Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

Lessons Entrepreneurs Can Learn From High-Stakes Consumer Protection Lawsuits

According to Jeff Kaliel, understanding consumer protection laws is essential for entrepreneurs navigating today’s businesses, as violations can lead to costly lawsuits, public...
HomeHigh CourtCalcutta High Court (Appellete Side)Krishna Chandra Pal vs Unknown on 23 February, 2026

Krishna Chandra Pal vs Unknown on 23 February, 2026

Learned Advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the

petitioner is in custody for more than one year three months. The

learned Trial Judge has considered only the deposition of the child

witness namely, Kiran Pal, whose statement under Section 161 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure says that his mother consumed

poison. However, during his statement before the learned Judicial

Magistrate, recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, he narrated that his father and grand-parents forcefully

administered poison to his mother and as a result of which his

mother died. In his deposition he narrated the same thing. On the

basis of such statement of the said child witness, the learned Trial

Judge acquitted the grand-parents but convicted the present

petitioner who is the father of the said child witness. The statement

of PW 6 before whom the victim allegedly stated that the petitioner

along with his parents compelled her to swallow poison cannot be

relied upon since neither any doctor was examined nor there was

any recorded dying declaration. The petitioner may be granted bail

on any condition since the petitioner has sufficient materials to

argue in support of his acquittal.



Source link