The Court:
1. The delay in filing the review application is condoned upon acceptance
of the explanations given in paragraphs 11 to 15 of the said application.
GA-COM 2 of 2025 is allowed. The applicant cannot be penalized for the
inability of the learned Advocate to attend the court’s proceeding.
2. The review application is taken up for hearing. Mr. Puspal Chakraborty,
learned advocate for the petitioner submits that sufficient grounds for
review of the order dated December 11, 2024 had not been made out by
the applicant, who was the respondent in AP-COM 1011 of 2024.
3. According to Mr. Chakraborty, the learned Arbitrator had expressed
that he was not inclined to continue with the arbitral proceeding and
closed the proceeding with an observation that the claimant was
disinterested to extend the mandate.