOS 7/2G08/E2, DLIG_OS8. 2088 by which {he ae ondenis are seeking fo resume the land acmeasuring an extent of Ac. 12.51 Gents in Sy. No. 2/8 of Yendada ViNage, Vishakhapainam Rural Mandal, Vishakhapatnam District more particulary the fand in Pict No. 0 admeasuring 1667 Sqyds as being dlegal, arbirary, unhust, without iurisdiction, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, violative af the orovisinns of the Transfer of Property Act, 1581, Contrary io the Order DTS 12 2017 of this Hen ble Court in WP Nos o6679 of 2074 id and 26653 of P2015, and violative of Arficias 14, 27 and S004 of the Cons stitut ion of india and {a onsequentty. set aside the proceedings vide proceedings vide Ro.No.80s i No ho we 70.03.2025 issued by the Responcden iA NO. 1 OF 2025: Petdian under Section TS? CPC is fied orayin ; 3 a Bee y oe circumstances siaied in the afiidavil Wed in support of The writ oetiion, the High Court may bs " Pleased in suspend the operatian of procesdings vide Re No Sua7 2006/82, DL 1h. 03. 2028 issune by 2 Respondent, more articularly to an extent of the land in Mot No.30 admeasuring [O87 Says, "tS oage ding dispasal af WP No.9210 of 2625.0n the ite of the High Court. The pelifion caming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit fled in support therecf and the order of ihe High Court order dated O8.08. 2025, $0.12 2085, 27.01.2088 & 17.02 2086 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Kalkaia Rama Kireeti, Advocate for the Petitioner and GP jor Revenue for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri AS.C Bose, Standing Counsel for the Respondent No 5; WRIT PETITION NO: 9114 OF 2025 Setwean: Gadde Muniswara Rao, S/o Ramachandra Rao, Aged about 66 years Rio Door no. 1-107, Bilina Vari Veedhi, Yernagudam, East Godavari - 844 315. ... Petiiionar AND 1. The Slate of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Pri Secy, Department of Revers, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravall, Guntur District. &. The District Collector of Visakhapainam, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Tahsiidar, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapainam 4. Mis. Hayagreeva Farms and Developers, Rep by ifs Managing Farner, Door No.6-26-20/1, Flat. Ne. 50e, 4° Fimor, Sukshetra - East Point, East Point Colony, Visakhapatnam 530017, ot The Greater Vishakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Rea by Hs Gammissioner, Vishakhapatnam, | . Respondents Petition under Aricie 225 of the Gonstiution of Inia is Hed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the action of 2° Respondent herein in issuing proceedings vide Re No 20387 /200G/E2, DLIG03. 2025 by which the Respondents are seeking fo resume the land admeasuring an extent of Ac (2.5) Gents in Sy.No92/a of Yendada Vilege, Vishakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Vishakhapainam District, nore particularly the land in Plot No.35 admeasuring 1885 Sa.yds as being Hegal, arbitrary, unjust, whhout jurisdiction, violative of Srinciples of Natural Justice, viclative of the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 1887, Contrary io the Order DLIG 42.2017 of this Honble Cour WP Nos 36413 of S074 and S6083 of 2015, and vidiative of Arficles 14, 34 mroogedings vide proceedings vide Re No 3037/S008/E2, DL1O. gS 2ORS issued by ihe Respondent No.2: IANO: 7 GE 20288: Petition under Section [57 CROC is fled praying that in the circumstances stated in the efidavil fled In support of the writ petition, the gh Court may be pleased fo suspend the operation of proceedings vide om y 2£° Respondent, more - RONo Sook e008ES, DEL 1O.0.2025 issued particularly fo an extent af the land in Plof No.S admeasuring 1885 Sq yds, sending dispasal of WP No.O1 Ti of 2025, on the fle of the High Court, The petiion ing on for hearing, upon perusing the nand th The petiion coring on for hearing, upon the Pet ath % affidavil fied in sugpeart thereat and the order of the High Court order dated 08.04. 2085, 2018 2025, 27.01 2088 & TP 02 2025 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Javvall Sarath Chandra, Advocate for the Pattioner and GP for Revenue for the Respondent Nos.t fo 3 and Sr " 4 AG. Bose, Standing Counsel for hie 2 RSS ponder NaS: RT PETITION NO: S'72. QF 2028 Between: ae miyyanu Subbarayudu, S/o Late fayyanu Ramatah, Aged about years Rfo H.No. @1-e84A0Udds, O U Colony, Shalkmet, Golkanda, Hyderabad - 4600 008. Patiioner {. The Sfate of Ap, Rep. by Ns Fri.Seny, Department of Revenue, Secretarial, Velagapudi, Amaravall, Guntur District, 2. The District Odliector of Visakhanainam, Visakhapainam. "~~ 3. The Tahsidar, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam 4 Mis. Hayagreeva Farms and Developers, Reo by is Managing Partner Door. No.6.20-20/1, Flet.Ne.S02, 4th Floor, Sukshetra - East Point, East Point Colony, Visakhapatinam- 530017, 5. The Greater '_ Vishakhapainam Municipal Corporation, Rep by Hs COMTuasione r, Vishakhapatnam Respondents Petition under Article 2268 of the Constitution of India is fled praying thatin the ciraumistances slated in the affidavit Hed therewith, the High Courl may be pleased to Issue an appropriate Wiit or order or cirection more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the action of 3° Respondent herein in issuing precesdings vide Ro No. soo 7feooges, OL 10.03.2025 by which ihe Responders are seeking (0 resume the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.12.51 Cents in Sy. No.92/3 of Yendada Vilage, Vishakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Vishakhapatnam Dis rot, mors particularly the land In Plot No. 42 admeasuring 60.38 Sa yds as being legal, arbitrary, unjust, without jurisdiction, violative of Principles of Natural ~~. Justice, violative of fhe provisions of the Transfer of Property Act,1894, Contrary to the Order D119.128.2077 of this Hor'ble Court in WP Nos. o6473 of 2014 and 26558 of 2015, and violative of Articles 14, 21 and S004 of the Cansiitution of India and Consequently, set aside the proceedings vide eroceedings vide Re. No. sa3sr/ecos/E2, D110. 00.2025 issued by the Respondent No.2. - iA NO: 1 OF 2028 Pafiion under Section 151 CPC is filed praying thal in the circumstances stated in the affidavif fled In support of the petition, the High Gourl may be gleased to suspend the operation of nroceedings vide Ro No SOS7/S006/E8, Ot 16.03.2025 issued by 2°" Respondent, more particularly to an extent of the land in Pilot Nad admeasunng 800.38 og, yes, Fencing dispusal of WP Side of 2088, on the Me of the High Court, The vetition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and ihe affidavit fled in support thereat and the order of the High Courf order dated OS.0¢. 2025, 40.72 8025, 27.04.2028 & 47. 22028 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sr Kaikala Rama Klreet, Advocate for the Petitioner, GP for Revenue for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Sa ASS. Base, standing Counsel for the Respondent No.5: WRIT PETITION NO: 8448 OF 2628 Bahweoan: Lavudya Rambai, W/o Sri Raniulu, Aged about 55 years, Ria H.No. 7-156 Pandurangapuram, Khammam (Xetrict, Yelangane- SO? 0047 i Petitioner AND. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by fs Pri Secy, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Velagapudl, Amaravall, Guntur [strie gt The Disirict Collector of Visakhapainam, Visakhanafnam. oad The Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam Ws. Hayagreeva Farms and Developers, Door. No.8-20- > 20/1, Flat No.80z, 4" Floor, Sukshetra - East 'aint, East Point Colony, Visakhapainan-S30017, Reg by lis Manading Partner =. The Greater Vishakhapainam Muni fafpal Corporatior 1, Vishakhapatnam, Reo by Hs Cammissioner. . Respondents Petition under Articis 225 of the Constitution of India is filed praying thal y the clrcurssiances stated in the affidavit Ned therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Wil or order or direction more partie sarly fon" ng the action af the Respondents ao iy the nature of Writ of Mancamus declari more particularly the action of 2° Respondent herein in ISSUING Drooseadings vide Re No S0O7/200G/E2, DLITO.O3 2028 by which the Respondents are seeking to resume the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.J2.81 Cents in oy Nagas of Yendada Vilage, \ Vishakhap sainam Rural Mandal, Vishakhagainam District, more particularly the land in Plot No.20 admeasuring 487 Sq.yds as being Hegal, arblirary, unjust, without jurisdiction, violative of Frinciples of Natural Jusiice, violative of fhe provisians of the Transfer of Froperty Act, 1884, Contrary to the Grder DL 12.12.2017 of this Honourable Court in WLP Nos. 36473 of 2044 and 26653 of 2015, and violative af Artic Y4. 37 and S004 of the Constiidion of India and Cansequaentiy, set aside the mrceadings vide proceedings vide Reo No. Soay2o0G/E2, DL OS. 2085 issued by the Respondent No.2: ~ IA NO: 1 OF 2688: Petition under Section 787 CPC is fled praying that in the circumstances stated in the alidiavit fled in support of ihe writ pelitian, ihe High Court may be pleased to suspend the aperation of proceedings vide Re No Soo 2b0agE2. DL. 40.03, 2025 issued by 2° Respondent, more particularly fo an extent of the land in Plot No.g0 admeasuring 467 es nending disposal of WP No.$113 af 2025, on the file of fhe High Cot The peliion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Peliion and i affidavit fled in support thereof and the order of the High Court order dated 06.04 2025, 20.18.2025, 27.04.2026 & 17.08.2086 mace herein and ugon nearing fhe argumenis of Sn Jawali Sarath Chandra, Advacaie far the Petifioner and GP for Revenue for the Respondent Nos i to 3 and Sn ASO. Bose, Standing Counsel for the Respondent t No.5: WRIT PETITION NO: 8414 OF 2028 - Setween: Unralapati Venkata Rarmana Murthy Raju, S/o Upnalapati Rajan Rai, Aged about 69 years Rio Doar No. 2-111 A, Gandhi Nagar, Opposite MDO Office, isakhapainam - SS7055,. - Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Pri Secy, Department of Rovenue, Secretarial, Velagapudl, Amaravatl, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector of Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Tahsildar, Visakhapainam Rural, Visakhapainam z g BPN Respondents Ly Aerewith, the Higi ad * my ap Sina, and Developer 3 be ainam Municinal Corporation, Rap by is a 5 Ny > z "ht ; Me aS sry Cornmssioner, Visi g sisted es in the clroumsiance Se, . réainr Vishakha Pe r 3 we ~ NB, z Pir a " Atif, 'tere, Sper. Reed sone: 4 a Lh, % 4 3% e % ee my f ; 5 ' in ner, vapee. seg ae ee, a os Fal oa ; w i ; <r Sia A rs] 4 wet A r au Sn a ome BF we ed oS & BS , sents 4 i (ty watn ° ye cs $y ane @ pre te OG un KB mor me Eee nS a aes | a an + ar ;; a ae an, o% ad ye gm C3 , eh yh mg GE "h, Ft pos 5 oe a ben "a gen ge £5 "ye GK wi pen a aS A Save. Aon serses be : : an ae Om t's " 033 ng Sewe kn od ns £3 4 a, £ nat we, : sot ood ip ve Be oe ee 2 at Od ee fb. We we ee a, ra te ety Se, a nena Pod ee wet OS 1 607 $e gt ; wget Em) Go ec & 8 F BB & 5 OD a See ge ae $ 4. wh tr oe TF © a Fe va im atone on £ te ~, aap 4 ee . Bo 8G 8 6 &€ ¢ gE CS FS pe eM a aa yy Re BE Ga 8 te be, he GF bret ~ rs A wets ha £F5 " we wet oe] a Co oe "a QD ft GO ~~ 3 Be fet "7% , hd OE OT a capes Lf "on 4 ER ' "¢% af 2 Be Bex So Ez g £ & Bene peony | rs A £0 we teens eat? ' Ong tS Nena : ro xy 3 % Sone om. pn rr Pe hn i oe weer, 3 ry paseo tow os bet bow. Liens oe bb feb %. ra] ths *, my aa eee. Ieee fed "3 a oe vee "e fy Ga nee am g as hed rt es ¢ Gy fo eee Lip A . eon fee . "ee a woes Fs] 'fs Mhoe, ee woe rahe ee pS on ES KG My + " x" Niet or : ame vd ne ~~ Ch et a re -rn <) * e~ ce r ee as a > a, a 7 A Te 5 a CA me coe SY oe eA a se ee 455 4 ae 5 Gs ten £S nn be De pn ac: * Se © Ce ae iy te Re Sean ned 6G tS ae ee aw aes os a 4 as pha, alee oe ora a =, ac a? ns ee Ss A @ = . Ao» @ # Bo poe ee i Bm mm & @ KR amy ££ Be POR B fe ey rae o we OS 8 ee 1G tn es =~ ea wt £4 os . nS? mares go Rg nn ie B wim 6 % OG . @ gl B BB = Ea oor ee "a. pot Bi Sole ays bs 6% (ee = -- Ss EP a £2 wh Bd a 7 "ee: PAS we we 4 "ren + z ed Bw & & & & BO Mm Be gy feos m £ Bw 4B BZ ete Bo Gm mB 3S i o % atten fe, ye ag vspe4, Goad A, wo selene i sea se en in ; mS re: e y 4 bait ae ag o ny we ee gore a nedt SS td Big £ BO we Ee G bo pe f ER og mm ES ag Sot ee ee am a So 2 on the fis order of the High "s x 2 3 "~ x oy > a eek port thereat and ft * z ~ Q iP Sug at tae S necting ihe arguments of Sri "veal Sarath Ghandra, Advocate for the Petitioner anc GP for Revenue for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sx AOL Bose, Standing Counsel for ihe Respondent No.5 WRIT PETITION NO: 9381 OF 2035 Between: Javvadi Gopala Krishna Murthy, sfo Late Sri J Krishna Rao Aged about d4 years, R/o Plot No. 78 Justice Colony, Road No. 