AIRRNEWS

Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

HomeDistrict CourtsBangalore District CourtIreen C vs Suvarnalatha A on 16 February, 2026

Ireen C vs Suvarnalatha A on 16 February, 2026

Appellant has filed this appeal u/s 374(3) of Code of

Criminal Procedure assailing the judgment of conviction

and order of sentence passed in C.C.No.3995/2018

dated 19/03/2022 on the file of VI Addl. Judge, Court of

Small Causes and ACMM, Bengaluru.

2. Rank of the parties is referred to as per their

ranks assigned before the trial court.

3. The facts of the case leading to this appeal

may be summarized as under;

3

Crl. Appeal No.458/2022

The respondent herein is the complainant before

the trial court, she has filed a private complaint under

Section 200 of Cr.P.C, alleging the offence committed by

the accused punishable under Section 138 of

Negotiable Instrument Act (herein after referred as N.I.

Act). According to the complainant, herself and accused

are residents of same locality and known to each other

for more than 10 years, accused approached the

complainant for an hand loan of Rs.3,50,000/- with an

assurance to repay the same by the end of June 2017,

as such considering the request, complainant paid

Rs.1,00,000/- on 03/04/2017, Rs.1,00,000/- on

14/04/2017 and Rs.1,50,000/- on 25/04/2017

respectively, thereafter the accused failed to repay the

loan amount to the complainant within the agreed period

of time, as such complainant demanded the accused to

repay her loan amount, thereafter accused towards

Crl. Appeal No.458/2022

discharge of the said loan issued a cheque bearing

No.083160 dated 14/06/2018 for a sum of Rs.3,50,000/-

drawn on Axis Bank Ltd., Malleshwaram branch,

Bengaluru, the same was presented through her banker

as per the instruction of the accused, the same was

dishonored and returned with an endorsement of

‘account closed’ vide memo dated 18/06/2018, as such

the complainant issued a legal notice demanded for

payment of loan amount on 16/07/2018, the same was

duly served on the accused, on the other hand the

accused neither chosen to give any reply nor repaid the

amount covered under the cheque, therefore after due

compliance of ingredients of Section 138 of Negotiable

Instrument Act filed a private complaint against the

accused. The trial court took cognizance and after going

through the materials, found prima facie case against

accused for the offences punishable under Section 138

Crl. Appeal No.458/2022

of Negotiable Instrument Act, registered criminal case

and issued summons.



Source link