Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

Hogan Lovells represents the Republic of Ecuador on US$500 million housing financing facility

Houston, Miami – Global law firm Hogan Lovells has represented the Republic of Ecuador in connection with the “International Housing Financing in Ecuador”...
HomeHigh CourtRajasthan High Court - JaipurSatyam Agarwal S/O Shyamswaroop ... vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jp:8883) on 26...

Satyam Agarwal S/O Shyamswaroop … vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jp:8883) on 26 February, 2026


Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Satyam Agarwal S/O Shyamswaroop … vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jp:8883) on 26 February, 2026

                                   [2026:RJ-JP:8883]

                                           HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                                                       BENCH AT JAIPUR

                                           S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2462/2021

                                   Satyam Agarwal S/o Shyamswaroop Agarwal, aged about 46
                                   Years, R/o Agrasen Bazar, Old Dhanmandi, Kota.
                                                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                                                      Versus
                                   1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
                                   2.       Joti W/o Vikas Banjara, aged about 25 Years, R/o Khai
                                            Road, Nayapura Kota City.
                                                                                                   ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Yadav for
Dr. Mahesh Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP
Ms. Nidhi Upman

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

Order

26/02/2026

1. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the report dated

26.02.2026 sent by SHO, P.S. Kotwali, District Kota, wherein, it is

mentioned that the charge-sheet has already been filed against

the petitioner.

2. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner also

submits that he does not want to press the present petition as the

matter has become infructuous.

3. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as

having become infructuous.

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

PUNEET KUMAR /22

(Uploaded on 05/03/2026 at 03:18:10 PM)
(Downloaded on 05/03/2026 at 04:23:14 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Source link