Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

HomeHigh CourtRajasthan High CourtSmt. Lachhi Devi Memorial Jan Kalyan ... vs State Of Rajasthan on...

Smt. Lachhi Devi Memorial Jan Kalyan … vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 March, 2026


Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Smt. Lachhi Devi Memorial Jan Kalyan … vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 March, 2026

[2026:RJ-JD:10827]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                     S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 847/2026

 1.      Smt. Lachhi Devi Memorial Jan Kalyan Karya Sansthan,
         Jodhpur, Having Its Registered Office At Moti Bhawan, 3-
         W-6, Kudi Housing Board, Jodhpur, Through Its Principal,
         Rampraksh S/o Jeeyaram Aged About 60 Years, R/o
         Bhavi, Tehsil Bilara, District Jodhpur (Raj.).
 2.      Smt. Moti Memorial Mahavidhyalay, Situated At Arya
         Samaj Bhawan, Near Talaab Bhavi, Tehsil Bilara, District
         Jodhpur, Through Its Secretary Rampraksh S/o Jeeyaram
         Aged About 60 Years, R/o Bhavi, Tehsil Bilara, District
         Jodhpur (Raj.).
                                                                        ----Petitioners
                                        Versus
 1.      State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Higher
         Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
         (Raj.).
 2.      The Commissioner, College Education, Government Of
         Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).
 3.      Joint     Director       (Private     Institution)          Block-4,   Shiksha
         Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur (Raj.).
 4.      Deputy Director, College Education, Jaipur (Raj.).
                                                                      ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)             :     Ms. Kamini Joshi
                                    Mr. Devesh A. Purohit
                                    Mr. Yash Tripathi
For Respondent(s)             :     Mr. Milap Chopra, DGC



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Order

05/03/2026

1. Learned counsel for the parties have jointly shown the order

passed by the Division Bench at Jaipur of this Hon’ble Court in the

matter of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Gurukul Institution of

(Uploaded on 05/03/2026 at 04:50:05 PM)
(Downloaded on 05/03/2026 at 08:33:58 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:10827] (2 of 4) [CW-847/2026]

Education & Anr. (D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.631/2022)

alongwith other connected matters on 31.01.2023, which reads as

follows:

“D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.
824/2022 has been filed beyond the period of
limitation and, therefore, application seeking
condonation of delay in filing of the aforesaid
appeal has also been filed.

Considering that in the similar appeals
having already been filed, the issue is being
examined by this Court, the delay in filing of the
aforesaid appeal is condoned. Application seeking
condonation of delay in filing of the aforesaid
appeal is allowed.

Applications for appropriate directions have
been filed in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) Nos.
631/2022, 526/2022, 782/2022 and 940/2022.

The prayer made in the aforesaid
applications is that even though the order has
been passed by the learned Single Judge in favour
of the respondents private educational
institutions, NOC is not being issued by the State
authorities/Commissioner, Higher Education,
insisting for payment of fine amount under
Circular dated 03.06.2019 read with order dated
19.07.2022.

Learned counsels for the respondents would
submit that the appeals are pending consideration
before this Court and the respondents are
prepared to give undertaking that in the event,
the appeal is decided against them, they shall pay
the amount as demanded by the State authorities.

Learned counsel for the State would submit
that the order passed by the learned Single Judge
has been challenged in these appeals filed by the
State and interim orders have also been passed in
favour of the State on prima facie consideration
that the Commissioner, Higher Education had the
authority under the law to issue direction which
was impugned in the writ petitions. He would
further submit that if the institutions do not
deposit the amount and the students enrolled with
those institutions are allowed to appear in
examinations by way of grant of NOC, the

(Uploaded on 05/03/2026 at 04:50:05 PM)
(Downloaded on 05/03/2026 at 08:33:58 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:10827] (3 of 4) [CW-847/2026]

institutions, at a later stage, may avoid discharge
of their obligation in the event of appeals being
allowed.

Taking into consideration the submissions of
learned counsels for the respective parties and
further that the issue with regard to the authority
of the Commissioner, College Education is under
consideration in these appeals and further taking
into consideration that unless NOC is issued by
the State authorities, the students enrolled with
respondents institutions may not appear in the
forthcoming examinations and also that the
respondents institutions are prepared to give
undertaking, we are inclined to issue a direction
that the appellants shall provide NOC to the
respondents-institutions upon furnishing
undertaking that in the event any adverse order is
passed against them, the entire amount
demanded from them shall be deposited in the
office of the Commissioner, College Education.
The said undertaking shall also be treated as
undertaking given before this Court in the matters
where aforesaid applications have been filed.

It goes without saying that once NOC is
granted by the State upon submission of
undertaking by the institutions/colleges
concerned, the University would admit the
students of those institutions/colleges for
examinations. Aforesaid applications are,
accordingly, disposed off.

List these matters after four weeks.
Interim orders earlier passed in the appeals
shall continue subject to the directions as
aforesaid.”

2. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the

present petition may be disposed of subject to the final disposal of

the special appeal, on the same conditions, which have been

imposed by the Hon’ble Division Bench in the case of State of

Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Gurukul Institution of Education & Anr.

(supra).

(Uploaded on 05/03/2026 at 04:50:05 PM)
(Downloaded on 05/03/2026 at 08:33:58 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:10827] (4 of 4) [CW-847/2026]

3. The proposition made is justified, the aforesaid directions

issued by the Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court shall apply on

both the parties and the final outcome shall accordingly hold the

field for the purpose of final determination of the dispute.

4. In view of the above, the instant petitions are disposed of. All

pending applications also stand disposed of.

(SANJEET PUROHIT),J
32-shashikant/-

(Uploaded on 05/03/2026 at 04:50:05 PM)
(Downloaded on 05/03/2026 at 08:33:58 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Source link