Advertisement
Advertisement

― Advertisement ―

JOB OPPORTUNITY AT VIDHI CENTRE FOR LEGAL POLICY

About the OrganisationVidhi Centre for Legal Policy is a leading independent legal think tank in India, working on law reform, public policy, and...
HomeShankar Prasad Agrawalla vs Bank Of Baroda on 6 April, 2026

Shankar Prasad Agrawalla vs Bank Of Baroda on 6 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Orissa High Court

Shankar Prasad Agrawalla vs Bank Of Baroda on 6 April, 2026

Author: Chittaranjan Dash

Bench: Chittaranjan Dash

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                             WP(C) No.9722 of 2026

            Shankar Prasad Agrawalla         ....                          Petitioner
                                                              Represented by Adv.-
                                                              Mr. A. Kejriwal, Adv.
                                                               Mr. A. Mishra, Adv.
                                            -versus-
            Bank of Baroda, Chief            ....                        Respondents
            Manager and Authorised                           Represented by Adv.-
            Officer, Regional Office,             Mr. Gurudutta Kar, Adv. for Bank
            Sambalpur & Anr.

            CORAM:
                         JUSTICE KRISHNA SHRIPAD DIXIT
                         JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
                                         ORDER

06.04.2026

WP(C) No.9722 of 2026
&
I.A. No.5870 of 2026
Order No.

SPONSORED

01. The borrower is before the Writ Court for laying a challenge
to the auction scheduled to be held today. Firstly, the amount is not
that big, it is only ₹11,92,000/- (Eleven Lakh Ninety-Two
Thousand) only. Secondly, the borrower is showing bona fide by
offering to pay ₹1,50,000/-( Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand) only
this day itself and another like sum within ten (10) days reckoned
from today. He is also expressing willingness to settle the
outstanding, if reasonable instalments are given. This offer appears
to be reasonable and the Bank being an instrumentality of State
under Article 12 in the light of Gujarat State Financial
Corporation v. Lotus Hotels Pvt. Ltd.
, AIR 1983 SC 848, cannot
Page 1 of 2
direct like a private money lender. The financial difficulties come
and go in the lives of all.

In the above circumstances, issue emergent notice. Learned
Panel Counsel is requested to accept notice for the Opposite Parties.
Required number of copies of the Writ Petition along with all
documents be served on him within three working days.
Application in I.A. No.5870 of 2026 supported by affidavit having
been favoured, reprieve is granted to the Petitioner as under:

Stay of the scheduled auction today subject to Petitioner
paying ₹1,50,000/-(Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand) only before
2:00 P.M. this day and also paying a like sum within ten (10) days
reckoned from this day, failing which not only the reprieve stands
rescinded but petition runs the risk of dismissal on that ground itself.

3. Post after ten (10) days, in the meanwhile, Bank may file its
Counter.

Web copy of order to be acted upon by all concerned.

(Krishna Shripad Dixit)
Judge

(Chittaranjan Dash)
Signature Not Verified Judge
Digitally Signed
Signed by: PRASANT KUMAR SAHOO
Reason: Authentication
Location: Orissa High Court
Date: 06-Apr-2026 13:27:37
Prasant

Page 2 of 2



Source link