― Advertisement ―

CPUH Journal of Research in Social Sciences 2026

About the Journal The CPUH Journal of Research in Social Sciences is an international, double-blind peer- reviewed online journal published by Career Point University,...
HomeTanuja Bibi vs The State Of Jharkhand ... Opposite ... on 13...

Tanuja Bibi vs The State Of Jharkhand … Opposite … on 13 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Jharkhand High Court

Tanuja Bibi vs The State Of Jharkhand … Opposite … on 13 April, 2026

Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

                                                                           ( 2026:JHHC:10530 )




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                            A.B.A. No. 1538 of 2026
            Tanuja Bibi, aged about 27 years, wife of Jamshed Ansari, resident of
            Patharghatia, Gram- Jargari, P.O. Dubrajpur, P.S. Palojori, District- Deoghar,
            Jharkhand                                               ... Petitioner
                                        -Versus-
            The State of Jharkhand                                  ... Opposite Party
                                             -----

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

—–

SPONSORED

For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, A.P.P.

—–

02/13.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel

appearing for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Palajori

P.S. Case No.110/2023, registered for the offence under Sections 302, 34 of

the I.P.C., pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1 st Class,

Madhupur.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the husband

of this petitioner, against whom the main allegation is made, has faced the

trial and he has been acquitted vide judgment dated 25.07.2025 passed in

S.T. No.163 of 2024. He further submits that another co-accused, in the

similar situation, has been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No.3101 of 2024.

He then submits that the petitioner has earlier moved before this Court in

A.B.A. No.7424 of 2024 which was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated

23.06.2025, however, on the fresh ground this anticipatory bail application

has been preferred.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and

submits that the petitioner is also one of the accused in the said case.

( 2026:JHHC:10530 )

5. Considering that the main accused has faced the trial and he has been

acquitted vide judgment dated 25.07.2025 passed in S.T. No.163 of 2024 and

the co-accused in similar situation, has also been granted anticipatory bail in

the aforesaid A.B.A. and it is well-settled that on the fresh ground, second

anticipatory bail application can be entertained and in that view of the matter,

the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two

weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such

terms and conditions as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.

6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of.

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Dated: 13th April, 2026
Ajay/



Source link