The Supreme Court of India has reaffirmed that neither private individuals nor public officials can use speeches, artistic works, films, cartoons or other forms of expression to demean or stigmatise any community on the basis of religion, caste, language or region.
The observations were made by a Bench led by Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, which stressed that the Constitution envisions a society built on fraternity and mutual respect. The Court noted that preserving harmony among diverse groups is not optional but flows directly from constitutional values, including those reflected in the Preamble and fundamental duties.
The remarks came while the Court was dealing with a plea concerning the title of a film that allegedly cast a particular community in a negative light. Although the dispute was resolved after the filmmakers agreed to modify the title, the Bench took the opportunity to clarify the broader legal position on freedom of expression and its limits.
While acknowledging that creative and political speech is protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, the Court emphasised that this freedom is subject to reasonable restrictions. Expression, it observed, cannot be a shield for content that undermines the dignity of entire communities.
Importantly, the Bench underscored that ministers and holders of constitutional office carry a greater responsibility. Having sworn to uphold the Constitution, they must refrain from making statements that single out or disparage any section of society.
The ruling reinforces the principle that constitutional freedoms must operate alongside the values of equality, dignity and social cohesion in a plural democracy.
