Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Puranram @ Raju vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:31765) on 18 July, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:31765]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7981/2025
Puranram @ Raju S/o Shri Dungar Ram, Aged About 35 Years,
R/o Dhani Bhagsart/05/NP, Budha Johad Police Station Muklawa
District - Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan
(Lodged In Sub Jail Anoopgarh)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tirupati Chandra
Mr. Abhishek Aggarwal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order
18/07/2025
The instant application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS
(439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been
arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.91/2025, registered at Police
Station Ramsinghpur, District – Sriganganagar, for the offences
under Sections 333, 110, 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 189(2) of the
BNS.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has been falsely implicated in this case. It is contended by the
learned counsel for the petitioner that the complainant is the wife
of the petitioner. The petitioner was having some objection with
regard to illicit relations of his wife and, therefore, his wife has
(Downloaded on 21/07/2025 at 09:43:57 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:31765] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7981/2025]
lodged a false case against him. It is further contended by learned
counsel for the petitioner that the injury which was alleged to be
attributed to the petitioner is neither on vital part of the body nor
dangerous to life. Learned counsel for the petitioner therefore,
submits that the case does not travel under Section 117(2) of the
BNS (Section 325 IPC).
Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is in judicial
custody since 03.06.2025 and the challan has already been filed
and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore,
the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes
the bail application and submits that the petitioner along with
other co-accused persons has beaten the complainant and his
cousin Anis Kumar. Learned Public Prosecutor has drawn attention
of this Court towards the injury report of the Birmadevi
(complainant), in which out of four injuries received by the injured
Birmadevi, three injuries are of grievous nature but they are on
hand and leg.
Having considered the rival submissions, facts and
circumstances of the case, considering that out of 4 injuries
received by Birmadevi, 3 injuries are through grievous in nature
but the same are on hand and leg which are not vital parts of the
body; the petitioner is in judicial custody since 03.06.2025; the
charge-sheet has already been filed and the trial will take
significant time, without expressing any opinion on
merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the
petitioner on bail.
(Downloaded on 21/07/2025 at 09:43:57 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:31765] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7981/2025]
Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS
(439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner
Puranram @ Raju S/o Shri Dungar Ram, arrested in
connection with F.I.R. No.91/2025, registered at Police Station
Ramsinghpur, District – Sriganganagar, shall be released on bail, if
not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal
bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the
satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that
court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon
to do so till completion of the trial.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
134-Ramesh/-
(Downloaded on 21/07/2025 at 09:43:57 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
