Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Pooja Kanwar D/O Shanker Singh W/O … vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:17254) on 23 April, 2025
Author: Sameer Jain
Bench: Sameer Jain
[2025:RJ-JP:17254]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6388/2021
1. Pooja Kanwar D/o Shanker Singh W/o Jitendra Singh,
Aged About 22 Years, R/o Fadanpura, Teh. Ramgarh,
Sikar, Rajasthan-333033
2. Jitendra Singh Shekhawat S/o Shri Ramotar Singh, Aged
About 21 Years, R/o Vill. Chorardi Aguni The. Chidawa
Dist. Jhunjhunu. Rajasthan-332301.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Department Of
Home Affairs Govt. Secretariat Jaipur.
2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi,
Jaipur.
3. Inspector General Of Police Jaipur Range, Jaipur
Rajasthan.
4. Superintendent Of Police, Jhunjhunu.
5. Sho, Police Station Chidawa, Dist. Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
6. Superintendent Of Police, Sikar.
7. Sho, Police Station Ramgarh, Dist, Sikar, Rajasthan.
8. Shanker Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 56 Years,
R/o Fadanpura, Teh. Ramgarh, Sikar Rajasthan 333033
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal for
Mr. Rhishiraj Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP
with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
23/04/2025
1. Heard and considered.
2. Vide the judgment dated 02.08.2024 in S.B. Criminal Writ
Petition No. 792/2024 titled as Suman Meena & Anr. Vs.
(Downloaded on 28/04/2025 at 10:09:59 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:17254] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6388/2021]
State of Rajasthan & Ors., this Court issued directions
specifying the mechanisms/remedies which may be invoked by the
person(s) who seek the implementation of measures to ensure
their safety, on account of extra-legal threats to their lives or
liberty from other social actors or groups. Therefore, the matter is
no longer res integra, and is squarely covered by the directions of
this Court in the judgment of Suman Meena (supra).
3. This Court observes that in the present case, the
petitioner(s) has/have failed to comply with the directions of this
Court in the judgment of Suman Meena (supra). Further, the
Registry has failed to ensure that the petition includes due
pleadings and a footnote disclosing the details which indicate that
the alternative efficacious remedies have already been availed of
in accordance with the directions of this Court in Suman Meena
(supra).
4. Accordingly, in terms of the judgment pronounced in Suman
Meena (supra), the instant petition is disposed of. Pending
applications, if any, stand disposed of.
5. A copy of this order be sent to the Registrar (Judicial) to
ensure compliance with the directions issued by this Court in
Suman Meena (supra) regarding the contents of the petitions
wherein directions are sought pertaining to protection.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
DEEPAK/100
(Downloaded on 28/04/2025 at 10:09:59 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)