Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

HomeHigh CourtUttarakhand High CourtNarendra ........Appellant/ vs State Of Uttarakhand on 18 February, 2026

Narendra ……..Appellant/ vs State Of Uttarakhand on 18 February, 2026


Uttarakhand High Court

Narendra ……..Appellant/ vs State Of Uttarakhand on 18 February, 2026

Author: Ravindra Maithani

Bench: Ravindra Maithani

     HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

 Short Term Bail Application (IA) No.4263 of 2026
                        In
         Criminal Appeal No. 379 of 2018

Narendra                                     ........Appellant/Applicant

                                     Vs.

State of Uttarakhand                               ........... Respondent

Present : Mr. Safdar, Advocate for the appellant/applicant.
          Mr. Pankaj Joshi, AGA for the State.
          Mr. Rajendra Singh Azad, Advocate for the informant.


Coram :       Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani. J.
              Hon'ble Siddhartha Sah, J.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Instant appeal is preferred against the

judgment and order dated 17.10.2018, passed in

Sessions Trial No.275 of 2014, State of Uttarakhand vs.

Balister and others, by the court of District and Sessions

Judge, Haridwar. By it, the appellant Narendra has been

convicted and sentenced under Sections 147, 148, 149,

302, 307, 341, 34 IPC. The appellant Narendra has filed a

short term bail application on the ground that on

20.02.2026 his son is getting married.

2. Heard on Short Term Bail Application (IA)

No.4263 of 2026.

2

3. Learned counsel for the appellant would

submit that the son of the appellant is getting married on

20.02.2026. Therefore, he may be granted short term bail

for two weeks.

4. Learned State Counsel as well as learned

counsel for the informant was required to get

instructions.

5. Learned counsel for the informant submits that

the marriage of the son of the appellant Narendra is

scheduled on 20.02.2026. He submits that one week’s

short term bail may be granted to the appellant, but

certain conditions may be imposed that he should not

commit any offence.

6. Learned counsel for the appellant would

submit that the appellant would not commit any offence;

he should be released on short term bail; he is unwell; he

is a kidney patient.

7. Having considered, without adverting to the

merits of the case, purely on the humanitarian ground,

this Court is of the view that the appellant may be

enlarged on short term bail for a period of one week from

the date of his release.

3

8. Let the appellant be released on short term bail

for a period of one week from the date of his actual

release, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing

two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the

satisfaction of the court concerned.

9. It is further directed that, on expiry of the

period of short term bail, the appellant shall surrender

before the court concerned and intimation to that effect

shall also be given to this Court.

10. The short term bail application stands disposed

of.

11. Let a copy of this order be supplied to the

learned counsel for the appellant today itself, on payment

of usual charges, as per Rules.

12. List along with connected matters on

30.03.2026.

(Siddhartha Sah, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.)
18.02.2026
Sanjay



Source link