Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

Iranian President Raisi Speech Hacked: Legal Implications

Iranian President’s Speech Iran is facing high tension in its political arena. On Saturday, Prior to the Presidential address for the 44th anniversary of the Iranian...
HomeHigh CourtKerala High CourtV. K. Mohanan Nair vs State Of Kerala on 26 February, 2026

V. K. Mohanan Nair vs State Of Kerala on 26 February, 2026

Kerala High Court

V. K. Mohanan Nair vs State Of Kerala on 26 February, 2026

WP(C) NO. 1733 OF 2026
                                   1



                                                      2026:KER:18112

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI

   THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1947

                         WP(C) NO. 1733 OF 2026

PETITIONER:

          V. K. MOHANAN NAIR,
          AGED 72 YEARS
          S/O.KESAVAN NAIR, RESIDING AT DOOR NO. VIII/445,
          VAZHOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, VADAKKECHUZHIKUNNEL HOUSE,
          VAZHOOR KARA, VAZHOOR (P.O.), VAZHOOR VILLAGE,
          CHANGANACHERRY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KERALA,
          PIN - 686504


          BY ADVS.
          SRI.K.SHAJ
          SMT.BEENA N.KARTHA
          SRI.ARUN CHAND
          SHRI.BHARAT VIJAY P.
          SHRI.KEVIN JAMES
          SHRI.AKASH JOSHI
          SMT.MINU VITTORRIA PAULSON
          SMT.GOPIKA GOPAL
          SMT.ARCHANA P.P.
          SHRI.REN SHIBU
          SMT.SHEHROON PATEL A.K.
          SHRI.ISSAC MELVIN B.O.
          SHRI.ALVIN JOSEPH




RESPONDENTS:

    1     STATE OF KERALA,
          REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TAXES,
          GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

    2     THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION
          OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION,
 WP(C) NO. 1733 OF 2026
                                  2



                                                    2026:KER:18112

          VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695035

    3     THE SUB-REGISTRAR
          SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE,
          ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - 683572

    4     THE TAHSILDAR
          ALUVA, TALUK OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, ALUVA,
          ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - 683101

    5     THE VILLAGE OFFICER
          VILLAGE OFFICE, ANGAMALY VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK,
          ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - 683572

    6     THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR
          REVENUE RECOVERY, ALUVA TALUK OFFICE, MINI CIVIL
          STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - 683101

    7     THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER
          OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
          CORPORATE, 1ST FLOOR, C.R. BUILDING, I.S. PRESS ROAD,
          KOCHI, ERNAKULAM., PIN - 682031

    8     M/S. ATLASGOLD TOWNSHIP (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
          REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, HAVING ITS
          REGISTERED OFFICE AT 249A WARD XI, SHIVA NARAYANA
          TEMPLE, NSS JUNCTION, NEDUMBASSERY, NAYATHODE P.O.,
          ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - 683572



OTHER PRESENT:

          SRI. K. M. FAISAL, GP


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
26.02.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 1733 OF 2026
                                      3



                                                              2026:KER:18112


                                JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 26th day of February, 2026)

The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the

constitution of India.

2. The writ petition has been preferred by a person, who

had purchased an apartment from the 8 th respondent builder,

in an apartment complex by name ‘Atlas Celestial Park’,

through the purchase effected by Ext.P1 sale deed. The

petitioner obtained the said property of the apartment

together with a fraction of the undivided share in the land,

common areas and facilities. In the writ petition, the grievance

of the petitioner is essentially with regard to Ext.P3

Encumbrance Certificate that was issued to them where, apart

from the purchase of the apartment by the petitioner being

shown as an encumbrance to the property, subsequent

attachment effected at the instance of the revenue, as also at

the instance of the various creditors of the builder, have been

noted as encumbrances to the property purchased by the

petitioner. It is the specific case of the learned counsel for the

petitioner that the attachments made through the civil court
WP(C) NO. 1733 OF 2026
4

2026:KER:18112

have since been lifted and what remains now is the revenue

attachments consequent to the revenue recovery proceedings

initiated against the 8th respondent builder for default of tax

amounts. It is the case of the petitioner that these

attachments cannot be mentioned in an Encumbrance

Certificate pertaining to their property since none of the

liabilities shown through the entries point to an encumbrance

on their property.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

4. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of

the case and the submissions made across the Bar, I find force

in the contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner that

the encumbrances noted against the builder of the property

cannot find mention in the Encumbrance Certificate issued to

the petitioner, more so, when the petitioner is not defaulters in

respect of any tax. Any default occasioned by the builder,

subsequent to the sale of the apartment to the petitioner,

cannot prejudicially affect the petitioners’ proprietary rights

over the property in question.

WP(C) NO. 1733 OF 2026
5

2026:KER:18112

Accordingly, these writ petitions are allowed by quashing

Ext.P3 Encumbrance Certificate in all the writ petitions, and

directing the 3rd respondent to issue fresh Encumbrance

Certificates to the petitioner that do not reflect any of the

liabilities of the 8th respondent or any other person, incurred

subsequent to the date of purchase of the property by the

petitioner. The 3rd respondent shall, while issuing the fresh

Encumbrance Certificates, as directed, also make

consequential changes in the original records at the Sub

Registrar’s Office, Angamaly. The 3rd respondent shall do the

needful to comply with the directions in this judgment within a

period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment.

Sd/-

BASANT BALAJI,
JUDGE
saap
WP(C) NO. 1733 OF 2026
6

2026:KER:18112

APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 1733 OF 2026

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.

4050/ǀ/2012 DATED 20/09/2012 OF ANGAMALY SRO.
Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.

KL07041615261/2025 OF PROPERTY TAX PAID DATED
19/12/2025 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.

Exhibit P2(a) THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.

KL07041615262/2025 OF PROPERTY TAX PAID DATED
19/12/2025 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.

Exhibit P2(b) THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.

KL07041615269/2025 OF PROPERTY TAX PAID DATED
20/12/2025 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.

Exhibit P3                  THE TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE
                            WITH    APPLICATION     NO.    13573/25     DATED
                            04/12/2025    ISSUED    BY   THE     REGISTRATION
                            DEPARTMENT TO THE PETITIONER.
Exhibit P4                  THE TRUE COPY OF COMMON JUDGMENT DATED

20/11/2019 IN W.P.(C). NO.22350/2019 & OTHER
CONNECTED CASES OF THIS HON’BLE COURT.
//True copy//PA to Judge



Source link