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad Petitioner ae 7. The Sate of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Hs PriSecy, Denartment of Revenue, Secretariat, Velaganud Armaravall, Guittur District 2. The District Collector of Visakhapainam, Visakhapainam. Yhe Tahsidar, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhanainam £3 4. Ms. Hayagreeva Farms and Developers,, DoorNo.6-20-20/1, Fiat Na. S02, 4th Floor, Sukshetra ~ East Point, East Point Colony, Visakhapatnam 530077. Rep by ts Managing Partner S. The Greater Vishaki tepainam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhanatnan, Rep by is Cammission Respandents Petition under Ariicie 226 of the Constiition of india praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavil fled therewrh, the High Court may be pleased Io issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Wii of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the action of 2°" Respondent herein in issuing proceedings vide Ro No S087 /2008/E2, DL 10.03.2025 by which the Regpondents are seeking to resume the land admeasuring an extent of Ac. 12.57 Cenis in Sy. No.g2/3 of Yendada Vilage, Vishakhapatnan Rural Mandal, Vishakhapatnam District, more particularly ihe land in Plot No.2 admeasuring 1394.04 Sq yds as being Hiegal, arbitrary, unjust, without jurisdictlon, wialative of Princinles of Natural ae Ube Justices, violative of the provisions of fhe Transfer of Property Act, 188%, Contrary to the Order DITO. 12.2017 of this Honble Court in WOP Nos. 89413 of Gaonsifnution of inde and Co mseguenty, sel aside ihe proceaadings vide nespondent No. iA NO: 1 OF 2028 Petition under Section 147 CRC praying {hat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit {Hed in supsort of the petition, the High Court may b meased fo suspend ihe oneration of proc seedings vide Re No SOS 7/s008vE2, Dt. 10.03.2025 issued by 2° Respondent, more particularly to an extent of the land in Flot No.9 admeasuring 1294.04 Sq.yds, Pending disposal of WR SSei of LO25, on the fie of the High Court, The petition caming on jor hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit Med in support thereof and the-order of the High Court order dated e404. 2028, SQ 72.2025, 27 O01 20868 & TP. 02 2028 made herein ard uson gee hearing the arguments of Mis Mandava Abhigna, Advocate for the Petiiioner and of GP for Revenue for the Respo sdents S Tio S, SA AS. Bose, Standing soursel for Respondent No. WRIT PETITION NO: 13621 OF S028 Sehwveen: Gaddipatl Haribabu, S/o, Late G. Raghavaiah, Aged about 7S years, Ria. Plat No. G53, Road No. 34, Jubsees Hills, Hyderabad - SQ035 . Petitioner 3. The State af AP, Hep. by fs Bris scy, Department of Revenue, Secretarial, Velaganucdi, Amaravat, Guntur District. ot The District Collector of Visakhapatnam, Visakhapainam. ae The Tahsidar, Visakhapainam Rural Visakhapainam 4, Mis. Hayagreava Farms and Deve lopers, Door No.6-20-20/9, Flat. No. 5c, 4" Floor, Sukshetra - East Point, Fast Point Colon Visakhapainam- 530017. Rep by iis Managing Partner car The Greater Vishakhanainam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapsinam, Rep by ts Commissioner, f » Respondents Peition under Article 228 of the Constitution of india is fled praying that in the clrcurnstances stated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more gartioularly in the nature of Writ of Mondamus declaring the action of the Resporients more particularly the action of 2° Respondent herein in issuing proceedings vids Re. No S0G7006/E2, DL1O.O8. 2025 by which the Reapondenis are seeking to resume the land admeasuring an extent of Ac. 12.57 Cents In Sy.No.92/3 of Yendada Vilage, Vishakhepatnarn Rural Mandal, Vishakhapainam District, more particularly the Jand In Piet No. 15 Samneasuring 382 Scqyds as being legal, arbitrary, unjust, without jurisdiction, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, violative of the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 1881, Contrary to the Order DLIQ. 12.201 7of this Hon'ble Court in WLP Nos. 8641350f 2014 and 26653 of 2015, and vidialive of ~ Articles 74, 27 and 3004 of f the Constity ifon of India and Consequently, set aside ihe proseedings vide proceedings vide Ro No SOS 7/200G/E2, O810.03.2025 iasued by the Respondent No.2: iA NO: 7 OF 2628: Petition under Section $51 CPC is Med praying thal in the clrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petiian, the High Gourt may be pleased to suspend the aneration of proceedings vide ReNo037/20060E2. DL 10.03.2025 issued by 2° Respondent, more particularly fo an extent of the land in Plot No.9 acmeasuring 1204.54 So.yds, pending disposal of WP.No. 13621 of 2025, on the fle of the High Court Re 5 3 : NA $ g ia yy $80 ay be plea HION IANO: 2 OF 2028: Hah Court mm z sy & prey se $ . Petitioner x tac OHN yy, 2 2 HS OUP * & a CG . ReSRONS YP " Re ws os me < SI Jseoy, Dep {, hast Point Hi H ey sOrparal g = <s a Sy ifs * inam, Visakhapatnam. x , YOON Serusin <t 8 XN ) favval Sarath Chandra, Adve ; rs iy 3 oN Sey x aN sry A ce r earn an extent of Ac. 3 3 & 3 \ ms x ~ 2 * ie; z anal SOF kA S5unn T4186 OF 2028 Visakhanain: BN x Vaisha ay, 3 2 Y the arqurn S acm ; ° Sf < "~ The peltian g si SYN TRe Sreal x if a REVveEnuS " _ ne upor Ass ; 3 ad By 9 } 3 Ree ee Flat No 802, 4" Finer, Suesheira ~ East The State of Andhra Frack Visakhanainam- S50017. Rep by i ne Tahsi x " Mats Fe CN WRIT PETITION NO Seatweemn Metitioy a " Mention under Article 226 af the Constitution of India is filed oraying that i, it the circumstances stated In the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Wri or order or direction more particularly in ihe nature of Vind of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the action of 2° Respondent herein in issuing proceedings vide Re.NoS037/800@/E2, DL10.08.2025 by which the Respondents are seeking to resume the land admeasuring an extent of Ac i2.$7 Gents in ey Nog oof Yendada Vilage, Vishakhapatnarn Rural Mandal, Visnhakhapainam District, more pariiadarly the land in Plot Ne. 18 dmeasuring 38s Sq.yds as bein g Hegal, arbitrary, unjust, withoul jurisciction, violative of Principles of Natural Justi ice, Wolative of ihe provisions of the Yrarisfer of Fraparty Act 1884, Contrary fo the Order DLIS.T2.2073 Honble Court in WP Nos 36419 of 2014 and 20053 of 2015, and violative Articles 14, 27 and 300A of the Constitution of india and Consequently, sel aside Ine proceedings vide proceeding ngs vide Ro No gO3//2000/r2, om Ot.10.03.2025 issued by the Respondent Noe IA NO: 7 OF 2028: Petition under Section 757 CPC is Wed praying that in the croumstances stated in the affidavit Hed in support of fhe wrt pefition, the Nigh Court may be pleased fo SUSHE end the operation of proceedings vide Re No. 3037 /2008/E2, DL10.03.2025 issued by 2° Respondent, more particularly fo an extent of the land in Flot No.29 admeasiving 1384.64 So.yds, pending disposal of WP. Ne.14186 of 2028, on the file of the High IA NO: 2 OF 2028: Petition under Section PS? CPC is fed praying that in the cireursiances siated in the affidavit Med in suport of ihe wif petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the ssepondents fo permit the Petitioner to continue with the Construction beg undertaken in ihe plof owned by Fetfioner in land admeasuring an extent of Ac.12.87 Cents in Sy. No O28 of Ladd S Yendacda Vilage, Vishakhapatnarn Rural Mandal, Vishakhapainam Cistrict, cae { wood oh. 4 £4 Ste 553 re von fs ay Va irs, " "G ro o, sande ca) 14968 af 2025, on the fle of the High Cour, a wo ie bea) a sb oe. o ma t% oo g. re a3 on for hearing, ucon perusing the Petition and the a ty £ aces rete gore. a ca LY bd es a7 arg 2 B Bos sod iB oH. afidavil Hed in supsert thereof and the orde ~ and upon nearing the arguments of Sri Javvali Sarath o> nancdra, Advecate for = Petitioner and GP for Revenue for ihe RESHS sndent Nos. 7 to 3; WRIT PETITION NO: 18026 OF 2024 | Between: M/s. Hayagreeva Farms and Developer s, A registered Partnershin firm under . ee iq ov 7 <9 the provisions of indian Parinership Act, 193s. Having Hs Office at Doar. gh 220/19, Flat No O02, 4° Floor, Sukshefra - East Paint, East Point Colony, Visakhapainam- S20Q01y, Rep. by the Power of Atiarney' Agent Go Venkateswara Rao, Aged « 44 years, Sfo. G. Janardhana Rao, . Petitioner 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Pri Secy, Depariment of MA 8 UD, Secretariat, Velagapucl, _ Amaravati, Surtur District. 2. The Greater Vishakhapainam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapainam, Rep by hs Camrrissioner. 3. Vishakhagainam Metropoldan Region Development, Authariy Visakhapainam, Rep by Metropolitan Commissioner The Stete of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by fis PriSescy, Deparment of Revenues, Secretarial, Velagapudi, Armaravall, Guntur Oistrict cos) The Disinet Collector of Visakhanainam, Visakhapatnam. 6. The Revenue Divisianal Officer, Shaemuninainan, Visakhanainam ?. The Tahsidar, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam Occ: Business, Rio DINo 2-347, Krishna Pouliries, (ld Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhapainam é &. Mis Mayas reeva Farms and: Developers, Having Hs registerad office al O.No.2-345/7, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhapainam, Sepresenied by is Managing Partner, Ch Jagadeeswarudu, S/o Ch Rama Rao, Aged about 65 years, Occ Business, Rfo 2-349/4, ld airy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhapainam. 1O.Gh. Racha Rani, Wo Ch Jagaceeswardu, Aged about €1 years, Occ Business, Rfo 2-349/9, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhapainam. RR 8 and 10 are impleaded as per 'the Gaouts Order di. 17.02.2025 in LANo OT of 2028. . Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Cansiitution of India is Hed graying that in the circuristances stated In the affidavit fled therewlth, the High Cour may be pleased fo issue an appropriate Writ ar order or direction more particularly im the nature of Wirt of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more parlicularly the action of more parti cularly the action of Respondent Noa.s herein in issuing proceedings vide BA NO O86/3980/B/Z1/YDA2021 fe office 299800) dated 08.07.2024 (Served upon the Petitioner on 11.07.2024) by which the Building permission granted to the Petifloner is kept in abeyance and further directing the Petitioner to stop the work and not io proceed with any further construction activity as being iegal, arhulrary, unjusi, without jurisdiction, violative of Princioles of Natural Justice, violative of ihe provisions af the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Carporafion Act, 1956, Coartrary fo the Order DX 14.05. 2022 of this Hon'ble Court in WP .No.8384 of 2082, and violative of Articles 14. 2] and SQ0A of ihe Constitution of India and Canseguenily, set aside the proceedings vide BLA No TO86/SoQ0/RV21 A DAZU21 (e-office- 298800) dated 08.07 2024 (Served upon the Petitioner on VLO? 2024) issued by the Respondent Nog: iA NO. 1 OF 2024: - Pettion under Section 184 of OPC is fled praying that inthe circumsiances Stated in the afidayit fied In support of the writ petition, the (served upon fhe Petifiener on 14.07.2024) issued by Respondent Nog, mending disposal of WR Ne. 1SO28 of S024, on the fie of the High Court. iA NO: 2 OF 2024: Petition under Section 157 of OPC is filed praying that Inthe crcumstances stated in the affidavit fled In support of the writ pefition, the High Gourt may be pieased to Direct the Respondents not to interfere with x canstruction activily being undertaken by the Pelitioner in schedule property FA admeasuring an extent of Ac.?2.57 cents.in Sy.No.82/9 of Endada Vilage, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam Distinct pending disposal of WP. No, 15028 of £024, on the fe of Ihe High Court. