Advertisement
Advertisement

― Advertisement ―

Denial of Services and Information

Human rights not only include right to speech, freedom or press it also involves ‘Right to Health’ which is a major right which...

Easy solutions

HomeRajat vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 16 March, 2026

Rajat vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 16 March, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Rajat vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 16 March, 2026

                                      IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                    CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.        OF 2026
                                       (@ SLP (Crl.) No.16190/2025)


                         RAJAT                                        APPELLANT(s)

                                                     VERSUS


                         STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.                RESPONDENT(s)


                                                     O R D E R

Leave granted.

The appellant seeks anticipatory bail in

SPONSORED

connection with FIR No. 80/2017 dated 03.03.2017

registered for the offences punishable under

Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 313 and 376 of

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘IPC’) and

Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act,

1961.

We have heard the learned counsel appearing

for the parties.

Learned counsel appearing for the appellant
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
MOHD IBRAHIM
Date: 2026.03.17
17:22:22 IST
Reason: SLP (Crl.) No.16190/2025 1
submits that the appellant was the minor brother-

in-law of the complainant at the time of the

alleged incident. He further submits that vide the

supplementary chargesheet dated 07.07.2019, the

charges were dropped qua the present appellant.

However, the learned Magistrate had passed the

order taking cognizance based on the earlier

chargesheet.

Suffice it to state, that the investigation

has been concluded in the instant case, and the

matter is now pending before the Trial Court for

further proceedings. The prosecution itself had

dropped the charges in the supplementary

chargesheet, insofar as the charges against the

appellant are concerned.

In such view of the matter, we are inclined

to grant anticipatory bail to the appellant,

especially in view of the fact that he was a minor

and a student at the time of the alleged incident.

Accordingly, the impugned order stands set

aside, and the appellant is granted anticipatory

SLP (Crl.) No.16190/2025 2
bail, subject to the terms and conditions that may

be imposed by the concerned Trial Court.

The appeal is allowed, accordingly.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand

disposed of.

………………………………………………………………………………J.

[M.M. SUNDRESH]

…………………………………………………………………………..J.
[NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH]

NEW DELHI;

MARCH 16, 2026

SLP (Crl.) No.16190/2025 3
ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.5 SECTION II

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)
No(s).16190/2025

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order
dated 21-05-2025 in CRMABA No. 9170/2024 passed
by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]

RAJAT Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)

Date : 16-03-2026 This petition was called on for
hearing today.

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR
SINGH

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Pandey, AOR
Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Ms. Ruchira Goel, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the
following
O R D E R

Leave granted.

SLP (Crl.) No.16190/2025 4
The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed

order which is placed on the file.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand

disposed of.

(MOHD IBRAHIM) (POONAM VAID)
SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SLP (Crl.) No.16190/2025 5



Source link