Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Ranjeet vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:10924) on 5 March, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:10924]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 937/2026
Ranjeet S/o Ramesh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Gameti Fala
Khedaghati, P.s Patiya, District Udaipur Raj. (At Present Lodged
In Central Jail Udaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Kalla
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pawan Bhati, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order
05/03/2026
This second application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS
(439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by petitioner who has been arrested in
the present matter. The requisite details of the matter are
tabulated herein below:
S. No. Particulars of the case
1. FIR Number 01/2025
2. Police Station Patiya
3. District Udaipur
4. Offences alleged in the FIR Section 332(g), 109, 115(2),
324(4) (5), 3(5) of BNS
5. Offences added, if any
The 1st bail application filed on behalf of petitioner i.e. S.B.
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3853/2025 was dismissed as not
pressed, vide order dated 05.12.2025 passed by this Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has
been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel
further submitted that the injured Jivali Devi and eye witness
Aruna has submitted in their statement that the petitioner and the
complainant has previous enmity.
(Uploaded on 05/03/2026 at 05:25:09 PM)
(Downloaded on 05/03/2026 at 08:33:40 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:10924] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-937/2026]
Learned counsel for the petitioner drew the attention of this
Court towards the statement of PW-7 recorded before the trial
Court in which he has not opined whether the injuries were
dangerous to life. Therefore, benefit of bail may be granted to
accused-petitioner.
Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed second
bail application. However, he is not in a position to refute the fact
that as per the statement, Medical Officer has not opined whether
the injuries were dangerous to life.
Having heard and considered the rival submissions, facts and
circumstances of the case as well as perused material available on
record; petitioner has been in custody since 03.01.2025, this
Court is inclined to enlarge petitioner on bail.
Consequently, second bail application under Section 483 of
BNSS (439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that accused-petitioner
as named in the cause title, arrested in connection with above
mentioned FIR, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any
other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of
Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, to the
satisfaction of learned trial court, for his/her/their appearance
before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever
called upon to do so till completion of the trial.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
49-AbhishekS/-
(Uploaded on 05/03/2026 at 05:25:09 PM)
(Downloaded on 05/03/2026 at 08:33:40 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)