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Pelition and the affidavit fled In support therea! and the order af ihe High Court order dated 26.07 2024, OF 08.2024, U8.O8.S026, Zl. OE L048, W208 LOR4, S110 2084, Wp As, 2B S04, 12.1 S0e4, 03.01.2028, 08.01.2085, 24.01 2088, 05.02 2025, IS.02. 2025, 19.2. 02', OS 205, QB.08.2025, 2012. 2088 Alay Kurnar Kanaparthi, Advocate far the Petitioner and Sh "tA a " cas 8 "ea Be Ne the Respondent Not and Sri itn ra) aah wp Administration & Urban Development AS. Bose, Standing Counsel for the' Re espondent No? and Sx Somisetly - ne, a % wb ay sz? 7 oo ae} Shee gb wok peer ee. et ta 3 na bodes oS "2 3g Ganesh Babu, S Slanding Counsel Revenue for the Respondent Nos.4 fo WRIT PETITION NO: 16882 OF 2024: Sehween: Javyvadi Gopala Krishne Murby, S/o Late Sr J Krishna Ran, Aged about 88 years R/a Plot No. 78, Justice Colony, R Road No. 10, Saniara Hills, Hycerabac- Feiitioner fn *. The State of ALP,, Rep. hy is Pr. Secy.Department of MAS UD, Secretarial Velagapucl, Amaravali, Guriur istrict. pa The Greater Visakhapainam "Manic cipal Corporation, Vishakhapainam, Rep by is Commissioner. 28 _Wes.Hayagreeva Farms and QDevelopers, Door No.G-20-20/1, FlalNe.502, 4° Floor, Sukshetra East Point, East Paint Colony, Visakhapainam- 580017, Rep by its Managing Partner : 4 Gh. Jagadeeswarudu, S/o Rama Rao, Aged about O4 years, Oex. Business. Rio D.No.2-34a/1, Krishna Poultries, (id Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhanainam. Respondents Petition under Ariicie 226 of the Consitution of india is Tied praying that in the clraumstances stated in the affidavil fled therewith, the High Court may be pleased fo issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more carlicularty in the nature of VWWrit of Mandamus" declaring the action of the Respand Janis more particularly the action of Respo oniient No.2? herein i issuing prace eedings vide BA No 1 08G/3860/8/21) yDAI2021 {e-office- 299800) dated 06.07 2024 keeping the Building permission granted to the Respondent No.3 in abeyance and further directing the Respondent No.3 to stop the work and not {fo proceed with any further construction activiiy salaly because of the civi disputes sending belween the Respondent Nos.3& 4 as being Hegal, arbitrary, unjust violative of Princinles of Natural Justice, violaive of the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and violative of Articles 44, 21 and S004 of the Constitutien of India and Consequently set aside the proceedings vide B.A.No, 1088/3980/ Bie VYDA S081 (a-ofice 289800) dated O6.07 2024 issued by the Respo ondent No.2. IA NO: OF 2036: Petition under Section 151 of CPC is fled praying That in ihe orcumsianoes sisted in the affidavit Aled in supe art of the petition, the High Court may be pleased) to suspend the operation of proceedings vide BLA No TOSE/S960/ 8/2 1/Y DA20?2 ie-office 299800) dated 08.07.2024 issue ed by Respondent No.2, Pending disposal of WP 16982 of 2024. on the fle of the The petition coming on for hearing, upon alidavil Hed in support thereof and the neeeeee . 12. es O2.07 2085, ee 2U88, 2401205, 05.08.2028, cored 17.02 2028 made herein and upon n heari ing the arguments of SRE KALESL "ASHVVANTH, Acivocate for fhe Petiic ner and of GP MUNCHIPAL AOMN AND URBAN DEV AP for the Respondent Now and of SRE CHLEEP KUMAR. Advocate for the Respondent No.2 and of SRI SRINIVAS RAG BODDULURL Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 3 & 4. WRIT PETITION NO: 17008 OF 2024 Between: Mullapudi Anasuya, Wo Mullasudi Venkata Rao, Aged about 78 years Po H No 220, 1% Ward, Near Cinema Hall Canter, Jan waredayg udem Mandal, Laksayaram, West Gocdavar- 584484. Mae Patiiiansr AND y. The Siete of AP Rep. by is Pri Secy Department of MAS UD, Secretariat Velagapudl Amaravall, int ur District. 2. The Grealer Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapatinam, Rep by tts Carnmissianer. 3. Wis Hayagreeva Farmea and Developers, DoorNo.6-20-30/1, Flat No.sd2, 4° Flor, Sukshetta East Point, East Paint Colony, Visakhapainan- 830017. Rep by its Man aging Partner 4. Gh. Jagadeeswaruci, sfo Rama Rao, Aged about 84 years, Orc. Busiress. Rio D.No 2-887), Krish na Paulties, Old Dairy Farm, Aclarah Nagar, Visakhapatnam, | Raspondents Liew Petition uncer Ariicie 226 of the Constitution of India is fled praying thal in the circumstances siated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may be pleased fo issue an apgrogriate ¥ W Aint or order or cireciion more particularly in the nature of "Wint of Mandamus' declaring the action of the Respondents i more particularly the action of Respondent No.2 herein in issuing proceeding vide BLA No 1OS6/A960BIZ1/YDAIZOR4 fe-afice-289800) dated 06.07 2024 keeping the Sullding permission dranted to the Respondent No.d in abeyance and further directing the Respondent No.3 fo stop the work and not to proceed with any further construction activity solely because of the civil disputes pending between the Respondent Nos.3& 4 as being egal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, violative of the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Cdrpdration Act, 1955 and violative of Arficies i 14, 27 and S004 of the Constitution of India and Corsesquently set aside the proceedings vide BA No TO8G/S9S/B/2 TY DAIZ021 (e-offies-S99800) daicd O6.07 2024 issued by the Respandent No.2 IA NG: 1 OF 2024: Petition under Sectian JST of CPC is filed praying that in the crcumstances stated in the affidavil fled in support of the pelition, the High Court may be pleased to susoend the operation of proceedings vide C.A.No 1O8G/3800/EV2 1/YDAIRO02 T(e-office-299800) dated 06.07 2024 issued by Respandent No.2, Pending disposal OPWP T7006 of 2024, an the le af the High Court. oo. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Pefition and the afidavi fled in support thereof and the order of the e Caurt dated 28.17.2024, 12.12. 2084, OB. 2025, O89. 2088, 24.01.2025, 06.02.2025, 06.2025, 19.02 2065, 18.03.2025, 09.05.2025, S012. 8025, 27. OF 2028 & 17.02.2026 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Kalene Yashwanth, Advocate for the Petitioner and of GP for Muncipal Admin and Urban Dev AP for the Respondent No. and of Sri J Dees Kumar, Advocais for the Respondent No.2 arr of Sri Srinivas Rao Sodduluri, Advocate for the Respondent Nog.3 & 4. ia fon o os WRIT PETITION NO: 17009 OF 2024 Behveen: xs rae eye crepesy SE PRen oe arenes Soesesed wehoeve dt sya res se ~ Ata TPA Auchioud Satyanarayana, Sio Ramarao, Aged about 82 years Ryo 0 No SAY, Tanuku Mandalam, Maddasuram, West Godavar-534140. Petitioner AND 1. The State af AP. Rep. by Hs Prisecy. Department of MAS UO. 2. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Gorporalion, Vishakhapatnam, Rep by is Camrmissioner. 3. Mis.Hayagreeva Farms and - Developers, Door No8-20-20/5 | FlatNo.508, <"Floor, Sukstetra. East Por, East Pomt Colony, wp Visakhapainam- 530017. Rep by its Managing Pariner 4, Ch. Jagadeeswarudu, Sfo Rama.Rao, Aged about 54 years, Occ. + + Business, Rio O No S-S4dQ)4. krishna Pouliries, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh * Respondenis Pa Fetition under Aciole 226 of the Cons stiiution of India is fled praying that in the circumstances slated in the alfidav! i Hed therewith, the High Court may be gleased fo issue an appropriate Writ ar order or direction more particularly in the nature of Wet of Marelarnus' declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the action of Respondent No.2 herein in issuing proceedings vide BA No. 1086/0900/B/2 TYDARO27 {e-ollice-<99800) dated 06.07 2024 keeping ihe Building permission granted io the Respondent Noo in abeyance and further directing the Respondent No.3 fo stag ihe work and mol to procead with any further construction activiy solely because of the civil disputes sending between the Resmandent Nos. 3& 4 a9 being egal, arbitrary, unjust, Wolative of Principles of Natural stig, veoiaie of the Provisions of the me a Greater Hyderabad Municipal fo gw 44, 2) anc SOOA of the Constitution af inal & and Consequently sel asia the proceedings vide 8 _A.No. TOS86/3980 IBIZANDAI2 2021 (e-office-Zuuead) dated OG.07 2024 issued by the Respondent No.2. IA NO: 1 OF 20284: Pefiian under Sectian 157 of OPC is Med praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the peltion, the High Cour may be pleased fo suspend the operation of proceedings vide GA No 1 O8G/S850/B/2 TY DAR OST (e-office- 299800) dated 06.07 2024 issued by Respondent No.2, Pending disposal af WP 17009 of 2024, on the Me of the High Court. The peition coming an for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the alidavil Hed in support thereat and the order of fhe High Court dated 26.99.2028, 12.72.2024, O23.07. 2025, 09.07.2085, 24.01. 20258, O6.08 2028. 13.02.2025, 19.09.2025, 18.03.2025, 09.05.2025, 20.12.2025, 27.07.2028 & 77.02.2026 made herein and upon: "hearl ng the arguments of SRP KRALEPRGO YASHWANTH, Advocate for the Petitioner and of GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP for the Respondent No.i and of SRI J DILEER KUMAR: Advocate for the Respondent No.2 and of SRI SRINIVAS RAG BODDULURI, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4. WRIT PETUION NG: T7071 OF 2024 Sehween: Lavudya Rarmmbai, W/o Sri Ramulu, Aged about S7 years Rio H No 7156, Pandurangapuram, Khammarm-5070017. ; _ Petitioner "AND 1. The State of AP. Ren by ité PriSecy Department of MAR UD: Secretarial Velagapud, Amaravati, Guntur District | 2. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapainam Rep by Hs Cormmfssioner. 3. Mia Hayagreevya Farms ane Developers, DoorNo.8-90-20/4, YY, Spa oy Visakhapatnam S20017. Rep by ifs Managing Pariner ~y 4. 0h. Jagadeeswarudyu, Sfo Rama Rac, Aged about 84 years. Osc. Business. Rio DO No. 2340/1, Rrishas © oe 'oulines, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhapatnam. . Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Const lution of Incla is filed oraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may be pleased fo issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particular! hen, in the nature of 'Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the Respoi frmore particularly the action af Respondent No.2 herein in issuing proc vide BLA No. TO86/S960/ER/2 1 YDA202 1 (e-office- 299800) dated O8.07 2apd Keen! ng the Building permission granted tothe Respondent No.3 in abeyance "yy and further direc ing the Respondent No 3 to-step the work and not fo proceed re ro PN with any further consiruction activity ad because of ihe civil disputes sending between the Respandent Nos.a&.4 vidiative of Principles of Natural Justice, Wiolafive of the orovisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municinal Corporation Act, 1955 and violative of Articles T4, 27 and 2004 of the Constitution of India and Cansequently set aside the * proceedings vide BLA No TheGS9e0/R/e VYDAZ021 (e-offles-299800) dated IANO: 1 OF 2024: Petition under Section 757 of CPC jis fled graying that in the uy croumstances stated in the affidavit fled in suppert of the petition, the High Court imey be leased fo suspend ihe operation of proceedings vide B.A V.No. OSG /S980/ES TY DAZ 08 Tis-ofice- 288800) dated G7 2024 issued by Respondent Nog, Pending disposal of WPF 17017 of 2024, on the file of the The petition coming on fer hearing, upon perusing the Pelion anc ihe affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated 28.11.2024, 12. 12.2024, 03.01.2025, 09.07.2025, 24.01 2025, 06.02.2025, 13.02.2028, 19.02.2025, 18.05.2025, 00.05.2025, 20.12.2025, 27.01 20268 & 17.02.2026 made herein and upon hearing Ihe arguments of SKI KAL mPU YASHWANTH, Advocate for the Petitioner and of GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP for the Respondent Nod and of SRI] UDILEEP KUMAR, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 and of SRI SRINIVAS BAO BODDULURI, Advocate for {he Respondent Nos.3 & 4 £3 2 WRIT PETITION NO: 17023 QF 2024. Sehveen: Ainemoudi Nageswara Rao, Sfo Ayyanna, Aged about 68. years, Rio.H.No. 71409, Royavaripaiem, Enamadais, Guniis-522019. . Petitioner AND . The State of APL Rep. by iis Pri Secy Department of MA& UD, Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravatl, Guntur District. 2. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapainam: Rep by ifs Commissioner. 