Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

Mergers Acquisitions and Regulatory – Legal Research and Analysis

ABSTRACT The article will discuss how the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) deal boom in the Indian banking and fintech sectors is transforming competition in...
HomeDistrict CourtsBangalore District CourtSonu Marketring Pvt Ltd vs Gagan Kestur Shivanad on 23 February, 2026

Sonu Marketring Pvt Ltd vs Gagan Kestur Shivanad on 23 February, 2026


The complainant filed the complaint under Section 223

Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) against the

accused for the offence punishable under Section 138

Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. The brief case of the complainant is as under:

That the complainant is a private limited company

incorporated under Companies Act and a Non Banking

Financial Institution and registered with RBI providing personal

loans, and doing other non banking transactions. That on

C.C.No.37123/2024

26.01.2024, at the request of accused being the loan applicant

and his wife Akshitha Hanumanthapura Shivanna as a Co

applicant, the complainant has sanctioned personal loan to the

accused to an extent of Rs.2,00,000/- vide loan A/c

No.100110300100065. That while availing said loan, the

accused and the co applicant agreed to repay the same in 24

monthly installments of Rs.20,000/- and also agreed to pay

varied rate of interest and other incidental charges to the

complainant. It is pleaded that both were irregular in making

the repayment and that the loan account was showing an

outstanding balance of Rs.2,06,771- as on 06.05.2024. It is

stated that on regular follow up, the accused issued a cheque

bearing No.936011 dated 06.05.2024 for Rs.2,06,771/- drawn

on Karnataka Bank, Sanjaynagar branch, Bangalore towards

payment of outstanding due amount. It is pleaded that the

complainant has presented said cheque through his banker i.e.

ICICI Bank, BTM 2nd stage, Bengaluru and said cheque returned

dishonored on 07.05.2024 for the reason “Funds Insufficient “.



Source link