Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

A Constitutional Analysis Through the Doctrine of Pith and Substance – Law School Policy Review

Sanskriti Verma Abstract: This post examines how the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025 fails constitutional scrutiny under the Doctrine of Pith...
HomeDistrict CourtsBangalore District CourtR Gandhi vs A Shivakumar on 18 February, 2026

R Gandhi vs A Shivakumar on 18 February, 2026


The present complaint is filed under section 2(d) read

with section 200 of code of criminal procedure against the

accused seeking to punish him for the offense punishable

under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act ( in

short referred as “N.I. Act”).

02. The alleged facts in the complaint are summarized

as under;

It is stated that, the Complainant is the owner of the

TLC Mandi situated at No.56, New Kalasipalya Market,

Bengaluru. The accused has been carrying the vegetable

business for the past 25 years. The accused has known to

he Complainant . From 2021 to May 2022 the accused

had supplying the carrot to the Complainant by receiving

advance amount of Rs.8 lakhs. In the month of May 2022

the accused had stopped supplying carrot to the

Complainant. The accused assured the Complainant to

C.C. No.41604/ 2024
supply carrot to the Complainant until and unless the

accused clear the debt of Rs.8,00,000/- and at that time

the accused had given four cheques bearing No.472249,

472250, 472251 and 472252 to the Complainant for

Rs.8,00,000/- all the cheque were drawn on Indian Bank,

M. Palada Branch, Tamil Nadu and also executed MOU to

the Complainant. Thereafter the accused failed to supply

carrot to the Complainant as agreed. In the 1 st week of

October the Complainant approached the accused

personally and requested to repay the advance amount of

Rs.8,00,000/- by that time the accused instructed the

Complainant to present the cheques for encashment on

10.10.2022. Accordingly, the Complainant presented the

said two cheques bearing No.472249 and 472250 for

encashment on 10.10.2022 through his banker, the said

cheques were returned unpaid with endorsement “Funds

insufficient” on 12.10.2022. Thereafter on 17.10.2022,

demand notice was issued to the accused by way of RPAD.

The said notice was duly served to the accused on

C.C. No.41604/ 2024
27.10.2022. In spite of service of notice the accused has

not paid the cheque amount. On these grounds, it is

sought to convict the accused for the offence punishable

under section 138 of NI Act and grant compensation as per

section 357 of Code of Criminal Procedure.



Source link