“C.R.”
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
The present appeal arises out of the judgment dated 28.03.2025
passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in WP (C) No. 9196/2023.
By the judgment under challenge, the learned Single Judge, while
allowing the writ petition, quashed the notices issued by the first
respondent therein, namely the Regional Labour Commissioner
(Central) (for short, “RLC”), calling upon the petitioners to participate in
conciliation proceedings instituted under Section 22 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, “ID Act”).
2. The notice impugned in the writ proceedings had restrained
the respondent writ petitioner (for short, “RWP”) from proceeding with
the call for strike/abstention from work issued in relation to the
employees/officers employed with the appellant Bank.