Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

India, UK & USA Compared

ABSTRACT This paper examines the critical interplay between judicial independence, judicial activism, and judicial accountability in three major democratic jurisdictions: India, the United Kingdom,...
HomeHigh CourtPatna High CourtShambhu Kahar vs The State Of Bihar Through Chief ... on 23...

Shambhu Kahar vs The State Of Bihar Through Chief … on 23 February, 2026

Patna High Court

Shambhu Kahar vs The State Of Bihar Through Chief … on 23 February, 2026

Author: Arun Kumar Jha

Bench: Arun Kumar Jha

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1377 of 2022
             Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2002 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas
     ======================================================
     Shambhu Kahar, S/o Akashat Kahar @ Achhat Kahar, Resident of village-
     Pipra, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas
                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                          Versus
1.    The State of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar Patna. Bihar
2.   The Union of India Through Home Secretary, New Delhi. Bihar
3.   The State Sentence Remission Board Through the Principal Secretary, Dept.
     of Home, Govt. of Bihar Patna Bihar
4.   The Joint Sect. Cum Director (Administration), Home Dept. (Prison), Bihar,
     Patna Bihar
5.   The Secretary, Law Dept., Govt. of Bihar, Patna Bihar
6.   The Additional Director General of Police, Criminal Investigation Dept.,
     Bihar, Patna Bihar
7.   The Inspector General, Jail and Reforms Services, Bihar, Patna Bihar
8.   The Assistant Inspector General Jail and Reforms Services, Bihar, Patna
     Bihar
9.    The Jail Superintendent, Sasaram Jail, Sasaram, Rohtas Bihar
                                                              ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate
                                       Mr. Rakesh Narayan Singh, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s     :        None.
     ======================================================
        CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                         ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 23-02-2026

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

02. However, there is no representation on behalf of the

State-respondents.

03. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition

seeking direction to the respondent no.3/State Sentence

Remission Board/ (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Board’) to

consider the case of the petitioner for his premature release by
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1377 of 2022 dt.23-02-2026
2/3

extending the benefit of remission on the ground that he has

already completed the qualifying period of incarceration

entitling him of such benefit.

04. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that the petitioner has been convicted for the offence under

Sections 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of

the Arms Act after facing trial, vide Sessions Trial No. 412 of

2002, arising out of Nokha P.S. Case No. 13 of 2002, by the

learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-1, Rohtas at Sasaram,

vide judgment of conviction dated 28.06.2006 and has been

sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life with fine

vide order of sentence dated 03.07.2006. Being aggrieved by the

aforesaid judgment and order, the petitioner filed Cr. Appeal

(DB) No. 705 of 2006 before this Court, which upheld and

confirmed the judgment and order of the learned trial court vide

judgment dated 23.11.2012. The learned counsel further submits

that the petitioner has already completed for more than 14 years

of his actual incarceration and more than 20 years with

remission.

05. Though there is no representation on behalf of the

State-respondents, but the counter affidavit filed on behalf of

respondent nos.3, 4, 7, 8 & 9 is on record wherein it has been
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1377 of 2022 dt.23-02-2026
3/3

admitted that the petitioner has completed 14 years of his actual

custody and 20 years of custody with remission on 30.09.2022

and it has also been submitted that the proposal of the petitioner

for premature release would be put up in the next meeting of the

Board for consideration.

06. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that so far as his instruction, the matter has not been put

up before the Board till date.

07. In the light of the aforementioned facts and

circumstances, the concerned respondent authorities are directed

to place the matter of the petitioner before the Board within a

period of four weeks after obtaining necessary reports from the

statutory authorities, if required. Thereafter, appropriate

decision in the matter of the petitioner be taken by the Board in

accordance with law within a period of next four weeks.

08. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the

present writ petition stands disposed of.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
V.K.Pandey/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          23.02.2026
Transmission Date       23.02.2026
 



Source link