No menu items!
No menu items!

Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

HomeRobin Kumar & Anr. vs . State & Ors. on 7 March,...

Robin Kumar & Anr. vs . State & Ors. on 7 March, 2026

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Robin Kumar & Anr. vs . State & Ors. on 7 March, 2026

Author: Sandeep Sharma

Bench: Sandeep Sharma

.

Robin Kumar & Anr. Vs. State & Ors.

CWP No. 11078/2011 a/w CWP No. 4105/2012 & CWP
No.480/2013

of
CWP No.11078/2021

07.03.2026 Present: Mr. Rakesh Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioners.

rt
Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan Deputy
Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant

Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2.

Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Nitin
Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

CWP No.4105/2012

Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek

Verma, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Vijay K. Arora, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gourav and Ms.
Ashtha Kohli, Advocates, for respondents No.2 & 3.

Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan Deputy
Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant
Advocate General, for respondents No. 4 & 5.

Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Nitin
Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No. 6 & 7.

CWP No. 480/2013

Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek
Verma, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Vijay K. Arora, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gourav and Ms.
Ashtha Kohli, Advocates, for respondents No.2 & 3.

Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional
Advocates General with Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan Deputy
Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant

::: Downloaded on – 07/03/2026 20:30:01 :::CIS
.

Advocate General, for respondents No. 4 & 5.

Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Nitin
Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No. 6 & 7.

Head. Grievance of the petitioners, as highlighted by the

of
learned Senior Advocate, is against the development fund

charge ordered to be collected by the respondents-Technical
rt
University from the institutions, which in turn is being collected

by the institutions (petitioners) from the students.

Learned counsel on the opposite side, more particularly

for the respondents-Technical University as well as the

respondents-State, seek time to obtain the latest instructions

in this regard. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned for the day.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge
7th March, 2026 (Rohit)

::: Downloaded on – 07/03/2026 20:30:01 :::CIS



Source link