AIRRNEWS

Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

ROLE OF GATEKEEPERS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

ABSTRACT One of the key ingredients for the success of a business of any size is corporate governance. Basically, Corporate Governance is an...
HomeHigh CourtPatna High CourtTejbali Singh vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 22 July,...

Tejbali Singh vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 22 July, 2025

Patna High Court

Tejbali Singh vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 22 July, 2025

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11300 of 2017
       ======================================================
       Tejbali Singh Son of late Ram Lakhan Singh Resident of Village- Salthua,
       Police Station- Kudra, District- Kaimur, Proprietor of Hanuman Industry
       Salthua, Kudra, Kaimur at Bhabua.

                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                          Versus
  1.   The State Of Bihar and Ors
  2.   The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary of Bihar State Food and
       Civil Supply Department,
  3.   The District Magistrate, Kaimur.
  4.   The Director -Cum-Certificate Officer, Kaimur, Bhabua.
  5.   The District Manager, State Food Corporation, Kaimur.

                                                 ... ... Respondent/s
       ======================================================
       Appearance :
       For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, Adv.
       For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Arvind Ujjwal-SC-4
                                     Mr. Shailendra Kr. Singh, Adv.
                                     Mr. Utkarsh Utpal, Adv.
       ======================================================
       CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

                              ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 22-07-2025

1. The petitioner has filed the Writ petition for

the following reliefs:

(a) For quashing the entire
proceeding of Certificate Case No. 185 of
2014-2015 running in the Court of
Certificate Officer, Kaimur against the
petitioner for recovery of a sum of Rs.
10,20,021.40 (Ten Lakhs Twenty Thousand
Twenty one rupees and paisa forty only)
alleging therein that the petitioner has
Patna High Court CWJC No.11300 of 2017 dt.22-07-2025
2/4

taken 2000/-(two thousand) quintals of
paddy from State Food Corporation, Kaimur
for milling and he was to deposit 1340
quintals of rice whereas he has deposited
only 810 quintals of rice and 530 quintals of
rice was left with the petitioner costing to
amount of Rs. 10,08,658.90 (Ten Lakhs
eight Thousand Six Hundred fifty eight
rupees and paisa ninety only) and also for
quashing the notice cum letter no. 531
dated 18.03.2017 (contained in Annexure-3)
issued by the Respondent no. 5 whereby
the petitioner has been asked to deposit a
bank guarantee equivalent to Rs.

10,08,658.90 (Ten Lakhs eight Thousand Six
Hundred fifty eight rupees and paisa ninety
only) by 28.03.2017 in the District office of
State Food Corporation, Kaimur holding that
Bank security has not been deposited by
the petitioner whereas the security money
as as already deposited per agreement.

(b) To pass any such other order or
orders as the Hon’ble Court be deem just
and proper in the facts and circumstances
of the case.

2. At the outset, the Learned counsel for the

petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court to grant liberty
Patna High Court CWJC No.11300 of 2017 dt.22-07-2025
3/4

to file fresh objections under Section 9 of the Bihar and

Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 and direct the

authority to pass necessary orders duly taking into

account the objections filed by the petitioner.

3. The Learned counsel for the respondents

submitted that he has no objection, if a direction is given

to the concerned authority to pass necessary orders

under Section 10 of the Act, duly taking into account the

objections filed by the petitioner.

4. Having regard to the above made submissions,

without going into the merits or demerits of the case, the

present writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the

petitioner to file objections under Section 9 before the

concerned authority, within a period of one month from

the date of receipt of this order. On such objections being

filed, the authority concerned shall pass necessary orders

under Section 10 of the Act.

5. It is needless to mention that before passing

any order, the authority concerned shall give an

opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Any order passed

shall be communicated to the petitioner. The entire

exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible
Patna High Court CWJC No.11300 of 2017 dt.22-07-2025
4/4

preferably within a period of three months from the date

of filing of the objections by the petitioner.

6. Till the passing of the final order by the

Certificate Officer, it is directed that no coercive steps

shall be taken against the petitioner herein.

7. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand

disposed of.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
Manish/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date          24.07.2025
Transmission Date
 



Source link