Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Ramswaroop Jat @ Ramswaroop Choudhary @ … vs State Of Rajasthan on 28 July, 2025
Bench: Sudhanshu Dhulia, Aravind Kumar
1
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.8 SECTION II-D
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5203/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06-03-2025
in SBCRMSBA No. 3218/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature
for Rajasthan at Jaipur]
RAMSWAROOP JAT @ RAMSWAROOP CHOUDHARY @ GAJNI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondent(s)
IA No. 86684/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT, IA No. 86685/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
Date : 28-07-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Nishant Bishnoi, AOR
Ms. Srishti Prabhakar, Adv.
Mr. Raghav Khanna, Adv.
Mr. Devkishan Bishnoi, Adv.
Mr. Rohan Trivedi, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sansriti Pathak, A.A.G.
Ms. Shagufa Khan, Adv.
Mr. Aman Prasad, Adv.
Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
The petitioner is an accused for the offences punishable
under Sections 3/25, 25(6), 25(8) of the Arms Act,
Sections 387, 302/115, 201 and Section 120B of the Indian
Signature Not Verified
Penal Code and Section 42 of the Prisons Act. His bail
Digitally signed by
Jayant Kumar Arora
Date: 2025.07.28
17:01:36 IST
Reason: application was rejected by the High Court vide impugned
order 06.03.2025.
2
He has already undergone more one year in jail and
primarily, the charge against the petitioner is only under
the Arms Act. Although there is also a charge under
Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, but there is no
direct allegation against the petitioner. The only
allegation against the petitioner is that the weapon he
had, according to the prosecution, would have been used
for the murder. The prayer for bail is vehemently opposed
by the learned counsel appearing for the State.
Considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner
and the entire facts and circumstances of this case, we
are of the opinion that a case of bail is made out for the
petitioner and therefore, the prayer for bail is allowed.
Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on
bail forthwith on the usual terms and conditions to be
decided by the concerned Court.
The present Special Leave Petition shall stand disposed
of in the above terms along with pending application(s),
if any.
(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (RENU BALA GAMBHIR)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