3. Mis.Hayagreeva Farms and Oevelopers, Door. No.8-20-20/9 Flat.No.502, 4°'Floor, Sdkshetra East Point, East Paint Colony, Visakhapainanr 530017, Rep by fis Managing Pariner 4. Gh. Jagadeeswarudu, S/o Rama Rao, Aged about G4 years, Occ. Business. Rio D.No.2-349/4, Krishna Poultries, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhapatnam. | . Respondents Patition under Article 226 of Ihe Constitution of Incia is fled praying That in the circumstances stated in the anidawit Mead therewith, the High Court may be deased to issue an appropriate Writ or order aor direction more garlicularly iy the nature of Wieit of Mandamus' "dec! aring the action of the Respondents L-type 1% ; " 64 4 "yn oe ' "4 y " wegen xy "yy ge as bee a] eee "eee ask post hee? Seeeel "pee ot oe idee dent sy OE Gg gy ar aoe mm 5 " ° "tn, Dy a feet ges ow % oy Ks 5 on tie oe ME x ak, yon <nees $i nee 1% nee ty ee SE on a oh. io ol SA a 3 GP gate 'poh % é 1 , £4 " pot Whe 4 "i Lge Ch tea fag Be. os g J wry, ES pay A Lb te ones roy we oe, with "a ee sees a Son sor ey "4 Sires z nn E%s "Gis bad im ae weet pao Wil or bx % oy oo we wooee con fewe 42% t4 fs ee seed Go " ae, ined fone 3 oe em ry 48 "e. 2 raced , ras) orere peer it old Sede yon 'gg, 3 ie 7 nn vel te " we 3 ae #4 As oo is £e tee ve ane a a ry a wy thee oe Md Sind "Aieed mF De oO fom & @ oa bs "FW me % ee eG Bw &@ BB F nn me Ae, Saaaadl 4 ae eee Cm & SB aw Hoe 3 BB . Bx & e aad pad eS ht rey oo ae Hi "aa eee ge CS af Gy SN S, ny oe toe ug ci3 o CA oe wR fh Be po SR ee jn ace ott we po As ey "3 Be 5 "x os 3 ae 4 ree Ss 4 ; de Bg Bt ao we te Re oS oA a ares ee haat ~ he 's " vg gy Te cH 2 News i a oh fs wad a , *«: foce Ks Oo G&G F @ 4 8 BG G ™ a , & & B GB ong ' "Seen ck 4 f a re a <) Ott EE gap A See BRR agen a a Oe an nae a ~ fee pan : a nn ns CS GG EG tame gy deg 55] $ "yon : rs 2] Ets n%- res if, tad Neal e . vet v4 ahh pod Be 2 Ee p> Bb 8 BB GH my SB & i a a A oe ; a acc ae bet Seve hh 3 ine & ¢ ®@ 22 5 8 € EB & ow % B BG Qt oft , $ ' hand bee of a wage a . bess $0 & 8 Oe =~ 8 BE EB Oo 8 ge Be --- 4 'as Se LE % a p " gros te, "fz "e '4, . " - rae w oe gS, wa ALY teee ae vee i. ee oe Dy Gn &@ &@ HR & Be B 8 BS & a © "ae fe yer ey oe $4 teed %, ee mm £% neren Pos separ @ oot ", eeee Moped feee (Gy ne Li, £% ete "nk Zz 7 a na co 4 res 6 oo i 2 gb 'Se OE 3S & A - GS B ey Oo @ DB @ ore Sy he SS / a a : GS 8 & 2 BO 1 & gy By Be E &, a fb pn TB BN em a ann aioe " Bo. om © Oo R fen &% m o So G&G a Eh td ud 2 eke ee wg 05 a 2 & & 8S 2 oo oH i. aAS wore, Lbeeet , per ;% Wk 4 'aed aa a5 too ) 'he ite BD £ Be & FE Bo t B ob eH 4g Go LZ are a 2 8 £ £ EP oe £ o Boa Se & 6 @ 2 2 Fe @€ Be * B a nn rn 4 as 3 3 & mF unt & & Bo # a 2 o a On ee a a oe tm OY @ po woe ay "4 Ch oy "oo 'eet f CH ae . s nel a fen cL ew to Oh UDF tb es i ce rn ae so As aeeee Passel oad . * Ls * nny nm "rs 5 "ons : i te & to 5a we vee Cm : Ly OS ; x Bi BG @ £ & 2 @ 2 he a a ann. AS: ' ae EER RUMAR, AO BODDULURIE, NE % 3 x g os prey Dey sari fhe arqurments of SRI KALEPU uy SRINIVAS F ed N y yoann A Nos 3 & a fe Rasnonden > % r 3 , W218 2024, O01 2OSS8, Advocate for i 228 made herein 2 Pee ey Advocate far the Respandant YASRVVANTH, Acivo ae WRIT PETITION NO: 17194 OF 2028 Bafwean: Sm. Mullgpuci Anasuya, Vio. Mullapucll Venkata Rao, Aged about &0 years, Rio. Door No. 2-20 1° Ward, Near Cinemahall Carer, Jangarsddygudem Mandalam, Lakkavaram, West Godavari Distric Andhva Pradeshe-5a4451. . Petitioner AND i. The State of ALP. Rap. by its 5 Pil Secy, Department of Ravenue Secretariat, Velagapudi, Armaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Distict Collector of Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam. 4. The Taheidar, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam 4. M/s. Nayagreeve Farms and Developers, Door No 8-20-2071, FlatNo.S02, 4th Floor, Sukshetra - East Point, East Point Colony, Visakhapatnam 530077. Rep by iis Managing Pariner os The Greater Vishakhapainam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapainam by its Cormmissioner. Respondents Petition under Articie 228 of the ¢ vonsiffution of India praying that a the circumstances slaied in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may be pleased fo issue an appropriate Writ or arder or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandarnus declaring the action of the Respondents mors particularly the action of 3° Respor ndent herein in issuing proceedings vide Ro No QOS 7/200G/ES, DE TO.08, 2025 by which the Respondents are seeking fo resume the land admeasuring an extent of Ac. 12.51 Cents in Sy.No.92/3 of Yendada Vilage, Vishakhapainam Rural Mahcdal, Visakhapatharh ONelrict particuiarly the land in Plot No. 23 admeasuring 262 Sq.yds as being iHegal, arbitrary, unjust, without jurisdiction, vio alive of Frincipnies of Natural Justice: violative of the provisions of the Transfer of Properly Act, 1881, Contrary to the Order DE 79.12.2077 of this Honble Court in W_PNos.38413 of 2014 & 28858 NW 2OTS, and violative of Ariicles 14, 21 and 3004 of the Cansiiution of India Consequenly, set aside ihe more and proceedings vide groceacings vide Ro No S007 /200G/Es, IN. 10.03.2085 issued by the Resnandent No.2. iA NOL TOF 2028 Feiiion under Section 157 OPO righ Coun May be " Please fo Suspend the operation of proceedings vide particularly fo an extent of ihe land in Plot No.?S acbrieasuring 385 Sq yes, Pendir ng disposal of WP 17194 of 2085, on the le af the High Court. iA NOs Ss OF 2028 Petiion under Section 15 een hte CPO is filed praying that in the cireumstances steted in the grounds fled in summert of the pelifian, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respa ondents to permit fhe Petitioner fo cortinue with fhe Construction Being underlaken in fhe plot owned by Petlioner in land acdmeasuring an exient of Ac. 12.51 Cents in Sy.No.92/8 of Yerdada Vil lage, Vishakhapatnam Rural. Mandal, Vishakhapainam District, 38 3 . ig Saad The petiion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Fettion and the 44.07.2025, 20.12 2085, 27 OF 2026 & 17022 O26 made herein and upon hearing the » arguments of Sri Javvali Saraih Chandra, Advosate for the Petitioner, GP for Revenue for the Re BSP! ndent'Nos.i te 3. Sn AS Bose, Standing Counsel for the Respondent Noo, WRIT PETITION NGO: 19744 OF 2024 Seiween: Vallabhanen| Satyanarayana, so Subba Rao, Aged abaui S8 years, Ria Door No $133. Korumamidi, Nidadavolu, West Godavar- 534308. Petitioner AND 1. The State of AP. Rep. by iis Pri Secy. Department of MA& UD, secratarial Velagasudl, Amaravatl "Gun tur [istrict 4. The Greater Visakhapatinarn Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapainam, Rep by ds Commissioner. 3. Mis. Hayagreeva Farms and Developers, Door.No.g-20-20/1; Flat No.502, 4" Floor, Sukshetra East Paint, East Point Colony, Visakhapainan>y SS0017 Rep by ts Managing Partner. (ch. dagadeeswarudu, Sfo Rama Rao, Aged about 64 years, Occ. Business. R/o D.No.2-349/1, Krishna Poultries, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhapatnam. Respondents Petition under Ariicile 226 of {he Coansitution of India is fled praying that nthe circurisiances stated In the affidavit fled therewith, the High Gourl ma be pleased fo issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more sorticulery in the neture af Wri of Mandarnus' declaring the action of the Ressandents more pariicularly the action of Respondent No.3 herein in issuing proceedings vide B A No 1O88/S98Q/B/Z TY DA2021 (e-olfice-299800) dated 06.07 2024 keeping the Building permission granted fo the Respondent No in abeyance and further directing the Respondent Nod to stop the work and nol fo proceed with any further construction actvily solely because of the civil disputes pending between ihe Respondent No.3 and Re csponderl No.4 as being Hegal, arbitrary, urgust, viclative of Frincioles of Natural Justice, violative of the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municinal Corporation Act, 1955 and viglative of Articles 14, 27 and 300A of the Constiution af india and Gonsequently wet aside ihe proceadings vide BLA.No. JO8G/SSB0D/EYS YY DAZOS I {g-nffice- 299800) dated 06.07 2024 issued by the Respondent No.2. iA NO: 1 OF 2024: Petition under Section 157 of CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the neiiion, the High Court may be pleased fo suspend the operation a proceedings vide BLA.No 1OS8/2860/RF 1/Y DARE tle. office: -€OO800) dated O8.07 2024 issued by Respondent No.2, Pending disposal af WP 19744 of 2024. on the Ms of the The peliion coming on for nearing, upon perusing the Petition and the afidavit fled in support thereof and ihe earlier Order of the High Court Ges 12024, T2712 2024, 08.01 2038, GAOL SSS. 24.08 eee O8.02.2025, 17.02.2028 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRE KALEPU YAGHWANTH, Advocate for the Petitioner and of GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP for the Respondent No.i and of SRI J DILEEP KUMAR. sianding Counsel for the Respondent No.s. WRIT PETITHON NO: Ta748 OF 20284 Sehwern: Pilea Narasingaras, S/o Pile Bangarayya, Aged about 88 years Rio Door No. . $20, PM Palem, Chandramgaiem, Pothinarnallayapalem, Visakhapatnam 530041. Patihioner Rep. by ts PriSecy. Deparimant of MAS U wrth A. Secretanatl Velagapudl, Amaravati, Guntur District. "O 1. The State of 2. The Greater Visakhapainam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapainam, Rep by is Commissioner, fad Wis. Hayagreevya Farms and | Developers, Door.No.8-20-20)4, Flat NeSo2, 4Flnoor, Sukshetra East Point, East Paint Co sony, Visakhapairam- 530077. Rep by its Managing Partner 4. Ch. Jagadeeswarudu, Sioa Rama Rao, Aged about 84 years, Occ. Business. Rio D.Na.2-3494, Krishna Poultries, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhnapainam. Respondents Petition under Article 228 of the Canstiution of India is fied praying nat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may be pleased! to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly i the nature of 'Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of he Respondents more particularly the action of imei No.2 herein in issuing proceedings vide B A No TOSG/S95Q/EV2 VYDA/S024 fe-office- 299800) dated 08.07 4024 keeping the Buliding permission granted ia the Respondent No.3 in abeyance and further directing the Respondent No.3 to stop the work and not io proceed with any further construction activity saiely because of the civil disnutes pending between the Respondent No.3 and Respondent No.4 as being Heal, arbitrary, uniusl, violative of Principies of Natural Justice, violative of the mpravisions af the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1999 and wiolative of Articles d4, 21 and SQ0A ef the Consttution of India and Gonsaquently act aside the proceedings vide B.A.No. 1086/3060/B/2 1/YDA2021 (-offics-299800) dated 06.07.2024 issuad hy the Respondent No.2. iA NO: 1 OF 2084: Petition under Section (St of CPC ie filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the _ operation of groceadings vide BA No, TOSS/S960/B/2 VY DARG2 lle-office 299800) dated 00.07 2044 issued by Respondent No.3, Pending dignogal af WP 19745 of 2024, on the Me of the High Court, | The petition saming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit fied In sumport thereof and the order of the High Court datec 28.77.2024, 12.12 2024, 68.01 28 09.07.2025, 24.07.2088, 06.02.2085, 3.02. 2025, 19.02.2025, 18 03.2025, 09.05. 2025, 80.12.2025, 27.07.2025 & {702.2028 trade herein and upon hearing the argurnenis of Ms. Raley Yashwanth; Advocate for the Pelitioner and of GF MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP for the Respondent No.1 and of SRI UDILEEP KUMAR, A FR rn os Advocate fur the Respondent Nas.3 & 4. RUT PETITION NO: 18746 OF 2og4 Sehyvean: Abbina Hanumantha Rao, Sfo Abbina Subba Rao, Aged about 64 years Rio Door No.245, Near Water Tank, Sangayagudem, Oevaranalli Mandal West Godlavari-534313. Petitioner AND The State of AP Rep. by fs Pri Secy Deparment of MAS U 5 - oO, oo CSE Secrefanal Velagapucl, Amaravall, Guntur District. « The Greater Visakhapginam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapatnam, Rep by iis Commissione : 3. Mis .Hayagresva Farms and - Dev elapers, Door Na §-20-s0/4, FlatNo.S02, 4° Floor, Sukshelra East Point, Egat Point Colony, Visakhapatnam S320017 Rep by its Managing Partner, 4. (hn. Jagadeeswarudu, So Rama.Ran, Aged about 64 years, Occ Business. Rio D.Na 2-348, Krishna Poultries, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh . Respondents in fie ciroumstances stated in the aviday et fed therewith, the High Court may be pleased fo issue an appropriate Wit or order or direction more particularly in the mature of (Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the action of Responder No.2 herein in issuing proceedings vide BA No TO8G/S050/B/2 VY DAV2027 (e-office-S99800) dated OB. G7 2084 eeping the Buliding permission granted to the Respondent No.3 in abeyance and further directing the Respondent No.S to stop the work and not to proceed adith any further construction aay adiely because of the civ! disputes mending between the Respondent No. 3 and Res pondent No.4 as being Heal, armtrary, unjust, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, violative of the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Muricipal Corporation Act, T@55 and violative of Anicies 74. 