Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

spot_img
HomeCivil LawsP Sunitha vs The State Of Ap on 14 July, 2025

P Sunitha vs The State Of Ap on 14 July, 2025


WHEREAS the Petitioner above named through his Advocate SRI
SATISH SANDU presented thI’S Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,

the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus or any other
appropriate Writ Or direction Or Order declaring the actI-On Of the Respondents

jn interfering with petitioner’s peaceful possession and enJ-Oyment Of the land

to an extent of Ac. 3.35 cents in Sy.No.797/2 situated within the vmage limits

of Kambhamvaripalli, K.V. PaIIi MandaI, Annamayya District, and trying to

evict/dispossess the petitioner from his land as illegal, arbitrary and in violation

of principles of natural justice and Article 21 and 300-A of Constitution of lnc!ia
__xp ,
;}Y,-_ \ -.t
. \’

+

. and consequently dl’rec{ the Respondents not to Interfere wlth the peaceful

possession and enjoyment of petI-tI’Oner’s Iand to an extent of Ac. 3.35 cents in
sy.No. 797/2 situated withI-n the village II-mlltS Of KambhamvaripallI’, K.V. Pam

MandaI, Annamayya District, In any manner. Z

AND WHEREAS the Hl’gh court upon perusI-ng the petI’tl’On and affidavI|t
flled herem and upon hearlng the arguments of srl SATISH SANDU Advocate /
for the petitioner, and of GP FOR REVENUE, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4,
dl’rected l|ssue of notI-Ce to the Respondents hereI’n to show cause as to why
this WRIT PETITION shou`Id not be admI-tted.



Source link