Advertisement
Advertisement

― Advertisement ―

HomeRamanand Prasad Singh @ Ramanand Singh vs The State Of Bihar on...

Ramanand Prasad Singh @ Ramanand Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 16 March, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Patna High Court

Ramanand Prasad Singh @ Ramanand Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 16 March, 2026

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                  CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36134 of 2022
           Arising out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2018 Thana- MORKAHI District- Khagaria
     ======================================================
     Ramanand Prasad Singh @ Ramanand Singh, Son of Late Chaturanand
     Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Sabalpur, P.S.- Morkahi, District - Kha-
     garia.
                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.    The State of Bihar
2.    Randhir Kumar, Son of Aklu Prasad Singh, Resident of Village - Sabalpur,
      Patralay - Madar, Ward No.- 09, P.S.- Morkahi, District - Khagaria.
                                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate
                                      Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate
     For the Opposite Party/s:        Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                          ORAL JUDGMENT
      Date : 16-03-2026

                     Heard Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, learned senior coun-

     sel for the petitioner assisted with Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, learned

     counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned Additional

     Public Prosecutor for the State.

                  2. Petitioner seeks quashing of the order of cognizance

     dated 24.11.2021 passed in connection with Morkahi P.S. Case No.

     30 of 2018 (G.R. No. 854 of 2018) whereby and whereunder the

     learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria has taken

     cognizance of the offence under Sections 323, 354, 376, 406, 420,

     494 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

                  3. The prosecution case is that the complaint was filed

     by one Randhir Kumar on 07.09.2017 before the learned Chief Ju-
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36134 of 2022 dt.16-03-2026
                                  2/3




dicial Magistrate, Khagaria, thereafter, the Complaint under Sec-

tion 156(3) Cr.P.C. was sent for registering the FIR and the FIR

was lodged on 05.04.2018. It was alleged that Aklu Singh used to

commit rape upon his mother namely Sita Devi in absence of his

father. It is further alleged that petitioner continued physical rela-

tionship with his mother for last about 5-6 years upon which the

present informant was born. It was narrated to the informant after

becoming major that his father is Aklu Singh, therefore, the infor-

mant has claimed his legal right by declaring the informant as le-

gal heir.

            4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

sample has been taken for paternity test but there is no indication

as to whether report has been received. The filing of complaint

case by son against his father of raping his mother stating that he is

legitimate son is absurd. Moreover, claim of the informant is that

he wanted social recognition, love of his father and legal right in

property that is why the present complaint has been filed. He fur-

ther submits that the complaint has been filed only to settle a dis-

pute taking recourse of criminal case. It is also submitted that the

matter has been proceeded for FSL Report but the petitioner will

get his legal right in property after succeeding in paternity suit and

upon receiving of the FSL Report in his favour.
                                   Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36134 of 2022 dt.16-03-2026
                                                      3/3




                              5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has

                    vehemently opposed the quashing of the order of cognizance dated

                    24.11.2021.

                              6

. In such situation, the present prosecution is nothing

but an abuse of the process of law, therefore, this Court exercising

SPONSORED

its inherent power conferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C. corre-

sponding to Section 528 BNSS as well as in view of the judgment

passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of State of

Haryana & Ors. vs. Chaudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors reported in

AIR 1992 SC 604 quash the order of cognizance dated 24.11.2021

passed in connection with Morkahi P.S. Case No. 30 of 2018 (G.R.

No. 854 of 2018) whereby and whereunder the learned Sub-divi-

sional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria has taken cognizance of the

offence under Sections 323, 354, 376, 406, 420, 494 and 506 of

the Indian Penal Code so far as the petitioner is concerned.

7. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed.

(Ansul, J)
Vikash/-

AFR/NAFR                  NAFR
CAV DATE                  N/A
Uploading Date
Transmission Date
 



Source link