27 and. S004 of the Constitution of india and Consequently set aside the proceedings vide BA.No, TOS8/ 3900/82 1/YDAZ021 {e-office-299800) datad 06.07 2024 Issued by the Respondent No.g i& NO 1 OF 2026: Petition under Section 154 of CRC is fled praying that in. the crcumstances stated in the aff davit fied in aupport of the petition, the High Gourt may be pleased fo suspend the operation of proceadings vide BLA No TO86/Q980/B/2 TY DA/Z02 1 e-office-299800) dated OS.O7 2024 issued by Respondent No.2, Pending disposal of WP 19746 of 2024, on the file of the High Court. | The pelion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition arn the afidavit Hed in support thereaf and the order of the High Court dated 28112084, W212 2024, 02.09 2029, DLO) 2025, 26.07 2025, QO.02 2025, TSO 2025, 1902 S088, 18.038, 2025, O8.05.2025, 20.12.2028, 27.01.2088 & 17.02.2028 made hersin and upon hearing the argurnents of Sri eaiepe Yashwanth, Advocate, Advocaie far the Petifioner and of GP MUNCIPA ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP for the Respondent Nod and of Si J. Die een Kumar, Standing Counsel for the Respondent No.2 and of Sd Bodduluri Srinivas Rao, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4. WRIT PETITION NO: 49757 OF 2624 Sehvea: ge fg Vallabhant Bujlvaju, Sfo Subbanna, Aged aboul 72 years Rio H.No.538, Vex dullakunte, Gopalnuram Mandal, West Godavan-534318 - Petitioner : is PrSecy Department of MAS urituy DY > S a So, f FS Sy he + The State of AP., Secretarial Velagapi a " 7 t on wy heads wh ifs 73 age. + "9%, ths « £44 rag] 4 fy ge% gb we seers *, ' ten 4 ae ame: A "ey 2 en) ns "i no RS eT Oe ie Oe G8 ~ 2 © bE on o € 8 @ 2 2 € a & LS eo my Cy 8 a oa CO o/c cad e. Sh oi aa 4 % Sr eae ia a an ane S sy Ree i £7 £3 "e4 LE cape on St [ay] % kad 8 i a od " A: ' a . - Gore oan a G ed is oecee rs ef B oe rans e & & 2B fe G&G me go eB aS: B be ey 7 > th 'n aa ~s Adee 8 vm hese ote % ween a oN oe Be, & t% @ BS B % G mw & a a £ ae BOS m 3 5 & 6 & © . B pom SE ies fe ee Ch es mo : he pee gs fee sheet eo os no ya end pose Bn me gt ee oe ne Cas ne ee © es Q etn ms bod oe ed ; Y " & hecause af i ¥ N a ner u we & a g proceed Nis a) , Se en ee 7 few. Sn? - " if es ay B "a ta % Fic Faas 2 4 4 re hecen, r peered EN i andent Nod 3s | : 3 onsifition nN my Par a Lo as m, - S hy nH SS 8 ht fer or direction mars gf * g i SS > & ne 1e % a ke a a3 ' < : g Ae Saws : x sr BS ar are) 8. a . co ms a ne, im we o "x03 2 oe $ eer: won EL pen Fa ee . nee pooee * hove (e 4 een i neo ite reer 1 a3 " aoa acs ay = oS 6% us Se fee. oy om es ote Cok Sie. an 7 "> ee an nr Are ane ee me OO, BS 4 eo oe gis ae) % Love 4% gaa ie Lae gy. 'ncaa boot ow age * weeee bed Sonat ¢ a been is a aaa Py al ro feewe. Ale Fan ONS ris 3 fh FY Pe ty go a a wg BO ef th wey vee oy a 2 he Bo Om 8 wm Eg fh om Be Re Be oy oo ae im pA ; re a rn = ci < rr on a oe oxi ra Sole bee ceed f ccs © an oa 7; a. ane? re Mig alow" age we Py 53 wee t ¢ ONG a rah Pot t7 Pa ot <" a bed aS o% 44° tere wi othhg Seow * . ben ee Bd cn Se ae nr oP whi pag mi, eed cheer, is ry teat cdl ies Aid 63 £5 wy, on ee) ae i fet, ewe Se "a OG 2 4 3% 2 & GS wR me mb we SR Do . ee ; a an; t te oY ge . & B & 8 EF ~ a, are ' > Ep OS fe "_ Be 8 po & s Bw wm td "we he oy See t 1, Ke " Sn ' a ay dove eee ' ese " " ; ~ fen a H ne: wa % me oo eer, "Ng "s Meee, heed 2 rn, @O 2 a £ 2 Y 6S © 2 & & B EE we 2% a a od pe "eed iy ioe ED ip mm ST em BD bres Ph ge oe 6 go B we. 2 ne en) © VS a > SC a OB at aos ue th BO a > a se > é A to ea oS tot Ber ng ' wo ORG Ame ae its ' Ine a) wy on 5 fn ie "5% wm TY Co oe ¢ as Ee ~ ; 5 cst & ee Paes ~ ee Eley eine he, my Monn " ee a a a on an a OC = £2 € SG . & SG wi whee ete, Senn Be eon, been £4 foes rs) ead aoed Seat pen ead ei oh. 1 ale tae fede ED i . $3 oA Spot £3 fy ee af $e i ke wo " oy 4 ook ee me HS a os & Bo tM Ie te, ee aa nn, gent ES fen 0 Se SOO ti c 8 om BP & wm & A YB > ; ns ae ve kh ss 6 am et Bm mw oS BS Fs af Eh " , oe 2 w © Oe BB pn S&B we DB ey % a3 og > a a nr?) a nT <a ean a7 5 tee od ye + yaad & yee thew oe 2d Sean, 'ege er ra '3 wy, ef Mi dh TEL, a. A 0. . (Fhe mh... 8 i or rn oe ns Se ond. SORERY x & " F Court may be pleased to Suspend the operation of proceedings vide BLA. No] O86/S960/B/2 UY DAIZ08 lie-office- 205800) dated 08.07 2084 issued by Respondent No.2, Pending disposal oP WP 19781 of 2024, on the fle af the High Court, : The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit fled) in support thereof and the earlier Order of the High Court obs. 17 2024, 12.72.2024, 04.01.2025, 09.01 2025, 24.01.2028, 06.02.2085, 17 OS 2026 made herein and pon hearing the arguments of SR} RALEPU YASHWIANTH, Advocate for the Petilianer and of GP MUNCIFPAL ADMN AND VRBAN DEV AP for the Respondent No.1 and of SRI JGILEEP KUMAR, Agvocate for the Respondent No.2 and of SRI BODDULURI SRINIVAS RAO, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4. WRIT PETITION NO: 19752 OF 2024 Between: . Gadde Lakshmana Rac, Sio G Ramachandra Rao, Aged about 80 years Rio Doar No 1247, GadedeVari Street, utlayagudem, Ganapavaram Mandal, West District $4447, Petitioner AND 1. The State of AP. Rep. by is PriSecy Department of MAS UD, Secretarial Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. | 2. The Greater Visakhapainam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhanainam, Reso by iis Cornmmissioner, lad . Mis. Hayagreeva Farms and Developers, oor No.8-20-20/1, FiatNo.S02, 4"Fioor, Sukshetra East Point, East Polini Colony: Visakhapatinam- 530077 Rep by its Managing Pariner. 8 s Respondents t y Be : ix g x nden g proces 4 3 farm, Aciarsh Reso 8 Mi mmder or direction more & a ~ M g xy SUING * ying " x : oF 5 7) oft % . 3 Rae a Ris e dent No.4 ash u wt x Corporation Ac i stop the work and not tn proceed g 4 Respan Me % rea . i. 3g ay oF " 3. me oot > < > oF Ne awe & A gz aS t wt yy of x affidavit fisd therewith, th $ : § r 4 ; : > 3 ; OF + 3 Ri NO CHor $ ES x ticks 3 + Mespondent No & HY . the actio: 3 3 * AC S35 'y gt x : : eae r, Visakhapal 2 Ri Q z x ure oF WH of Mar x re] $ oy e ;, umlust, violative A Not 4 OF 2024 Hy a Hue, Patt NA Ny Als ket SS ced Gh. a x EN 2 a r e particular a. g 2 eased io issue an aporcona the nal $ ering beiween th and firthier dire = IANO High OrOvisions in the mo 3 * . vide & oroumstance 2 perusing the Pet ay g 3 nm for heark rs Seed bah THN 'as t Pas oe Tre peliiion ¢ : Ny & y : : of my YA 5 wa - 5 3 ; Ni yf ihe 2 Se 44 3 2025, 2 3 Ras XS x re 5 < -- 8 Sy, > PE OH Aes in sumport thereat arc 24, £8.44 208 nm ws FS.0e2.2025, 18.02.2025, 18.03.2025, 08.05 9025, 20.12.2025, 27.07.2025 & VF GS. 2088 made herein and upc in hear ing the argumenis of Sn KALCEPD YASHWANTH, Advocate for the Petitioner and of GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP for the Respondent Not and of SRI JDILEEP RUMAR, Standing Counsel for the Respondent Na 2. WRIT PETITION NO: 19753 OF 2024 Sebween: e Gadde Muniswara Rao, S/o Ramachandra Rac, Aged about 68 years Rfo Door No 7701, Bolline Variveechi, Yernagudem, West Godavan-53431 3. Petitioner 1. The State of AP. Rep. by fs Pri Secy Desartment of MA& UD, Secretariat Velagapudi, Amar ravatl, Guntur (istrict. 2. The Greater Visakhapainam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapainam, Rep by is Commiasioner. M/s.Hayaqresvya Farms and Developers, Door.No.6-20-20/1, FlatNo.502, 4"Fioor, Sukshetra East Point, East Paint Colony, Visakhapainam- 530017 Rep-by ts Managing Partner. Os 4. Ch. Jagadeeswarudu, Sfo Rame Rao, Aged about G4 years, Occ. Business, Rio D.No.g-349/1, Krishna Pouliries, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhapatnam, . mespandenis Petiion under Articie 225 of the Constitution of India is Med praying that nthe circumstances stated in the affidavit Hed therewith, the High Courl may be pleased fo issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more pariicularly n the nature of "Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the Respandenis more pariicularly the action of Respondent No.2 herein in issuing proceedings vide B A No TO8@/S960Q/B/21/YDA/2021 {e-office-299800) dated 05.07 2024 keeping the Building permission granted to the Respondent No.3 in abeyance and further directing the Respondent No.3 to stop the work and not to proceed WHR any further conetruction activity solely because of the cad disoutes pending beiween the Respondent No.3 and Respondent No.4 as being Hegal arblvvary, unjust violative of Principles of Natural Justice, violative of the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and violative of Articles 14. 2) and SQA of the Constitution of India and consequentiy sel aside the proceedings vide BLA. Na TOSS agsqar4 nAtoe (e-office-S99800) dated O8 07.2024 issued by the Respondent IANO: 4 OF 2084: Petition under Section 181 of CPC is fled praying that in the ont circumstances stated in the a Mdavil Ned in support of the petition, fhe Nig Court may be pleased fo suspend the operation of praceedings vide S.ANo. POSH 2O8O/ Be TY DA20e2 Tis-ofice 299800) dated Q6.07 2024 issued by Respondent No.3, Pending disposal of WP 19753 of 2084. on the file of the Nigh Gourt Fre petition camming on for hearing yupoNn perusing the Peliion and the afidavil fled in support thereof andthe order of the se Gaunt dated Yashwanth, Acvocate for ihe Petitioner and of GP MUNCIPAL AOMN AND URBAN DEV AP for fhe Respondent No.] and of SRI J DILEEP RUMAR, tend 3 me NS Co i ed Os Standing Counsel for the Respondent Nos. WRIT PETITION NO: 19785 OF 2084 Soetween: Ashania Venkateswar Rao, S/o A Satyanarayana, Aged aboul G2 years Rio Door Ne 3 Vy, Sangayagudem, Devarapalll Mandal, West Godavari 34343. . Petitioner AND 1. The State of AP. Rep. by Is FriSecy Department of MAS UD, secretarial, Velagapucdi, Amaravatl, Guntur District, 2. The Grealer Visakhapatnam: Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapainam, Reo by tts Commissioner. | 3. M/s Hayagreeva Farms and Developers, DoorNo.@-a0-20/4, Flat.No.508, 4° Floor, Sukshetra Rast Foil, East Pomt Colony, Visakhapatnam 830017 7 Rep by iis Managing Partner NY . Uh. Jagadeeswarudu, Sie Rama Rao, Aged about 64 years, Gen. be Be Business. Rio D.No.2-d40/4- Krishna Poulties, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhapainam. | » Maespondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is Med praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit Med therewith, the High Court may be pleased {fo issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly in the mature of "Writ of Mandamus'. declaring the action of the Respondents more partiaularly the action of Respondent No.2 herein in issuing proceedings vide B LA No 1OS56/3980/ BIATYDAIL0 24 (e-office- 299800) dated 06.07 208 keeping the Building permission Granted to the Respondent No.3 in abeyan 'Bn £4 Dp and further directing the Respondent No.3 to stop the wark and not to proceed with any further construction activify solely because of the an! disputes sending beiween the Respondent Nos.d& 4 as being Hiegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of Frincipnies of Natural Justice, viclalive of the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and violative of Articles i427 and 300A of the Gonsiitullon of india and Consequently sel aside the proceedings vide BLA.No. 1O8S/2800/R/ZT/YDAIZ021 (e-office- 299800) dated 06.07 2024 issued by the Respandent No.2. IA NO: 1 OF 2024: ry Ss shea? ary SEVEN BO 2024 issuad wy Jf ae ~ Fact wt S tach O "3 KG ign an ata R ay ok emimng on for hearing, upon perusing the Pe Pa aX. re OY x 2 The peti % > POPES S ® argurenis of SRI RALERY 3 my z an &3 y ae RS oy. a ih & ¥ : 0 es 3 XM coq 3 wy i? fa Ne "sf Vek 2 x x iy} 2028 made herein and upon hear way < < s O02 " ; q afiddavi fed YASHIANT > & t Novt a: esponden the RR oF AP £ tts, ont Petitioner <wporation, Vishakhapainam, es . 