Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Sk. Suraj Ali & Anr vs Unknown on 10 July, 2025
Author: Jay Sengupta
Bench: Jay Sengupta
10.07.2025
Sl. No.27
Ct. 28
NB
C.R.M. (A) 1760 of 2025
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482 of
the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with
Debra PS Case No.134/2025 dated 18.02.2025, under Sections
126(2)/115(1)/118(1)/76/89/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
And
In the matter of : Sk. Suraj Ali & Anr. … petitioners
Md. Wasim Akram.
…for the petitioner.
Ms. Baisali Basu
…for the State.
Heard the learned counsels for the parties.
Perused the case diary.
The prime allegations in this case are that the petitioners and
others physically assaulted the de facto complainant/lady and
caused termination of her pregnancy and also sexually assaulted
her minor daughter.
Considering the serious nature of allegations and the
incriminating materials available in the case diary including the
injury report, the bed-head ticket of the de facto complainant and
the statements of the de facto complainant and her minor daughter
recorded before the learned Magistrate, I do not consider this to be
a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
The application for anticipatory bail being C.R.M. (A) 1760 of
2025 is, thus, rejected.
2
Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered
to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon
compliance of all formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)