Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

Co jest ImpulsPress – Law Pulse

Impuls.press nie stara się krzyczeć nagłówkami ani walczyć z algorytmami o moment uwagi. To portal, do którego się wchodzi z ciekawości, a zostaje...
HomeHigh CourtHimachal Pradesh High CourtTilak Raj vs . Roshan Lal on 20 February, 2026

Tilak Raj vs . Roshan Lal on 20 February, 2026

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Tilak Raj vs . Roshan Lal on 20 February, 2026

Tilak Raj vs. Roshan Lal

.

Cr.R No.107 of 2026

20.02.2026 Present: Mr. Gurdev Negi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Cr.R No.107/2026

Notice be issued to the respondent, returnable by

of
the next date of hearing, on taking steps during the course of

the day.

                     rt    List on 24.03.2026.

                           Cr.MP No.568/2026

                           Notice in the aforesaid terms.

                           By     way     of     present       application,        the



applicant/petitioner has prayed for suspension of substantive

sentence imposed upon him vide judgment of conviction and

order of sentence dated 04.03.2024, passed by the learned

Judicial Magistrate First Class, Karsog, District Mandi, H.P in

Criminal Complaint Registration No.6/2019, titled as “Roshan

Lal Vs. Tilak Raj”, which was affirmed by learned Additional

Sessions Judge-I, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P., in Cr. Appeal

No.227 of 2024 titled “Tilak Raj vs. Roshan Lal” on

28.11.2025, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments

Act. The learned trial Court vide judgment of conviction and

order of sentence dated 04.03.2024, convicted and sentenced

him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three

months and to pay fine of Rs.1,60,000/- for the commission of

an offence punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act.

The respondent/non-applicant had filed a complaint

under Section 138 of NI Act, in the Court of learned Judicial

::: Downloaded on – 20/02/2026 20:32:59 :::CIS
Magistrate, First Class, Karsog, District Mandi, H.P on

.

03.01.2019. That the present petitioner was dealing in the

business of Fruit as a Commission Agent at Chattri, District

Mandi and the respondent had supplied apple boxes to the

petitioner on 22.08.2018 worth Rs.1,40,600/- vide sale voucher

of counterfoil book No.023. It was averred that in order to

of
discharge his liability, the petitioner had issued a post dated

cheque bearing No.100865 dated 29.08.2018 amounting to
rt
Rs.1,40,000/- pertaining to PNB Branch Jajehali. When the said

cheque was presented for encashment, the same was

dishonoured for “insufficiency of funds”. The complaint filed by

the respondent was allowed by the learned Judicial Magistrate,

First Class, Karsog, District Mandi, vide judgment dated

04.03.2024 and convicted the applicant and ordered that he

shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months

and pay a fine of Rs.1,60,000/-. The said judgment was

affirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Mandi,

District Mandi, H.P., in Cr. Appeal No.227 of 2024 titled “Tilak

Raj vs. Roshan Lal” on 28.11.2025.

Perusal of the revision shows that the applicant has

raised arguable points and the disposal of the revision shall

take some time. Consequently, during the pendency of the

present petition, the judgment of conviction and order of

sentence as passed by the learned trial Court on 04.03.2024,

which was affirmed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I,

Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. on 28.11.2025, is ordered to be

suspended, during the pendency of the revision, subject to the

following conditions:

::: Downloaded on – 20/02/2026 20:32:59 :::CIS

(i) That the applicant/petitioner shall furnish personal
bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-, along with one surety

.

of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned

trial Court, within a period of four weeks from today,
with an undertaking that he will surrender before the
learned trial Court to serve the remainder substantive

sentence, in case of ultimate dismissal of the present
revision, by this Court;

(ii) That the applicant/petitioner shall deposit 30% of

of
the total amount of compensation, which has been
referred to by the learned trial Court as fine, with the
learned trial Court, within a period of eight weeks from
today, which shall be in addition to the amount, if not,
rt
already deposited by the applicant.

(iii) The applicant/petitioner shall not leave the territory
of India without the prior permission of the Court.

A copy of this order be sent to the learned trial Court,

with a direction that the report of compliance of this order be

submitted to this Court, on or before the next date of hearing.

List the matter on 24.03.2026.

( Romesh Verma )
Vacation Judge
February 20, 2026
(Ritu)

::: Downloaded on – 20/02/2026 20:32:59 :::CIS



Source link