Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

The New Frontier of Psychological Extortion

In a chilling escalation of cybercrime, a 70-year-old woman in Dehradun was recently defrauded of ₹3.09 crore in a “digital arrest” scam that...
HomeHigh CourtPatna High CourtRakesh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 19 February, 2026

Rakesh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 19 February, 2026


and upon his undertaking that he would keep his

wife/O.P. No.2 with full dignity and respect, the matter was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49071 of 2025 dt.19-02-2026

pacified and settled and both started living together. It has

further been submitted that the petitioner mischievously filed

Divorce Case No. 319 of 2023 on 18.07.2023 on false grounds,

even at a time when he was residing with O.P. No.2 in the

matrimonial house and that O.P. No.2 had no knowledge of the

filing of the said divorce case as the petitioner allegedly

managed the service of notice upon her, as a result of which she

could not appear and the divorce decree was granted ex parte.

Learned counsel for O.P. No.2 further submits that the demand

of dowry and torture continued and ultimately she was ousted

on 16.09.2023, whereafter she went to her maike and despite

repeated requests the petitioner did not take steps to pacify the

dispute, leaving O.P. No.2 with no option but to institute the

present complaint on 20.09.2023. It has been submitted that so

far as the divorce case is concerned, Miscellaneous Appeal No.

347 of 2025 has already been filed and the same is pending

before the Hon’ble High Court at Patna challenging the

judgment and decree dated 27.11.2024 and 09.12.2024

respectively. It has further been pointed out that the said

miscellaneous appeal had earlier been dismissed for default,

however, the same has subsequently been restored to its

original file. It has lastly been submitted that O.P. No.2 has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49071 of 2025 dt.19-02-2026

been left alone without any independent source of income and

is constrained to look after her ailing father who has suffered a

paralytic attack and that the mother of O.P. No.2 is also

seriously ill, suffering from severe renal issues and thus it has

been submitted that the present application is misconceived,

there is no illegality in the impugned order and the same is fit

to be dismissed.



Source link