that the service was not satisfactory. The court directed substituted service by
publication in two widely circulated dailies; one in English and one in Bengali.
The substituted service has been effected in ‘The Statesman’ and ‘Dainik
Statesman’.
3. Despite service, none appears on behalf of the respondents. It appears that
even at the stage of hearing of the application for injunction, being AP-COM
437 of 2025, despite repeated service, none appeared on behalf of the
respondents. Thus, the matter is taken up in their absence.
4. The respondents provided space to the petitioner’s predecessor, namely, M/s.
Hutchison Essar South Ltd. measuring about 2500 sq. ft. located at Dag No.
101, Khaitan No.- 387, J.L. No. 134, Touzi No.- 20, Mouza – Gulaichandi, P.S.
Basirhat, District – 24 Parganas [N], for installation of mobile tower and other
equipments. Accordingly, a license agreement for installation of tower was
executed on May 24, 2007.
