Madras High Court: Historic Decision on Temple Priests
मंदिर के पुजारियों पर Madras High Court का ऐतिहासिक फैसला
Madras High Court ne haal hi mein ek mahatvapoorn faisla sunaaya hai jo mandir ke pujaariyon kee niyukti mein yogyata aur samaanata ke mahatv par prakaash daalata hai.
court ka faisla 2018 mein daayar ek writ petition ke javaab mein aaya hai, jisamen Sri Sugavaneswarar Swamy Temple, Salem (TN) mein Archagar/Sthanigar (mandir pujaaree) ke pad ke lie naukari ki ghoshana ko chunautee di gai thi.
petitioner ne mandir ke aagam granthon mein mentioned traditional guidelines aur lambe samay se seva krne vaale pujaariyon ke hereditary rights ke aadhaar par niyuktiyon ke lie tark diya.
court ne petitioner ke daave ko khaarij krte hue yogyata aadhaarit niyuktiyon ke paksh mein phaisala sunaaya.
Aie jante hai mandir pujaaree niyuktiyon ke Legal aur Historical Aspects kya hain?
Article 15 religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth ke aadhaar par bhedbhaav par rok lgata hai.
isme kaha gaya hai ki raajya rozgaar ya saarvajanik sthaanon tak pahunch ke maamlon mein in aadhaaron par kisee bhee naagarik ke saath bhedabhaav nahin krega.
saath hee, states ke paas mandir ke pujaariyon kee niyukti sahit religious institutions aur unake maamlon ko regulate krne ka adhikaar hai.
State legislation aisi niyuktiyon ke lie ualifications, procedures aur eligibility criteria nirdhaarit kar sakata hai.
kai Hindu mandiron mein, hereditary appointments ki parampara prachalit hai, jahaan mandir ke pujaari ko vishisht parivaaron ya jaatiyon ke andr pass kiya jaata hai.
mandir aksar aagam granthon ka paalan karate hain jo mandir ke rituals and practices ke lie guidelines pradaan krte hain.
yeh pratha aksar ancestral knowledge aur vansh kee shuddhata mein vishvaas par aadhaarit hotee hai.
haalaanki, kuchh kshetron mein open competitions ya yogyata ke aadhaar par chayan bhi prachalit hai.
mandir pujaaree appointments ke sambandh mein supreme court ke phaisale kya hain uske upr thodi nzr dalte hai
Seshammal & others vs. State of Tamil Nadu (1972):
Supreme court ne maana ki archak yani k mandir pujaaree ki niyukti ek dharmanirapeksh kaarya hai, aur pujaariyon dvaara dhaarmik seva ka pradarshan dharm ka ek integral part hai.
court ne dharmanirapeksh aur dhaarmik pahaluon ke beech antar kiya aur kaha ki aagam (granthon) dvaara pradaan kiya gaya prescription keval dhaarmik seva ke pradarshan ke lie mahatvapoorn hai.
kisi bhi vyakti ko, jaati ya panth kee paravaah kie bina, archak ke roop mein niyukt kiya ja sakata hai yadi ve aagamo aur mandir pooja ke lie aavashyak anushthaanon mein achchhee tarah se vaakiph aur yogya hain.
Supreme court ke is nirnay ke aadhaar par, is maamale mein Madras high court ne maana hai ki jaati ke aadhaar par vansh ki archak ki niyukti mein koi bhoomika nahin hogee yadi is prakaar chuna gaya vyakti anya requirements ko poora karata hai.
N. Adithayan vs. Travancore Devaswom Board (2002):
Supreme court ne is customary claim ko khaarij kar diya ki keval braahman hi mandiron mein rituals kr skte hain.
adaalat ne faisla sunaaya ki uchit tarike se pooja krne ke lie trained qualified vyakti rituals kar skte hain.
supreme court ne is baat par jor diya ki kuch mandiron mein keval braahmano dvaara rituals krne par pratibandh aitihaasik kaaranon se tha, jaise Vedic literature aur pavitr deeksha tak limited access.
Asha hai is video ke zariye apko Madras high court ka mandiro me pujari niyukt krne ke kanoon pr puri jankari mili hogi. Agr apke mn me ise lekr koi aur swal hai to comment section me puchna na bhule.
#MadrasHighCourt #TemplePriests #MeritocracyInTemples #EqualityInAppointments #TempleReforms #SCJudgements #TemplePriestAppointments #AgamaScriptures #HereditaryAppointments #Article15 #ReligiousEquality #StateRegulations #SecularFunction #ReligiousService #HistoricalTraditions #CasteInAppointments #OpenCompetitions #Qualifications #AncestralKnowledge #PurityOfLineage
