Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

Corporate Governance in India : Legal Framework and Challenges

Indian corporate governance is based on a relatively elaborate statutory-regulatory framework established on the basis of the Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI Listing...
HomeHigh CourtJammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar BenchMohammad Yaqoob Wani vs Rish Pal Singh And Anr on 23 February,...

Mohammad Yaqoob Wani vs Rish Pal Singh And Anr on 23 February, 2026

Jammu & Kashmir High Court – Srinagar Bench

Mohammad Yaqoob Wani vs Rish Pal Singh And Anr on 23 February, 2026

                                                         Serial No. 01
                                                       Regular Cause List

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                     AT SRINAGAR
                   CM(737/2026) IN CCP(S) 52/2025
MOHAMMAD YAQOOB WANI                              ...Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s).

Through:      Mr. Yawar Ramzan, Advocate
                                  Vs.
RISH PAL SINGH AND ANR.                                       ...Respondent(s).

Through:      Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG with
              Ms Maha Majeed, AC

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE
                                     ORDER

23.02.2026

1. The petitioner is present in person.

2. Through the medium of the instant miscellaneous application, the

applicant/contempt petitioner seeks issuance of orders against the non-

applicants/respondents for addressing his pending application already

filed by him in terms of the provisions of Section 25 of the Jammu &

Kashmir, State Evacuees (Administration of Property) Act, 2006

(hereinafter referred to as “the Evacuees Act” for short) regarding

confirmation of the Power of Attorney alleged to have been executed by

the Evacuee in his favour.

3. It is the case of the applicant, as projected through the medium of the

instant application that, after the document of Power of Attorney sought

to be confirmed, came to be executed in accordance with the law, he

approached the office of the non-applicant/respondent No. 1 with an

application in terms of provisions of Section 25 of the Evacuee Act

seeking confirmation of the same so as to able to reap the fruits of the

same by exercising the powers conferred thereunder. That the

unnecessary delay on the part of the non-applicants/respondents in

attending his application constrained him to approach this Court through
the medium of a writ petition bearing No. WP(C) 1881/2024, seeking

issuance of writs/directions for commanding the respondents/alleged

contemnors to immediately address his pending application.

4. The said writ petition came to be disposed of vide order dated

23.08.2024 with the direction to the respondents to perform their

statutory duty thereby according consideration to the application stated to

have been filed by the petitioner within a reasonable time frame under

law/rules, preferably within a period of four weeks’ from the date of

receipt of the certified copy of the said order along with the complete

paper book. That, thereafter, non-applicant/respondent No. 1, i.e.,

Custodian General, Evacuee Property Department, UT of J&K, endorsed

the said deed of Power of Attorney with his communication to the office

of the Deputy Commissioner, Srinagar, for authentication of the same

after verification of payment of proper stamp duty and other legal

requirements. That the office of the Deputy Commissioner, Srinagar has

slept over the matter by not performing his statutory duty to authenticate

the deed in accordance with the law pursuant to the communication of

non-applicant/respondent No. 1, i.e., office of the Custodian General,

Evacuee Property Department, UT of J&K.

5. It has been submitted by the applicant/petitioner in the instant

application that he has been badly suffering on account of the delayed

disposal of his application under Section 25 of the Evacuee Act. He has

further submitted in the application that he has paid the entire stamp duty

as directed by the office of the Deputy Commissioner, Srinagar, but

despite the appropriate orders regarding authentication of the document

have not been passed in the matter, which has consequently delayed

confirmation of the said document by the office of the non-

applicant/respondent No. 1.

6. The main contempt petition, which is obviously aimed at achieving the

same objective, is fixed for hearing on 04.03.2026.

7. Mr. Mohsin Qadri, learned Sr. AAG, appeared in the matter at this stage

and submitted that the present applicant/petitioner has filed another writ

petition concerning the same subject matter bearing No. WP(C)

1558/2025, which is listed for hearing on 30.03.2026.

8. It is further submitted by the learned Sr. AAG that some University has

made a requisition for acquisition of the same land, and the petitioner,

upon knowing about the said development, has filed the aforesaid writ

petition with the prayer seeking his association in the acquisition

proceedings, if any, initiated, as being the Attorney Holder of the

Evacuee concerned.

9. It is admitted by the applicant/petitioner that he has filed the aforesaid

writ petition for safeguarding his rights as a duly authorized Attorney

Holder and accordingly sought his association in the acquisition

proceedings, if any, initiated.

10. The learned Sr. AAG further submits that this matter be clubbed along

with the said writ petition for the sake of convenience, to which the

present applicant/petitioner has no objection. However, the scope of the

instant application and the main contempt petition is different.

11. The applicant/petitioner through the medium of the instant

miscellaneous application is seeking an innocuous prayer for directing the

non-applicants to speed up the process on his pending application filed

under and in terms of provisions of Section 25 of the Evacuee Act.

12. This application is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the

non-applicants as well as to the Deputy Commissioner, Srinagar to

immediately address the pending application of the applicant/petitioner

and submit the compliance report in terms of the basic judgment dated
23.08.2024 in the pending contempt petition by the next date of hearing,

which is now fixed as 23.03.2026.

13. The connected petition bearing No. WP(C) 1558/2025 shall also come

up for hearing with the contempt matter as a clubbed case on the next

date fixed, i.e., 23.03.2026.

14. Let a copy of this order be forwarded to the non-applicants as also to

the Deputy Commissioner, Srinagar for compliance.

(MOHD YOUSUF WANI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR
23.02.2026
ARIF



Source link