Registrar General, vs . State Of Meghalaya & Ors on 28 April, 2026

    0
    37
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Meghalaya High Court

    Registrar General, vs . State Of Meghalaya & Ors on 28 April, 2026

    Author: H.S. Thangkhiew

    Bench: H.S. Thangkhiew

    Serial No.01
    Daily List
                           HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
                                  AT SHILLONG
    
      PIL No.4/2026
                                                 Date of Order: 28.04.2026
      Registrar General,          Vs.        State of Meghalaya & ors
      High Court of Meghalaya
      Coram:
            Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice
            Hon'ble Mr. H.S. Thangkhiew, Judge
      Appearance:
      For the Petitioner :         -
      For the Respondents :        Mr. A. Kumar, Advocate General with

    Ms. R. Colney, GA
    Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with
    Ms. K. Gurung, Adv

    i) Whether approved for reporting in No
    Law journals etc.:

    SPONSORED
      ii)    Whether approved for publication
             in press:                                 Yes
    
    

    Pursuant to the order dated 21st April, 2026, Mr. Kumar,

    learned Advocate General has tendered a status report on behalf of

    the respondent-State and the same is taken on record. The said

    report is signed by the Commissioner of Transport, Government of

    Meghalaya, Shillong. Paragraph 10 of the said report reads thus:

    “10. That it is pertinent to note that between the period from
    April 2025 to February 2026, a total of 2,030 vehicles have
    transported a quantity of 25,902 MT of minor minerals,
    Page 1 of 4
    indicating that an average of less than 7 (seven) vehicles per
    day crossed the roads for transportation in Jaintia Hills
    Territorial Division (covering the Amlarem/West Jaintia Hills
    portion of the route).”

    2. The aforesaid statement made by the Commissioner of

    Transport in the said status report is completely contrary to the

    chart annexed by the Commissioner at page 29. When the

    Advocate General was confronted with the said discrepancy, he

    sought time to take instructions. Prima facie, it appears that there

    is an attempt to mislead the Court with respect to the aforesaid

    data, which is mentioned in paragraph 10 of the said report vis-à-

    vis the chart annexed as annexure-6 at page 26. It also appears

    from the said status report, in particular page 49 of the said status

    report, that certain vehicles were found violating provisions of

    Sections 192, 190(2) and 179 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and

    that the said vehicles have been fined and offences compounded. It

    also appears that no prosecution has been lodged against any of

    the vehicles, who were found violating the law, between the period

    22nd April, 2026 and 25th April, 2026. Atleast, the affidavit nor any

    document reveal the same. There is no data submitted with

    Page 2 of 4
    respect to whether the said vehicles that were fined were first-time

    offenders/repeat offenders. Learned Advocate General to inform

    this Court whether there is a data bank of registered vehicles with

    the Transport Department; whether there is any data maintained

    with respect to the fines imposed in the data system, so as to know

    whether the vehicles are first-time offenders/repeat offenders.

    3. At this stage, learned Advocate General seeks time to file

    affidavit-in-replies of the respective departments. The affidavits to

    be filed in the Registry on or before 4th May, 2026.

    4. Dr. Mozika, learned DGSI has also tendered a status report

    on behalf of the BSF in compliance with the order dated 21 st April,

    2026. The said status report is also taken on record. In paragraph

    10 of the said status report, it is stated as under:

    “10. It is submitted that the main task of BSF is to provide
    security. It has no role in documentation of export/import,
    as well as issuance and checking of driving licenses, PUC
    certificate, fitness certificate of the vehicles including the
    load, as BSF is not empowered to check the above
    documents under any law to do so, as already directed vide
    Hon’ble court order dated 28.09.1999 and mentioned in the
    letter issued by the Commissioner of Customs, Shillong,

    Page 3 of 4
    Meghalaya on dated 27.11.2003 regarding the role of the
    BSF at the Land Customs Stations.”

    5. Learned DSGI also seeks time to file an affidavit-in-reply on

    behalf of the Land Customs Station. Time granted. Affidavit to be

    filed in the Registry latest by 4th May, 2026.

    6. Considering the issues raised, we deem it appropriate to

    appoint Mr. Philemon Nongbri, as Amicus to assist the Court. A

    copy of the petition along with the orders and the status reports

    tendered today by the learned Advocate General and learned DSGI

    to be served on Mr. Philemon Nongbri during the course of this

    week to enable him to go through the same. Copy of the affidavits

    to be filed, also to be served on Mr. Nongbri by 4th May, 2026.

    7. The Commissioner of Transport and the Secretary, Forest

    Department to remain present on the next date.

    8. Stand over to 6th May, 2026.

                           (H.S. Thangkhiew)                      (Revati Mohite Dere)
                                 Judge                                Chief Justice
                  Meghalaya
                  28.04.2026
                  "Lam DR-PS"
                                                                                  Page 4 of 4
    
    
    Signature Not Verified
    Digitally signed by
    LAMPHRANG KHARCHANDY
    Date: 2026.04.28 16:15:12 IST
    



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here