28 3 é AND So $ x S} 49 2S Terse8 OF 2084 x x x > D043. "> x ° Plot no 44, Kalass a AS f, Secretariat Velacan wy \ Visakhanainan Advocates for the Responden WRIT PETITION NO Satwesn So oe Flat No.S02, 4"Floor, Sukshetlra East Point, East Point Canny, Visakhapainam- S30017. Rep by iis Managing Partner ih. Jagadeeswarudu, S/a Rama Rao, Aged about 64 years, Occ. Business. RYo D.No.2-349/1, Krishna Poultries, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhanainam. a Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitufion of India is fled praying in the circumstances staled in the affidavil fled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or arder or direction more particularly in the nature of "Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the Respondents mye particularly the action of Respondent No.2 herein in issuing proceedings vide B A No. 1088/S98(/B/2 VY DAZ021 (e-office- 3990800) dated 05.07 2024 seeming the Building permission qranted to the Respondent No.3 in abeyance and further directing the Respondent No.3 to stop the work and nol fo prooged with any further construction activity solely because of the civil disputes pending between the Respondent No.3 and Respondent No.4 as being Nlegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, violative of the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1855 and x violative of Articles 14, 21 and SG0A of the Cenetitution of india and rete Consequently set aside ne proceedings yikes BLA.No. TO86/Q980/B/2 VY DAIZ02 1 (e-office-209800) dated (6.07 2024 issued by the Respondent No.2 iA NO: 7 OF 2024: 2 Petition under Section 197 of CPO is filed praying [nat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fled in support of {he petition, the High Gaul may be oOleased fo suspend the operation of proceedings vide B.A.No. 1086/S960/8/2 1/YDA/202 1 (e-olfice-209800) dated 06.07.2024 issued by Respondent No.3, Pending dispo! seal of WP 18756 of 2024, on the file of the The petition coring on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the Na ES: 3 PRCQ QP Oy A AE 47> Coe hs PRR HY "ye "~ oN SUK PNA PEPIN TEA Soa AMD Sy Sk Sete 26.71.2024, 12.12.8026, GOT 20S8, 89.07. 2085 34.01 SOS5, G6.0e F085. VS02 2085, 19.08.2088, 16.03.2025, 89.05. 2025, S012 2025, 2P.O1 S028 & 47.02. 2026 made herein and unan hearng the arguments of SRI KALEPU YASH WANTS, Advooate for the Petitioner and of GP MUNC PAL ADMN ANTS Advocate for ihe Respandent No.2 and of SR] BODDULURI SRINIVAS RAO. Adi vocate for the Respondent Nos 3 & 4. y Sob. WRIT PETITION NO: 1876? OF 2024 Setveenr: Gadde Sameswara Rao, Sfo G Ramachandra Rao, Aged about 82 years, Ria Door No 1247, Gadde Vari Street, Bulfayagudem, Ganapavaram Mandal, West Godavari Distric Sa4447, . Patitionar tof MA& UD, wee oA mes he oh) i potn oD 3 een ba a we A crepe por eA "tS 4 fz) oe 3 Pe "Ze o e hy oe 3 % wok 2. The Greater Visakhapatnam Muricipal Corporation, Vishakhanatnam, Rep by iis Commissioner. Lae oe Wis Nayagreeva Farms and Developers, DoorNo&-20-20/1, Flat\No.502, 4°Floor, Sukshetra East Point, East Point Colony, Visakhapainam- SSO01y, Res by ts Managing Partner 4. Ch. Jagadeeswarudu, S'o Rarma.Rac, Aged about S4 years, Oee. Business. Rio D.No.2-34S/9, Krishna Paulinies, Ol Dairy Farm, Adarsh Respondents Fetiion under Aricie 226 of ihe Ganstiutean of indie is fled praying that 2 a tec therewith, the High Court may in the oycurmstances stated | be Meased io issue an aApproprials weit or order ar direction more partiqularly in the nature of 'Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the Respondents more parloularly the action of Responder No.2 herein in issuing procesdin ies aS vide BLA No. TO86/S960/B(2 1/YDAI2021 (e-offine- 299800) dated OS.0/ 2084 keeping the Building permission granted to the Respondent No in abeyance and further directing the Respondent No.3 fo stop the wark and not to proceed with any furiher construction activity solely because of the civil dispe ules pending between the Respondent No. 3 and Raspondent No.4 as being egal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, violative of the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and yialative of Articles 14, 21 and' 300A of the Constitution of India and Corsequentily sat aside the proceedings vide BLA.No. 1086/S900/B/2 1 YDA208 1 {o-office-299800) dated 06.07 2084 issued oy the Respondent Nos. iA NO: 1 OF 2024: Petition under Section 157 of CPC is fled praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Count may be pleased io suspend fhe operation of proceedings vide BLA No. JO88/Q98I/B/2 1/Y DA202 Te-office-299800) dafed 0G.07 204 issued by Respondent No.2, Pending disposal of WF 1977 of 2024, an the file of the High Court. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Peltion and the affidavit (Ned in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated 28.11.2024, 12.12.2084, 03.01.2085, 09.01.2025, 24.01.2025, ao WBOH22028, 19.02.2025, 18.09. 2025, 08.09.2025, 20.12 2025, 27.04. 17.02.2026 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Kalepu Yashwanth, Advocate for the Pe atifioner and of GP MUNCIFAAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP for the Respondent No.1 and of SRI LDILEEP KUMAR, Advocate for fhe Respondent No.2. WRIT PETITION NO: 78798 OF ooe4 Rehweean: age Lakamsarl Krishnavernd, Wo Chakradhara Rao, Aged about Fi years Rio Doar No case, Sri Salya Sal Nivas Old CB! Down, Visakhapatnam San o1y | Patitionser 1. The Stsle of AP. Rep. by fs { BH 1 Secy Department of MAS UD, Secretariat, Velagapud!, Amaravall, Guritur District, 2. the Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhasainar, me) Rep by is Commissioner. 3. Mis.Hayagreeva Farms and. -- Develapers, DoorNo.G20.20/1, Flat. No.§02, 4° Floor, Sukshetva. East Point, East Point Colony, Visakhapainam- 530077. Rep by is Managing Partner 4. Ch. Jagadeeswarudu, Sfo Rama Ran, Aged about 64 years, Occ. Business, B/o D.No.2-3491, Krishna Poultries, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhapainam. Respondents Petition under Article 266 of the Consttution of India is Med praying that in the circumstances stated in the eficavit Hed therewith, the » FHgK cour may be pleased fo issue an apprapriaie Wei or order or direction more particularly inthe nature of (init of Mandamus' declaring the action af the Respondents more particularly the action of Respondent No.g herein in issuing proceedings vide BLA No TO8G/S960/R/2 /YDAS02 1 fe-office-289800) dated G8. OF 2oe4 keeping the ne permission granted fo the Respondent No.3 in abeyance and further directing the Respondent No.3 fo stop the work and not to proceed with any further construction activity aciely because of the civil dismutes pending between the Respondent No.3 and Respondent No.4 as being Hegal, arbifvary, unjust, violative of Princinleas of Natural Justice, viniative of the oe provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and 4 NE Ny violative of Ariicies 14. and SOOA of the Cansitution of India and Consequenly sef aside the proceedings vide 8.A.No 1088; ar. ara SOOTY DA202 1 (e-office-200800) dated O6.07 2024 issued by the IA NO:> 7 OF 2086: Petition urcer Section TSt of CPC is fed praying that in the circurnatances stated in the affidavit fled in support of the petition, the High g Gout may be pleased to suspend the operation of proceedings vide BLA.No, 1086/S960/ 8/2 1/Y DAZ08 fle-office- 299800) dated OG.07 2024 issued by Respondent No.2, Pending disposal of WP 19798 of 2024, on the He of the High Court. | The petiion corning on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated BEIT 2028, 12.12. 2084, 03.04.2025, O8.07 2028, 24.07. 2025, 06.02 2025, (3.02. 2025, 19.02.2025, 18.08. 2026, 08.05.2025, 20.12.2088, 27.07 20e0 & T7.O2. 2028 made hersin and upon hearing the arguments of SRI KALEPU YASHWANTH, Advocate for ihe Pelitioner and of GP MUNCIRAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP for the Respondent No.1 and of SRI J.DILEEP KUMAR Advocate for the Respondent No.3 and of SR] SRINIVAS RAO BODDULURI, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4. RIT PETITION NO: 19804 OF 2024 Hahween: Eadala Narayana Rao, Sia. £. Verraju, Aged about 67 years, Rio. Door. No. 21371, Munisinu Gari Veedhi, Kall hetu, hast Godavari - $33705, . Petiianel 'AND 1, The State of AP. Rep. by is PriSeny Deparment of MA & UD, Secretariat, Yelagapudi, Amaravali, Guriur District y =. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapainam, & Rep by is Canwnissioner, BS Nae £53 x. Ry IBENO S08. A™Rloor, Sukshetra rast Point, mast Point Cofany, oy $. Oh. lagadecsw varuidu, Sig Rarna Rao, Business. Rio D.No.2-340/1, Krishna Pouliries, Old Dairy farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhapainant. Respandents Petition under Ariicie 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that a rAH. vom in ihe ciroumstances stated in ihe affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may c be pleased fo issue an apprapriate Wit or order or direction more particularly fs Z in the nature of 'Wri of Mandamus' declaring the action of the Reapondents wre more particularly the action of Respandent No.2 herein in issuing proceedings vide BA No TOSS/S90Q(/E/S T/YDAOS 1 (e-office- 299800) dated G8.07 202 keeping the Bulicing pannission oranted to the Respondent No.S in abeyance and further directing the Respondent No.3 fo stap the work and not to oroceed wih ary further conmsinucton aclvity sc tely because of the civil disnutes arbitrary, uruet, vicdative of Principles ss of | Netural Justice, violative of the orovisions of the Gresier Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1885 and violative of Ariiclas 74, 2] and BOOA--of } Carisequently gel aside the proosedings vile GLA No TOas/S080/Bi2 VY DAI2021 fe-office-299800) dated 06.07 2024 issued ae Si PRS . & A? »y by the Rassondent No.2 IANO: 1 OF 2634: Petition under Section TS) af CPC is fled praying thet in the Fe croumstances sited in the affidavit Hed in support of the petition, the High S.A.No. 1088/S8680/B/2 1/¥ DA208 1{e-office- 299800) dated O6.07 2024 issued by Respondent No.2, Pending disposal of WP 19801 of 2024. on the file of the mc the aperation of proneedings vide High Court. The peiifion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Pefiian and ihe affidavit fled in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated aoa TS. 12.2024, O3.07.2025, 08.049 2005, 24.07 2025, 06.06 20385, S.02. 2025, 19.02.2025, 18.05 2025, 08.05.2028, 20.12.2085, 27.07 2088 & £02. 2026 made herein and upon hearing the argumenis of SRE RALERO YASHWANTH, Advocate for the Petitioner and of GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP for the Respondent No.} and of SRI LDILEEP KUMAR, Sanding Counsel for the Respondent No.2 and of SRE BODDULUR! SRINIVASA RAQ, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4. WRIT PETITION Ni: (9873 OF 2bed Between: Aluri Rao Venkata, S/o Allur' Rathaish, Aged about 72 years, Rfo Door No q200, Kornagndam, Butlayagudem, Ganapavaram Mandal, West Godavari S34447 1. Petitioner AND 1. The State of AP. Rep. by fs PriGecy. Deparment of MAS UD: Secretarial Velagapudl, Amaravati, Guntur District. é. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapatinam Reo by iis Commissioner. 3. Mis. Hayagreeva Farms and Developers, Door No.