Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

LEGAL FRAMEWORKS FOR REFUGEE PROTECTION

Abstract The worldwide refugee population creates multiple difficulties which require both effective and compassionate policy solutions. India maintains its dedication to humanitarian values while...
HomeHigh CourtAndhra Pradesh High Court - AmravatiUnknown vs ) Whether The Compensation Fixed By The ... on 3...

Unknown vs ) Whether The Compensation Fixed By The … on 3 March, 2026

(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Hari Haranadha Sarma)

Introductory:-

[i] These Appeals are filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition

Act, 1894 [for short ‘the Act’ ] and directed against the orders dated 28.02.2013

passed in LAOP No.23 of 2005 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nuzvid.

[ii] The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.) and Land Acquisition Officer,

Vijayawada, who made reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act,

1894 is the appellant in LAAS No.347 of 2013 and the appeal in LAAS No.325 of

2018 is filed by the claimant /Patapanchula Narasimha Rao.

2. Questioning the compensation fixed as excessive, the Referring Officer

has filed the appeal, whereas questioning the compensation awarded as

inadequate and insufficient, the claimant has filed the appeal.



Source link