@-s0-20/1, Fiat No.502, 4"Floor, Sukshetra East Point, East Point CoOvny, Visakhapatnam 530017. Ren by ts Managing Pariner 4. Ch. Jagadeeswarudu, Sfo Rama Reo, Aged about 64 years, Occ, Business. Rio D No. 2-340/1, Krishna Poulyies, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhapatnam. . Respondents Peiition under Aricie 225 of the Constitution of India is fled praying that in the circumstances stated In the: all davil fled therewith, the High Court may "tye fis "4 5 A eT ry , oe 2 OC D2 wt & Oo ga w oe Be £ & #2 wo fw Mr, ES & a Li agen, Ke Ey 3) ws ach "dg oe BS pa at ra) a4 eh ras ae ie a ta ay Bo ES BE yom ee p oo ees: Ge z eg te GS / there wae he si a 3 OD of ih. " re Joos r nis: ye Ay (ek 2%, eet % % ie 2 e" ~~ fe ep "er wy hE f we 8 5 Oke me OD , cr ne: oebee AG ; i se Noon " @ oh oe gs 6 2 & Spee A wn Fs ed aa 1 fe g Be AO G MB eB Be ow ws i By Bg ee we GB te By ewe ee te we o 3 Soe % ae Se. < " oe, tape ete 4 os, Loa pin x z *, ° ' P a Bow & wo & os GE & oo ti & @ & oa a Y a te a tt My te fo ey tye O HM of Ba i * ga GS . "a GS "tn ned pm t% © s het ass AED oh ie aA @ a ey "ay us ad ee oe on ee ee ty o a ae C2 ty ; 'eones eed ke ke oe Ea nt pe wee fin oy % ae) gee CS, e ora cel ecbed toh ae wy C3 ves, ary ee ee Be fe feat a yee 4 ren a al 5a) "3 ys Am reet wo iv & 6 is ad DQ nd co ge a a oes est ° ; is tases og is . ee a a : % yc gs oboe Sas t £ fie wee? 2 wares > ' Mad s, naan re wrens ed yen a: ere, - ete heed Pal benene poe ewe ok were a Be we Se =< 2 & & %e srg, we oh . wn ll HS i 2 wm @ de fm ee OB AS Boe, TM po cep Ea BF AES BE oS Boge G Ue a. a aS 2 Pieoes mere 7 ' ote 4 wie " lane " ne Ct oe oe 8 5S ep oa Ge. Bs soe ~~ Ge SE i wo oad res mw rs, 4 we on ra ed at s 6 6oa z 'a bee . vs Oo p ££ @& @ " UG & 4 x 2 & G oy a Oo M&M 8 & Nel! thd we %& ws thy oh. wood noone, ay it yan bods 4 %) ed oo Sad " on £% whens at oat, daton, '4 ¢ ft .! kde " J % 4 oy ae, . We Ng oe DB, oy Om me OF ao Fa pe ieeoed ve at " : "3 Me "4 i ae on re i ' ee me BBN Boa OG tie oe eS ie eS oe 5 - i ad sof eee re . "we AY ue bod a oy tts ee . wien Ee oF 2 Se GL CH my fe BB my ee OE et we th & "eS fed 7 os rH oe te of GE gag cae me: Th ve Sed By gee ww woot ae 'nadine pond oe is Lad - S ce brow oe) rat to Pree z Coe CS tapes et an m3 ron te, ee sa Be 7 ro 3) a Of ed ras Wb gees, spr Ww ee ee) tan, 7 Le m, ongen, is A eae Ba oa ! ee, foo . '« 4 vs, fA tn BD "Ww @ om & Thom he, 3 Ga aa egy ages A lana a ws BR sake i od ie 3 yn ben ae £34 ih a iy te or " = 'to a Km ty oe se ke ty om BG Cy tee ne (en <r an Ke Ge ag woos 6B og fee ile pee ao B yn d Cc G@& goo & on ed gs oy Oe , i ls » & © £ oe x a om 4 mR EL fe ee Be 2 B® &€ & Kt Gow rs , Bel SS gm Sh am 2 aes o on O§F 8 & wy fi ee B © 2B Hs rh ang 6 , m& © @ @ ye e & OB pe a 6 t& ES 6 oS we bk Ch. Bo» Bm 6 I he wt v a gc: 6 ee a £3 wn a "Ee en a nae 5 "ER we ee aes te we tt : 7 ES oat wt ie Oy ws rm , a if 5S me SH % te IME og as oN wm = " ie e8 ae, ewe we. ieee Fy C3 Pseee St Od paon tod we a3 ; on gey ee a o # Fone, ss : tooo. . Bo & © © 2 Ee B&B hoe & @ & Hel CO fm 1 we 4 : Bog ss gy oe we YY a ae ts KG gn te, oom oH. vate esd oD Pe teed omen 4 4 bt cm ; OF, a - ann on <6 as i: a i tS BD 3 og AG fe SS deve . Bove rth y, 6G, 3 " ae feve od fs eee tooo cast xo oe be rs 5, " oe nh, 6 3 ke Oe 4 ae " @ te Be ns ~ OS bee ie Oo So BE gw BF , @& . 2 " £ Se oe op OB ow oe eS m Ae Rp 2 fe Seane ve " we oe ", ' D ' , 4 7 * ren, ' 3 5» ~m € B & £€ BE BZ Be 8 Q BE 2 2 ft BroAaSB SS oi hg a tT do gt Le ot TR ee ee ; me 107 " Syeq oe Spon BD cd eee g " © 2 6 & 2B ge Ee BR tc zy nes %o C2 0. fe CE a i. Sh cor re o & &€ & » @ 2 4 6 ALS G 52 aa eto. pecee Sen we water. Standing Counsel for the Respondent Nog and of SRI BODDULURI WRIT PETITION NO: T88"8 OF 2024 Between: Achania Ramarao, Sfo Jagadeeswararan, Aged about 72 years Rfo Door No S145, Gandhi Nagaram, Yernagudem, West Godavarl-534313. . Pelitioner AND . The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by iis Pri Secy Department of MA and UD, Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravatl, Guntur District. 2. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapatnam: Map by Hs Cammissioner. tat Wis.Hayagreevya Farms and Oevelopers, Ooor.No.6-s0-20/1, FlaLNo.502, 4° Floor, Sukshetra East Point, East Point Colony, Visakhapatnans 530017. Rep by iis Managing Pariner 4. Ch. Jagadeeswarudu, S/o Rama Rao, Aged about G4 years, Occ. Business. Rio D.No.s-d40/1, Krishna Pouliries, Ok! Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhanainam:. Respondenis Paiition under Ariche 226 of the Constitution of India is Hled praying that in the circummetances stated in the alfidawt fled therewith, the High Court may be leased fo issue an aopropriaie Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of 'Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the acthan of Respondent No.2 herein in issuing praceedings vide BLA No. 108S/89S80/B/2 1/YDAIZ021 (e-office-299800) dated 08.07.2024 keeping the Building permission granted fo the Respondent No.3 in abeyance and further directing the Respondent No 3 fo stop the wark and not to oroceed with any further construction activity solely because of the civil dispules pending between the Respondent No. and Respondent No.4 as being Hlegael, arbirery, unjust, violative of Principles of Natural Just foe, vigdalive of the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Murucipal Corporation Act, 1855 and violative of Articles 14. 21 and 300A of the Canstitvion of indie ang G onsequently set aside AS proceedings vide 8 gene. Ry . eS QRH iS 4 % FREY KTM odo Been ont SNe . A SEO SSO NS TY DAZ0E 1 Ce iio: 298800} dated OG.O7 S024 issued IANO: 1 OF 2024: Pettion under Section 153 of ¢! if fled graying that in circumstances stated in the affidavit Hed in sumpert of the pelitien, the High Court may be Oe to oan the scam cot of proceedings vide BLA Respondent Nog, Pending dissosal of WP T0878 of 2084. on the file of the Ths petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Pelition and the ore ba ae no a Fu vere nN fe iC fo Ben "a < hg ae Po 43 wy ae enudl, hg ae, fe) an VEO2.2026 made fersin anc upon nearing tHe arguinenta of KALEPU YASHWANTH, Advocate for fhe Petiioner and of GP MUNCIPAL ADAMAN AND Standing Counsel fer the Respondent Nog and of SRE BODOULUR: SRINIVASA RAO, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.o & 4. WRIT PETITION NG: 18980 OF 2028 Setween: Lanka orinivasa Reo, Sfo Srramulu, Aged about 86 years, Rfo Door No xs S731S0, Saibaba Street, Dabagardans, Visakhapainam-Sanno: Petitioner AND }. The State of AP. Rep by its Prt Secy Depariment of MA& UD, Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravatli, Guntur District. *. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municinal Corporation, Vishakhapainam, Rep by is Cammissioner. . Mis. Hayagreeva Farms and Developers. Door No.6-c0-20) tf, Fiat No.§02, 4° Finer, Sukshetra East Point, East Point Colony, Visakhanainam- S30017. Rep by ts Managing Partner 4. Ch. Jagadeeswarudu, S/o Rama Rac, Aged about 64 years, Ooms Business. R/o D.No.2-349/1, Krishna Poultries, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visakhapatnam. : | Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Conetitution of india is fled praying thal in the circumstances slated in the affi clavil fled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly in the mature of 'Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the action of Respondent No.2 herein in Ssuing proeeaings vide & A No 1Oe86/3080/B/2 /¥Dévedet (e-office-298800) dated 06.07 2024 keeping the Building permission granted to the Respondent No.3 in abeyance ie and further cireating the Respondent No.3 to sfep the work and not to proceed with any further construction ac cll ity solely because of the civil disputes pending beiween the Respai ndent No.3 3 and Respondent No.4 as being Hiegal, provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1855 and wy arbirary, unjust, viglalive of Princip! es of Natural Justice, violative o violative of Anicles 74, 217 and 400A of the Constitution of Indie and Consequently set aside ihe proceedings vide BLA No. TO86/S960/R) ZANDA202% | fen 2-OFF joe 299800) dated O8.07 2024 issued by the Respandeni No 2. [A NO: 1 OF 2024: Petition under Section 194 of OPC is fled praying that in the circumstances stated in the aff davit f Wied in support of the petition, the HI ote 05 ? 4" segee, - eK, ey " ances ge " o , 2 BR te Beg a a Coo 2 ca i o a , ay yp on teed ee wy ee ro Se an oh Ao : , % Cows (8 SE EB x me oS oS = oe Be ty a an an oy a wh & ; He ce i a 0 a sc he Ch ad ey] ve trod Lad Pree tf a 3 wa LPS fee pene A i Pood pres ns Ld dg tA Xs ; oon ee nr or - a . inp fa fed eek we em "ee Ss "A a, we fae a e Pre £5 Cs 4 eat , a a re aA ee 4 ™ rae a a aS SO od Kee , Be Be a nn mw 8 % & 2 Re . 1 wees aped neers weed oe e vs rs aaa og BOG S eT wt EY BY oe i sy oy UR wee OE sn, as Be . oe Fed eed we oa 3 yn ee ayaa ~ "rs ae we {> «ee ie $y 'per tte, nd Yon - * si Ch ie & eas a3 , ths rr nts, oy re ; Oy Pol eG oe bro in is % dow é " , t% thos . here feve Go & nr a a. a ae en mw pe te i % fa a nr a ee fe Bee te co A mB as re oo ote ih seve te F hee Sade "gree. , DAD were : Be eed hon ve the Og me ; ys rs Ae cr a arm, vo bid ie be gi we ad ne aes "ye . wheat eG ee oe psod " * veee? vere. . tA c% ed S ood , es, rf . ee Wd an see a bree ee ry 3 ne if CA gn Noe ws hy hese fe oh. EE 4 a7 ah ae Boop a: a <a Mn (en? a ae Oy ge wm 3 wee Sot see £4 7 2 gue wd SD 3 a3 rion . iG 3 ws A m2 wo om ae oe tbe 1 ee & @ & w & gr acs on wees eed ig as fp Fel gy wool "p0 i fom res a fer Sa a i Oo ed wy OE an A ee gy td "a the Fe gee ", oo 3 -- ad : ; heen or %, Ay " ve ro veers a ye & & ee 5s Be" 8 & 8 a 6 eB ad a OG Bop BB me do. gm i og Go pny he S te GH om BL, " mB a oa ws he SS & & © @ 2B . am "¢ mo ee ee bo ow Oo Be Oe oy Boe SG ag oy fo pan © ne voor anes . ; 4 ewe ar neoee bn % g OD o mor 8 Bh 8 O bis , g BAe a; ae Bo wp OU eb YB} aet eS an an 43) uP ed Ren? anoee wd oy, cant a See. rn or, ae hee? we 34 tj £5 Ly £t%5 ewe peers . tad % "ee aa se 3 Span. < G : i$ $3 paoee rag hen iad 'one Fa 4 vege we. gen a "<< ene psd we bed oeee "fe et sheet ath ag way TAD yo aged rs As © SE 1 9 coed na gon he = ERS ford abe @ O f Go nw, fy &p HS hs A a re a 22 @ th gt bo fn mm o> t3 he xf ad a os an mr a a pahoe 2 bere wHpod: - - ee 'o yo m0 ay o Seow ; wee nny are oa a. <a ar 2 fhe ns en : 2 3 Beg . : y on ne a a ae Bo MM MM fF US a ee - & a ft he he i nn us & vores eS 2 © we oS On BE Soom nw me 2 ee Be & S 0 Ee TE Sa et ce ce SS 8 oe © PS, a pee Aged about 64 ye nagging Partner i Sy y di eS hapainam. ty x Fa adeeswan. s 5 Se Seta Jagd ~~ Pes Flat No. S02, 4° Floor, Si Nagar, Visa ~ kre : 4, o Petition under Article 228 of the Constitution of India is fled praying that in the cirournsiances stated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may be pleased fo issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly the nature of "Wind of Mandamus' declaring the action of the Respondents more pariicularly the action of Ressandant No.2 herein in issuing -- gS vide BA No. TQ8G/S980/Rf21/YDA/ZOR1 fe-office- 299800) dated 06.07 2024 keeping the Buliding permission granted to the Respondent No.3 in abeyance and further directing the Respondent No.d fo stap the work and nol to proceed with any further construction acthity sdlely because of the civd disputes pending between the Respondent No.3 and Respondent No.4 as being degal, 2 arbitrary, unjust, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, violative of the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Aci, 1255 anc viddative of Articles 14, 21 and 3O04 of the Constitufion of India and he proceedings vile werge one Cansequently 8 B.A.No. 1O86/208G/Bi2 VYDA/Z02 1 (e-office-299800) dated 06.07 2024 issued by the Respondent No.2. re) IA NOs 7 OF 2024: Petition under Section 181 of CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of ihe pelition, the High Cowl may be pleased to suspend the operation of proceadings vide BA. No 1OS88/SO80/B/F TY DAS0e t (e-office- 299800) dated 06.07 2024 iss ad by Respondent No.2, Pending dispasal of WR 19958 of 2024, on the He af the The petiion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavil fled in support thereof and the order of the High Courl dated 28.17 2024, 12.72 2024, O4.01. 2025, O8.08 2025, 24.07 202, 2025, 13.02. 2085, 19.02.2085, 18.00.2085, 08.05.2025, 0.72. 2025, 27 UT.s028 & Y ; t 53 ees & 17.02.2026 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI KALEPU £ YASHWANTH, Advocate for the Petitioner and of GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND Advocate for the Respondent Nog and of SRE SRINIVAS BAD BODNL ILUR], iy s Pe Ty ew es ero es Abaw OE BS he, WRIT PETITION NO: 19960 OF 2024 Detween: 23, Raeraaiayarn Veedhi Gowrinainam, West ¢ Godavarl-S44313. Fativioner {. The Stete af AP, Rep. by Hs PriSecy Deparment of MA& UO, Secretarial Velagapud), Amaravatl, Guntur District. = The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Vishakhapatnam, s.Hayagreeva Farms and Developers, Gsor No S20-30N, lad wn of Visakhapatnam- S30017, Rep by is Managing Partner 4. Ch. Jagadeeswarudu, Sio Rama Rao, Aged about 64 years, Qee. Susiness. Bio D.No.2-d40/7, Krishna Roulfrles, Old Dairy Farm, Adarsh Nagar, Visekhacainam. Respondents & in ihe circumstances siated in the affidayi fled therewith, the High Court ma ral? be pleased fo lasue ar aporopriaie Writ ar order or direction mare parinularly in the nature of 'Wnt of Mandamus' deciaring the action of the Respondents mare particularly the action of Respondent No.2 herein in issuing oroceedings vide BA No TO88/S800/R/2 V/YDAIZ02 1 is-office-S99800) dated G8 OF 2024 seping ihe Buliding permission granted to the Respondent No.3 in abeyance eseigt fosthosr sHeseting fen Dhemeammeion? Ala Dos efan Bees usar ae fy AeA ari further directing the Resoondent No.3 to stop The work and not fo proceed with any further construction acivity solely because of the chal disoules pending between the Respondent Nos.3& 4 as being Hlegal, arbHrary, unjust, violative of Principles of Natural dustice, violative of the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corneration Act, 1955 and violative of Articles 44. 21 and SOOA of the Constitution of India and Consequently set aside the proceedings vide BLA. No. 1O88/S980/B/2VYDA/Z021 (e-office-dO8800) dated O6.07 2024 issued by the Respondent No.2. iA NO: 1 OF 2024: Petiion under Section 157 of CPC is Hed praying that in the circumstances eiated in the affidavit fled In support of the petition, the High Coun may be mleased to suspend the operation of proceedings vide BLA No 1O86/3080/B/2 1/YDA202 1 (eofice-2990800) dated 06.07.2024 issued hy Respondent No.2, Pending disposal of WP 19960 of 2624, on the He of the High Court. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and ihe afidavil fled in supoart thereat and the order of the High Cour dated 28.77.2084, 12. We20e4, OS.01.2085, 09.07.2085, 34.07.2025, OS 02 2025, 43.02.2025, 19.02.9025, 18.09.2025, 09.05.9025, 20.12.2025, 27.01.2028 & 17.02.3028 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI KALE YASHWANTH, Advocate for the Petitioner and of GP MUNCIPAL ADMIN AND WIRBAN DEV AP for the Respondent No.i and of SRE LLDILEEP KUMAR, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 and of SRI SRINIVAS RAO BODDULUR Advocate for the Respondent Nos. & 4; WP NO: 6807 OF 2028: Between: Ws. Hayagreeva Farms and Developers, A registered Partnership firm under a the provisions of Indian Partnership Act, 1932, Naving its Office al Door No.o- 20-20/1, FlaLNa.502, 4" Floor, Guksheira - East Point, East Point Colony, Visakhapainam- 530017 Rep. by ts Managing Pariner, Gadde Brahmi, Aged 45 years, Slo. Sn Muneswara Rao. Patiioner ge cane fy ¢ oa tS ye Y tt cael nel - ra, 4s i He Bee pe gle a Of " G 3B i aw ere ie at £3 reed £5 foes ae ' G fn 3 cote Sa 1s rad iy rs K rt ret 4 te Dd Ber. Cos ge io "a te ee we ned a ees ae Bee Ce ty 4 & by" aa co a ae Be gy ms ae Soe 5 te ws a Bom me » & & w an . & & & fee Go Bh we Pn mE & & & Bm GB og a4 8 & & G 8 @ th, & & ee: Ewe BEER E Se & E-. & F & GM ® a i oe i a E68 2" 8B Go 3 eS BO ~ 2 mee fee OD £% So a ahs & oo ES ae BS £4 teed w3 LA io a 9 4 a) a a Eeee ees % saad a "Seme, 3 o bee sete " or ws ie "Ge a an Bp Bw Re oe 6a os a an be a Sacer erreer O g = 8 2 Ge an 2 EM ee Poy mw Sk POR os fe, Se OG "3 on "ee we , heres ¢ vy ge a ' sate oy ? 2 & GY c2ifigesaiziaks " & B a = > fe B68 8 £ 2 2 & SB ea & % om 2 E S ae. fone 4 ions 2 a %, Lewad ae, Fe 7 Soom z vores sett f ~ 4, . oS grr no oor rere a a. ere, nee rn ee" - of shred 4' Ned ery, a Be By fog wae ES a TS "3 % oO. & te 2 % e me wy e a z o ae ie be SE Gp ten x Ge Se" Gg a 2g = # os, o£ 6 OS Gm of, 'he oh, ie og Bo gy wee AK, ae ye aad sete %e, nen ere 0 . a SP antes segeee ; noe Feed Sere ? , co aS Son 4 ere wy SS on leer, 1 ond Bae omnes - oo EB oe ss BR 5 ¢ be es 8 go & Bo ge & A & ag Z ote oes worth "eed lees 'nett : 44 one Sees bee we "4 " om Sed % Fy pees 74, 1 ay os ke @ Bp yy HS oS a tp © ay 82 tn CS ee Ne ane eR oe BG 8 Bo Be 2 Bo % 6 BS G 6» f @ SB % : : . teen, ov ' heen oe A s %, gn capone one ci BS we ma % i, %, ve *s one oe % an: 2 TH ae wy ; a an oy ie wy a n-ne aes Nag ~~ G %B 5 6 OS fo aed bed A rn he nt re , i 4£3 eee LG "3, , Sh. ee in 7 one S ' ' ~ : 4 an 4, $a Vapor iy bere oe "ye on os ae wg 'i ee Sine ane a) [Sn Oe a? 2 < pe, < , 7 "le an an, tee he yg eo as foe @ wg ge" fe SR ' tpt ine ey "8 ies id is "a . , c , Nee ed oe iis £4 in oe fy 'an i ge oe ~ ED on 5 ee ie OS x en @ mm Bo 2 ae & £2 8 2 oe a Ae 6B 5 Sp as ys & me "9, Badan a we ot, in as non £3 ag MO loo, cnc so eed aw ng Se 7 cater . a) rai 4, Miron . 4 wernes bee. ne eceet ogee $i, aes ae ee 6 CS ; as oe rey] tr seed ten 7% et ge 7 C5 a apy, eon co eel fy pee, Shene Go Oo ff Sf a me ES rye " & 2 me s & mi £3 Bie go ms Cy & ¢ bas 'e ra SS yn an aan & OE % & BR fe > Fis 8 wi & ce merss és a ow Se @ 2 Sg efhex¢ & 24 eB a 2 2 @ ge & - ms, . mex fim ; Bho ge O ye LL & . : Fe oth 5 Ste BSG ad : ort pit on a _ hone i fe odes be sh forne ey ne a Men a 4 eee % e « a ne we Gy ges ns iL) & oo & we ks we OS £ ® a) SS OG sr ans oe 6 te Cy gen pe yr a aaa ry ge wi " x Ch oo tft G vnpe > > & ' Loe ve a 4 a i004 ad ee coeds Co ae roar aot <3) % er hed « A oy fing 5 ge ae ang ae wy ee & & SOE pope TE G ., fee = & SF ete ae tae a ae fe ay hs Cp Te OF *A fF wm Os a 6 as oe Es a oeen sales ees * sent wot ; . Co "4 ws * os Gy FS ag LE fon = & 2 » £ a 2 BZ & c Y wm OE Boss ae 6 © a nt oS fen he a one Bo es fee gt Pa F ee ty en as ve a em Seed i "em oY om 2 ob iB | Boa B AO « ER 2 8 2 a ne , 7 a a Jobe it wo ge re Ch. "ye ht a es wen Me nan vace sete & £4 oe fet sgeens wn ae Ge ge ge hoon fe yo 83 eo eS fee i ag he ES ee Ew I 4 ra ms fron ¥ gw ZB aie Foot . 4 be ; cs en "ee cy oe, pace be | ms a nS a > @.°3 % 4, t "gees, td " re tm, Le) ze B core " me on i ted een bose) tote, i hd. Sid, Thee iA NG: 2 OF 2028 Petiion under Section 751. { graying that in the circumstances slated im ihe affidavit Mled in support of the petition, the High Court may be mleased fo Drrect the Respondents not to interfere with the poseession, occupation of the Peifioner and the construction activity bemg undertaken by the Petitioner in schedule property admeasuring an extent of Ac. 12.51 cents in SyNo@ae of Endada -Vilage, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Pending disposal of WP No. GSO? of 2085, on the fle of fhe High Court The Pellion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affiidavil led in support thereot and the eariler order of the High Court dated $3.03.2025, 18.06.2085, 09.05. 2025, 20.12.2025, 27.07.2026 & 17.02 2026 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ajay Kumar Kenagarihy: Advocate for the Petlioner, and of GP for Revenue for the Respondents: WP NO: 6569 OF 2038 Hehveen: cs nas 6B Bs "ons of 23 x3 Ainampudi Nageswara Rao, Sioa Ayyanna, Aged about 68 HNe 77409 Koyavaripalemn, Enamadala, Guntur-o22018 Petitioner AND S. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by lis PriSecy, Department of Revenue, Secretarial, Velagabucl, Arnaravali, Guntur District & The District Collector of Visakhapainam, Vieakhapainam. 7. The Tahsidar, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapainam 8. Mis. Hayagreeva Farms " and Developers, Door No. 6-20-20/4, aan 4° Floor, Sukshetra - East Point, East Point Colony, fisakhapainam- O30017. Rep-by its Managing Pariner - Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying thal in the circumatances stated in the alidavit fled inerewith, fhe High Court may be pleased fo issue an appropriate wait or arder or direction more garticularly ir $ are mt he iy Xu g £ particn ver popee, a va cred fe 'gene Khene tod 7 ve £44 | Nper. 94 6a cat ta ¢% b Ae tft beoel rs £43 _ teee, 4 Roore ae "eee an, " z is) ah 3 on cca So gp YY €@ £ b & Bf mM as my BS me is gen we were on oo Lk og F ee 2 ¥ : oe he oA oe kee ite me kK o o % Sar e o ¢ ; "ene, ", 4 ts seed Si Xe a ge ee fo SHES yen test Ch gem se whe von eg "ey a be ye Bd Ps eo ge ey TE Ea "2 By < bet ED mG a f ened " om ran hee seine. oo i aed % Ls 3 " he 3 & me Be ew & @ ns ao a bon ry wor . ES, raat ae ED wg wr (OES 6 on bee m bees "i bon pene Sond sas a ante on oo SAA A Fy a Oa GS ar eg cons Sars e ea sy chee Bo cons 2 me oe OS nd ; wes wet 7, . ee S| me ¢ , Sh th Sane Soa "4 ° ibe ws, Sabine , ian C3 are, po oS Ct rm od a [6 nd ws 0 " when, Fa) bd ws ae 7, aaa £ ES a rod z vpeh eo ib con see bo, eee 3 8 ag oe ie as . ee te & 3 et, wt Posen" oo Fee RE ge RE, pe a SO oe FRO ED Ram FP OO by <3] x ON £% 48 ewe ay 1 wt we ad Teme Gm thy El ey ft. ay i io ee a os co a od ir how th ee op Bg wg a ees eed es Gs Code oy : te gene " Fea dood "ff aa $5 £ %) oe Py, - , - % heen, te a ape ¢ 5 it ae oe ' 4 ere fu} Sod 4% : im . 's i ie lode, ¢ "eee ni a3 Wee " cb fee Pas tee? e? ne , i) oy oo we vo gee " fess oad ee A Seer oo a a a SE oo BO ty ba 2 3 g h meee ¢ ay gre rs o% ae rAey vegan Se hon Pan Ma eG fet gas RR ty yn + | a fen Co UF wg » nn oe oO as ve & . oa oak "6 " gad "y Meee wot vated. g ge ale cy ps Cand tty a sf Pf a Some dase hes cx G Sho % m; speed 4 'eagle ° ot ap ter ee EE er iB Bw nn a nr: % we "3 my 2% vote oy 'pee Cs ay oy bere Gh % Ch fy * ee ro a = iA {ye me, i ne oy ONE "a st , Reese a seg " be Fh ay apa 4 g a i a Ss A a cr ay a & fy nee fe i aor ne bebe the rear! it 'ee +4 anon. 4 raed ronan Ape qn Ls i 'need ben done €f5 % reseed a . g re ee oon pases * Spe Te ES Oe 7 oes o bore " 43 "$4 ee ' yer pot "sf : 4 Pe a "a £ wy mT tf bel we A 5 : ppeess ot % : ay Pj heed ny = & @ Be Bye & ew my B BF 8 Be Cf toot Save % as as ¢ i ren] St nth 3 a Cs ge Eas i a 5 ie gy » 03 £ "Sy, fe ES, ey the ack a fee S&S @ & 8B Be & » G&G # Po TS ee ey po ste 33 tN "exe te Fa ar ns GS AM ray) . ag £3 Py Kee 3 tm wy 13 ee Z be aoe EX Pee SD . © a " 7 ae a we we oh. wy 8 ge eg vg: ee og # fag Son hh, bee £3 4 ay) a oheoe eee ' v " i wy «oO vom ne gene £% ad aod iggees oe ond "ee yok ots %, " yer oo i Oo Be oe a ey 2 gs : oF Be OL oak OO OG Ee 5 (Gad fed ie rns % s yo Sows ee aay 3 vo oy Bo rh ~ © 2 @ © 8 @ © te EE ey Cm F & bee , Bo Oo & 8 yy 8 . ; Da rege orooe , 4, 4 a " tatinne wee Vere ; veneer He Bw GC Be se 2 SB Oo BB we we & ee OE me ot em Ys. Gh Gh iy GEE 8 3 = & < 5 a ~ -- ws fan 12.04.2028. iS ¥ » Javvay Sar x we te ~ Rhee ee ed fhe earl % 3 > y 3 ring 4 & BN x "f Sk \ request of the learned Advocate General, | ~ s 3 a _ Atth COMMON ORDER
Te
Nb ao
SPONSORED
al aad
*
vod
wend,
sends
oR
eee
wad
on
ret anal.
interim order granted earlier by this Court is extended Hiilthen.
Sa/-U SRIDEVI
HTRUE COPY!) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
‘SECTION OFFICER
Ay
Two OCs tn GP for Revenue, High ¢ Court of Andhra Pradesh OUT 7
Twe CCs to Advocate General, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
Gre CC to Sr MRC nakravarthi, Advocate [OPUC]
One CC to Sri. Alay Rurar KS Snaparihl, Advocais fOPUC]
One GG to Sr. MRLK. Chakravarthy, Advocate [OFC
Two OCs to GP for Municipal Administration & Urban Development,
High Court of Andhra Pradesh. POUT]
One GC in Sr ASO Bose, Standing Counsel [OPUC]
. One CC fo Sr Somisetty Ganash Babu, Standing Counsal fOPUCT
One CC to Sri Kaleou Yashwanth, Advocate [OPUC]
One CC to Sri J. Dileep Kumar, Advocate, [(OPUC]
Sine OO to Sri Javvall Sarath Chandra, Advocate [OPUC)
One CO to Sri Srinivas Rao Bodduluri, Advocate, JOPUC)
Two CCGs to GP for Revenue, High Cour of AP POUT)
Two Os to Advocate General, High Court of Anchra Pradesh
One (C to Sr. Kalepu Yashwanth, Advocate [ORUC]
One CC to Sn Kaikala Rama Kireell, Advooate [OPUC]
ne CC in Mis Mandava Abhigna, Advocate [OPUC)
HIGH COURT
DATED: OSL RIL8
LIST ON 12.03.2026
ORDER
WP/SS07/2025, WP/8509/2025, WPY/S256/2025, WPvs309/2028,
WP/8332/2025, WP/B336/2025, WP/8337/2025, WPy/aaae/2028,
WP/8351/2025, WP/8985/2028, WP/8402/2025, WR/a4ne/2025.
WP/9109/2025, WPY9104/2028, WP79105/2026, WPYs108/2028.
WP/9110/2025, WP/O414/2025, WP/ot12/2025, WP?9119/2028,
WPI8114/2028, WP/9391/2025, WP/13621/2025, WP/14166/2028,
WP15026/2024, WPM69822024, WRN 7008/2024, WPI 7909/2024,
WPH7011/2024, WP/7023/2024, WP17194/2025, WP/19744/2024,
WP/9748/2024, WP/9748/2024, WPMSTS1/2024, WP/19782/2024,
WPHS753/2024, WPHS7SS/2024, WPNSTSEI2024, WP/9TS7/2024,
WPI19798/2024, WP/19804/2024, WPV9873/2024, WP/1 9878/2024.
WP/19881/2024, WPMS9S0/2024, WPNSes9/2024, WR/gssarzoza
INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED
; 3
SH HH